Translaryngeal Tracheostomy Needle Introducer: a simple device to improve safety and reduce complications during Fantoni's translaryngeal tracheostomy procedure: trial on human cadavers.
3D printing
Complications
Digital fabrication
Needle introducer
Percutaneous
Safety
Tracheostomy
Translaryngeal tracheostomy
Journal
Intensive care medicine experimental
ISSN: 2197-425X
Titre abrégé: Intensive Care Med Exp
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101645149
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Jan 2019
28 Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
15
06
2018
accepted:
02
01
2019
entrez:
29
1
2019
pubmed:
29
1
2019
medline:
29
1
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) is the most frequently performed procedure in patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. A crucial step in such procedures is needle insertion into the trachea. To simplify this procedure and increase its safety, we developed a new device, the translaryngeal Tracheostomy Needle Introducer (tTNI), for use with Fantoni's method. This cadaver study was designed to assess the performance of the tTNI on human anatomy. We tested the tTNI in a cadaver laboratory; the operators included two experts trained in PDT and three without specific training in the procedure. We performed 58 needle insertion attempts on 13 cadavers. We compared the tTNI technique with the standard needle insertion approach using external landmarks. We recorded the number of attempts needed to optimise needle insertion, time required in seconds, final position of the needle and complications related to needle insertion. tTNI use resulted in fewer puncture attempts (1.91 ± 1.34 vs. 1.19 ± 0.5, p < 0.001), less time (36.8 ± 51.6 s vs. 13.14 ± 15.57 s, p < 0,001) and increased precision on the first puncture (18.87 ± 25.38° vs. 7.5 ± 12.95°, p < 0,005). We did not observe any complication with tTNI use, whereas complications found using the standard method were in line with the literature. The tTNI is a device that simplifies needle insertion by enhancing the accuracy of insertion with fewer attempts and higher precision, even when used by less experienced operators. Clinical testing is required to evaluate the device performance in patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) is the most frequently performed procedure in patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. A crucial step in such procedures is needle insertion into the trachea. To simplify this procedure and increase its safety, we developed a new device, the translaryngeal Tracheostomy Needle Introducer (tTNI), for use with Fantoni's method. This cadaver study was designed to assess the performance of the tTNI on human anatomy.
METHODS
METHODS
We tested the tTNI in a cadaver laboratory; the operators included two experts trained in PDT and three without specific training in the procedure. We performed 58 needle insertion attempts on 13 cadavers. We compared the tTNI technique with the standard needle insertion approach using external landmarks. We recorded the number of attempts needed to optimise needle insertion, time required in seconds, final position of the needle and complications related to needle insertion.
RESULTS
RESULTS
tTNI use resulted in fewer puncture attempts (1.91 ± 1.34 vs. 1.19 ± 0.5, p < 0.001), less time (36.8 ± 51.6 s vs. 13.14 ± 15.57 s, p < 0,001) and increased precision on the first puncture (18.87 ± 25.38° vs. 7.5 ± 12.95°, p < 0,005). We did not observe any complication with tTNI use, whereas complications found using the standard method were in line with the literature.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The tTNI is a device that simplifies needle insertion by enhancing the accuracy of insertion with fewer attempts and higher precision, even when used by less experienced operators. Clinical testing is required to evaluate the device performance in patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30689119
doi: 10.1186/s40635-019-0221-x
pii: 10.1186/s40635-019-0221-x
pmc: PMC6890899
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
9Références
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990 Jun;170(6):543-5
pubmed: 2343371
N Engl J Med. 2007 Apr 26;356(17):e15
pubmed: 17460222
Minerva Anestesiol. 2013 Feb;79(2):156-64
pubmed: 23174923
J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2015 Oct;22(4):357-64
pubmed: 26348694
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2013 Sep;22(5):291-6
pubmed: 23527683
A A Case Rep. 2016 Feb 15;6(4):77-9
pubmed: 26513675
Anesth Analg. 2003 Jan;96(1):229-32, table of contents
pubmed: 12505957
Med Intensiva. 2015 Mar;39(2):76-83
pubmed: 24598467
Clin Anat. 2013 Jul;26(5):564-71
pubmed: 23408386
Crit Care. 2018 Aug 17;22(1):195
pubmed: 30115127
Minerva Anestesiol. 1996 Oct;62(10):313-25
pubmed: 9102579
Acta Otolaryngol. 2016 Jun;136(6):598-605
pubmed: 26902954
Anesth Analg. 2000 Oct;91(4):882-6
pubmed: 11004042
Intensive Care Med. 1997 Apr;23(4):386-92
pubmed: 9142576