Progressive research collaborations and the limits of soft power.
Collaboration
Research practice
Responsible conduct of research
Soft power
Journal
Perspectives on medical education
ISSN: 2212-277X
Titre abrégé: Perspect Med Educ
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101590643
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2019
02 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
29
1
2019
medline:
25
2
2020
entrez:
29
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Collaboration in diverse teams is a central topic area in medical education, health research, and healthcare. As medical education researchers we implemented an internal grant policy to develop a progressive research partnership based on widely accepted guidelines for responsible conduct of research. Our intention was to proactively manage and guide group expectations around issues such as access to data and authorship. Our policy was based on 'soft power' principles, using the persuasiveness of ideas, relationships and inducements to encourage people to 'want what you want.' This article shares how we developed and implemented the policy, experienced first-hand the limits of soft power, and it explicates some of the lessons learned.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30689173
doi: 10.1007/s40037-019-0496-3
pii: 10.1007/s40037-019-0496-3
pmc: PMC6382625
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
28-32Références
Resnik DB, Elliott KC. The ethical challenges of socially responsible science. Account Res. 2016;23:31–46.
doi: 10.1080/08989621.2014.1002608
Shamoo AE, Resnik DB. Responsible conduct of research. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
Schreier AA, Wilson K, Resnik D. Academic research record-keeping: Best practices for individuals, group leaders, and institutions. Acad Med. 2006;81:42–7.
doi: 10.1097/00001888-200601000-00010
Street JM, Rogers WA, Israel M, Braunack-Mayer AJ. Credit where credit is due? Regulation, research integrity and the attribution of authorship in the health sciences. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70:1458–65.
doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.013
Steneck NH, Bulger RE. The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research. Acad Med. 2007;82:829–34.
doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7d4d
Sachs GA, Siegler M. Teaching scientific integrity and the responsible conduct of research. Acad Med. 1993;68:871–5.
doi: 10.1097/00001888-199312000-00001
Uijtdehaage S, Mavis B, Durning SJ. Whose Paper Is It Anyway? Authorship Criteria According to Established Scholars in Health Professions Education. Acad Med. 2018;93:1171–5.
doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002144
Tri-Agency Framework: Responsible Conduct of Research. Panel on Responsible Conduct of Research. 2016. http://www.rcr.ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique/framework-cadre/ . Retrieved: 14 July 2018.
Nye JS Jr. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: PublicAffairs; 2004.
Clinton HR. Hard Choices. New York: Simon & Schuster; 2014.
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council. Research Data Archiving Policy http://www.sshrc-crsh.gc.ca/about-au_sujet/policies-politiques/statements-enonces/edata-donnees_electroniques-eng.aspx Retrieved: 28 July, 2018.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors. http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html Retrieved: 28 July, 2018.