Comparative efficacy and safety of cognitive enhancers for treating vascular cognitive impairment: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Bayesian network meta-analysis
cholinesterase inhibitors
donepezil
galantamine
memantine
nerve regeneration
neural regeneration
pharmacotherapy
rivastigmine
systematic review
vascular cognitive impairment
vascular dementia
Journal
Neural regeneration research
ISSN: 1673-5374
Titre abrégé: Neural Regen Res
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101316351
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2019
May 2019
Historique:
entrez:
29
1
2019
pubmed:
29
1
2019
medline:
29
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess and compare the clinical efficacy and safety of cognitive enhancers (donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, and memantine) on cognition, behavior, function, and global status in patients with vascular cognitive impairment. The initial literature search was performed with PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Methodology Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health (CINAHL) from inception to January 2018 for studies regarding donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, and memantine for treatment of vascular cognitive impairment. Randomized controlled trials on donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, and memantine as monotherapy in the treatment of vascular cognitive impairment were included. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted. Efficacy was assessed by changes in scores of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, cognitive subscale, Mini-Mental State Examination, Neuropsychiatric Inventory scores and Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change Scale Plus Caregiver's Input, Activities of Daily Living, the Clinical Dementia Rating scale. Safety was evaluated by mortality, total adverse events (TAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), nausea, vomiting. diarrhea, or cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs). After screening 1717 citations, 12 randomized controlled trials were included. Donepezil and rivastigmine (mean difference (e) = -0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.25-1.32; MD = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.18-1.79) were significantly more effective than placebo in reducing Mini-Mental State Examination scores. Donepezil, galantamine, and memantine (MD = -1.30, 95% CI: -2.27 to -0.42; MD = -1.67, 95% CI: -3.36 to -0.06; MD = -2.27, 95% CI: -3.91 to -0.53) showed superior benefits on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive scores compared with placebo. Memantine (MD = 2.71, 95% CI: 1.05-7.29) improved global status (Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change Scale Plus Caregiver's Input) more than the placebo. Safety results revealed that donepezil 10 mg (odds ratio (OR) = 3.04, 95% CI: 1.86-5.41) contributed to higer risk of adverse events than placebo. Galantamine (OR = 5.64, 95% CI: 1.31-26.71) increased the risk of nausea. Rivastigmine (OR = 16.80, 95% CI: 1.78-319.26) increased the risk of vomiting. No agents displayed a significant risk of serious adverse events, mortality, cerebrovascular accidents, or diarrhea. We found significant efficacy of donepezil, galantamine, and memantine on cognition. Memantine can provide significant efficacy in global status. They are all safe and well tolerated.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30688266
pii: NeuralRegenRes_2019_14_5_805_249228
doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.249228
pmc: PMC6375033
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
805-816Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None
Références
Lancet. 2002 Apr 13;359(9314):1283-90
pubmed: 11965273
J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
pubmed: 1202204
Stroke. 2002 Jul;33(7):1834-9
pubmed: 12105362
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2002 Nov;17(6):297-305
pubmed: 12409683
J Neurol Sci. 2002 Nov 15;203-204:131-6
pubmed: 12417371
Neurology. 2003 Aug 26;61(4):479-86
pubmed: 12939421
Stroke. 2003 Oct;34(10):2323-30
pubmed: 12970516
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2004;17(1-2):29-34
pubmed: 14560062
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2003 Sep-Oct;18(5):265-72
pubmed: 14569643
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(1):CD004395
pubmed: 14974068
Stat Med. 2004 Oct 30;23(20):3105-24
pubmed: 15449338
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD003154
pubmed: 15846650
Neurobiol Aging. 2006 Dec;27(12):1769-85
pubmed: 16300856
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25;(1):CD004746
pubmed: 16437493
Neurology. 2007 Dec 11;69(24):2197-204
pubmed: 17568013
Neurology. 2007 Jul 31;69(5):448-58
pubmed: 17664404
Lancet Neurol. 2007 Sep;6(9):782-92
pubmed: 17689146
Stat Methods Med Res. 2008 Jun;17(3):279-301
pubmed: 17925316
Lancet Neurol. 2008 Apr;7(4):310-8
pubmed: 18296124
J Psychopharmacol. 2008 Sep;22(7):761-8
pubmed: 18308781
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Sep;24(9):2561-74
pubmed: 18674411
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2007 Dec;3(6):943-8
pubmed: 19300631
Open Med. 2009 Mar 24;3(2):e31-50
pubmed: 19946392
Acta Neurol Scand. 2010 Apr;121(4):217-24
pubmed: 19951274
Stroke. 2010 Jun;41(6):1213-21
pubmed: 20395618
Stroke. 2010 Jun;41(6):1084-99
pubmed: 20498453
Stroke. 2011 Sep;42(9):2672-713
pubmed: 21778438
Alzheimers Dement. 2013 Jan;9(1):1-11.e3
pubmed: 23305821
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;42(1):332-45
pubmed: 23508418
BMJ. 2013 May 14;346:f2914
pubmed: 23674332
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 May 31;(5):CD004744
pubmed: 23728651
Med Decis Making. 2013 Jul;33(5):641-56
pubmed: 23804508
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2014 Jul-Sep;28(3):206-18
pubmed: 24632990
Lancet. 2015 Aug 22;386(9995):743-800
pubmed: 26063472
Res Synth Methods. 2016 Sep;7(3):329-32
pubmed: 26588593
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;31(8):892-904
pubmed: 26680338
Eur Neurol. 2016;75(3-4):132-41
pubmed: 26918649
Alzheimers Dement. 2017 Jan;13(1):28-37
pubmed: 27172148
BMC Med. 2017 Jan 5;15(1):3
pubmed: 28052774
Clin Sci (Lond). 2017 Jun 1;131(11):1059-1068
pubmed: 28515342
ACS Chem Neurosci. 2017 Sep 20;8(9):1823-1829
pubmed: 28737885
CNS Drugs. 2017 Sep;31(9):759-776
pubmed: 28786085
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Jan;66(1):170-178
pubmed: 29131306
Neural Regen Res. 2017 Nov;12(11):1776-1779
pubmed: 29239314
Neural Regen Res. 2018 Oct;13(10):1719-1730
pubmed: 30136683
Gerontologist. 1969 Autumn;9(3):179-86
pubmed: 5349366
Am J Psychiatry. 1984 Nov;141(11):1356-64
pubmed: 6496779
Neurology. 1994 Dec;44(12):2308-14
pubmed: 7991117
Neurology. 1994 Dec;44(12):2315-21
pubmed: 7991118
Neurology. 1993 Nov;43(11):2412-4
pubmed: 8232972