OlympiAD final overall survival and tolerability results: Olaparib versus chemotherapy treatment of physician's choice in patients with a germline BRCA mutation and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.


Journal

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology
ISSN: 1569-8041
Titre abrégé: Ann Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9007735

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 04 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 29 1 2019
medline: 21 4 2020
entrez: 29 1 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In the OlympiAD study, olaparib was shown to improve progression-free survival compared with chemotherapy treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients with a germline BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutation (BRCAm) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). We now report the planned final overall survival (OS) results, and describe the most common adverse events (AEs) to better understand olaparib tolerability in this population. OlympiAD, a Phase III, randomized, controlled, open-label study (NCT02000622), enrolled patients with a germline BRCAm and HER2-negative mBC who had received ≤2 lines of chemotherapy for mBC. Patients were randomized to olaparib tablets (300 mg bid) or predeclared TPC (capecitabine, vinorelbine, or eribulin). OS and safety were secondary end points. A total of 205 patients were randomized to olaparib and 97 to TPC. At 64% data maturity, median OS was 19.3 months with olaparib versus 17.1 months with TPC (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.66-1.23; P = 0.513); median follow-up was 25.3 and 26.3 months, respectively. HR for OS with olaparib versus TPC in prespecified subgroups were: prior chemotherapy for mBC [no (first-line setting): 0.51, 95% CI 0.29-0.90; yes (second/third-line): 1.13, 0.79-1.64]; receptor status (triple negative: 0.93, 0.62-1.43; hormone receptor positive: 0.86, 0.55-1.36); prior platinum (yes: 0.83, 0.49-1.45; no: 0.91, 0.64-1.33). Adverse events during olaparib treatment were generally low grade and manageable by supportive treatment or dose modification. There was a low rate of treatment discontinuation (4.9%), and the risk of developing anemia did not increase with extended olaparib exposure. While there was no statistically significant improvement in OS with olaparib compared to TPC, there was the possibility of meaningful OS benefit among patients who had not received chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Olaparib was generally well-tolerated, with no evidence of cumulative toxicity during extended exposure. Please see the article online for additional video content.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
In the OlympiAD study, olaparib was shown to improve progression-free survival compared with chemotherapy treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients with a germline BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutation (BRCAm) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). We now report the planned final overall survival (OS) results, and describe the most common adverse events (AEs) to better understand olaparib tolerability in this population.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
OlympiAD, a Phase III, randomized, controlled, open-label study (NCT02000622), enrolled patients with a germline BRCAm and HER2-negative mBC who had received ≤2 lines of chemotherapy for mBC. Patients were randomized to olaparib tablets (300 mg bid) or predeclared TPC (capecitabine, vinorelbine, or eribulin). OS and safety were secondary end points.
RESULTS
A total of 205 patients were randomized to olaparib and 97 to TPC. At 64% data maturity, median OS was 19.3 months with olaparib versus 17.1 months with TPC (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.66-1.23; P = 0.513); median follow-up was 25.3 and 26.3 months, respectively. HR for OS with olaparib versus TPC in prespecified subgroups were: prior chemotherapy for mBC [no (first-line setting): 0.51, 95% CI 0.29-0.90; yes (second/third-line): 1.13, 0.79-1.64]; receptor status (triple negative: 0.93, 0.62-1.43; hormone receptor positive: 0.86, 0.55-1.36); prior platinum (yes: 0.83, 0.49-1.45; no: 0.91, 0.64-1.33). Adverse events during olaparib treatment were generally low grade and manageable by supportive treatment or dose modification. There was a low rate of treatment discontinuation (4.9%), and the risk of developing anemia did not increase with extended olaparib exposure.
CONCLUSIONS
While there was no statistically significant improvement in OS with olaparib compared to TPC, there was the possibility of meaningful OS benefit among patients who had not received chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Olaparib was generally well-tolerated, with no evidence of cumulative toxicity during extended exposure. Please see the article online for additional video content.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30689707
pii: S0923-7534(19)31111-1
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz012
pmc: PMC6503629
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

BRCA1 Protein 0
BRCA1 protein, human 0
Phthalazines 0
Piperazines 0
Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors 0
Tablets 0
ERBB2 protein, human EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, ErbB-2 EC 2.7.10.1
olaparib WOH1JD9AR8

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase III Comparative Study Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

558-566

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

Références

J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 20;33(3):244-50
pubmed: 25366685
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 10;377(6):523-533
pubmed: 28578601
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb 1;33(4):304-11
pubmed: 25452441
Cancer Manag Res. 2018 Nov 08;10:5423-5431
pubmed: 30519090
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Apr;18(4):1084-91
pubmed: 19336551
Cancer Res. 2006 Aug 15;66(16):8297-308
pubmed: 16912212
N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 23;379(8):753-763
pubmed: 30110579

Auteurs

M E Robson (ME)

Breast Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York. Electronic address: robsonm@mskcc.org.

N Tung (N)

Cancer Risk and Prevention Program, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Dana-Farber Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, USA.

P Conte (P)

Division of Oncology, University of Padova, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy.

S-A Im (SA)

Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

E Senkus (E)

Center of Breast Diseases, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.

B Xu (B)

Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

N Masuda (N)

Department of Surgery, Osaka National Hospital, National Hospital Organization, Osaka, Japan.

S Delaloge (S)

Breast Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

W Li (W)

Department of Emergency, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

A Armstrong (A)

Medical Oncology, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

W Wu (W)

Global Medicines Development, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, USA.

C Goessl (C)

Global Medicines Development, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, USA.

S Runswick (S)

Global Medicines Development, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, UK.

S M Domchek (SM)

Department of Medicine, Basser Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH