Image-based clustering and connected component labeling for rapid automated left and right ventricular endocardial volume extraction and segmentation in full cardiac cycle multi-frame MRI images of cardiac patients.
Cardiac MRI
Image processing
Image segmentation
Left ventricular endocardial volume
Medical imaging
Journal
Medical & biological engineering & computing
ISSN: 1741-0444
Titre abrégé: Med Biol Eng Comput
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7704869
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
received:
27
03
2017
accepted:
10
01
2019
pubmed:
29
1
2019
medline:
16
11
2019
entrez:
29
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A rapid method for left and right ventricular endocardial volume segmentation and clinical cardiac parameter calculation from MRI images of cardiac patients is presented. The clinical motivation is providing cardiologists a tool for assessing the cardiac function in a patient through the left ventricular endocardial volume's ejection fraction. A new method combining adapted fuzzy membership-based c-means pixel clustering and connected regions component labeling is used for automatic segmentation of the left and right ventricular endocardial volumes. This proposed pixel clustering with labeling approach avoids manual initialization or user intervention and does not require specifying the region of interest. This method fully automatically extracts the left and right ventricular endocardial volumes and avoids manual tracing on all MRI image frames in the complete cardiac cycle from systole to diastole. The average computational processing time per frame is 0.6 s, making it much more efficient than deformable methods, which need several iterations for the evolution of the snake or contour. Accuracy of the automated method presented herein was validated against manual tracing-based extraction, performed with the guidance of cardiac experts, on several MRI frames. Dice coefficients between the proposed automatic versus manual traced ventricular endocardial volume segmentations were observed to be 0.9781 ± 0.0070 (for left ventricular endocardial volume) and 0.9819 ± 0.0058 (for right ventricular endocardial volume), and the Pearson correlation coefficients were observed to be 0.9655 ± 0.0206 (for left ventricular endocardial volume) and 0.9870 ± 0.0131 (for right ventricular endocardial volume). Graphical abstract The left ventricular endocardial volume segmentation methodology illustrated as a series of algorithms.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30690663
doi: 10.1007/s11517-019-01952-9
pii: 10.1007/s11517-019-01952-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1213-1228Références
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003 Jun;22(6):773-6
pubmed: 12872953
Med Image Anal. 2004 Sep;8(3):245-54
pubmed: 15450219
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2004;6(4):837-44
pubmed: 15646887
Comput Biol Med. 2006 Apr;36(4):389-407
pubmed: 15925359
Radiology. 2005 Jul;236(1):57-64
pubmed: 15955850
Circulation. 1992 Jul;86(1):159-66
pubmed: 1617769
Eur Radiol. 2006 May;16(5):1117-23
pubmed: 16372162
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2007;9(5):777-83
pubmed: 17891615
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1995;14(1):56-64
pubmed: 18215810
IEEE Trans Image Process. 1998;7(12):1673-83
pubmed: 18276234
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2008 Sep;46(9):841-8
pubmed: 18626675
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2009 Mar;47(3):313-22
pubmed: 18853215
Med Image Anal. 2011 Apr;15(2):169-84
pubmed: 21216179
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2017 Sep;55(9):1563-1577
pubmed: 28160219