Effect of osteochondral graft orientation in a biotribological test system.
cartilage
mechanobiology
synovium & osteoarthritis
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society
ISSN: 1554-527X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8404726
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2019
03 2019
Historique:
received:
16
03
2018
accepted:
11
01
2019
pubmed:
29
1
2019
medline:
2
11
2019
entrez:
29
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Autologous osteochondral transplantation (AOT) utilizing autografts is a widely used technique for the treatment of small-to-medium cartilage defects occurring in knee and ankle joints. The application of viable cartilage and bone ensures proper integration, early weight bearing, as well as restoration of biomechanical and biotribological properties. However, alignment of the autografts onto the defect site remains a pivotal aspect of reinstating the properties of the joint toward successful autograft integration. This is the first study to perform tests with different orientations of osteochondral grafts in a cartilage-on-cartilage test system. The objective was to estimate if there are differences between aligned and 90°-rotated grafts concerning molecular biological and biomechanical parameters. Tissue viability, assessed by XTT assay indicated lower metabolic activity in tested osteochondral grafts (aligned, p = 0.0148 and 90°-rotated, p = 0.0760) in favor of a higher anabolic gene expression (aligned, p = 0.0030 and 90°-rotated, 0.0027). Tissue structure was evaluated by Safranin O histology and microscopic images of the surface. Aligned and 90°-rotated grafts revealed no apparent differences between proteoglycan content or cracks and fissures on the cartilage surface. Test medium analyzed after tribological tests for their sulfated glycosaminoglycan content revealed no differences (p = 0.3282). During the tests, both the friction coefficient and the relative displacement between the two cartilage surfaces were measured, with no significant difference in both parameters (COF, p = 0.2232 and relative displacement, p = 0.3185). From the methods we deployed, this study can infer that there are no differences between aligned and 90°-rotated osteochondral grafts after tribological tests in the used ex vivo tissue model. © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Orthopaedic Research® Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society. J Orthop Res.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30690777
doi: 10.1002/jor.24236
pmc: PMC6594111
doi:
Substances chimiques
Glycosaminoglycans
0
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
583-592Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. Journal of Orthopaedic Research® Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society.
Références
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011 Oct;4(7):1311-7
pubmed: 21783140
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2017 Jul 1;155:294-303
pubmed: 28437755
Open Orthop J. 2009 Aug 06;3:61-8
pubmed: 19696917
IEEE Trans Nanobioscience. 2015 Oct;14(7):716-21
pubmed: 26415204
Ann Biomed Eng. 2016 Aug;44(8):2577-2588
pubmed: 26698580
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2007 Apr;221(3):263-79
pubmed: 17539582
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2015 Dec;229(12):879-88
pubmed: 26614801
Biotribology (Oxf). 2017 Mar;9:1-11
pubmed: 29242820
Med Eng Phys. 2008 Dec;30(10):1349-63
pubmed: 18993107
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2015 Dec;8(4):423-8
pubmed: 26381671
MethodsX. 2017 Oct 25;4:423-428
pubmed: 29124019
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Nov;85(11):2111-20
pubmed: 14630839
J Orthop Res. 2013 Jun;31(6):887-93
pubmed: 23335281
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013 Oct;26:127-35
pubmed: 23746699
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011 Jun;97(4):418-29
pubmed: 21602114
Eur Cell Mater. 2015 Jun 30;29:356-69; discussion 369
pubmed: 26122871
Cartilage. 2016 Jul;7(3):265-73
pubmed: 27375842
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Jan;23(1):161-9
pubmed: 25281916
Glycobiology. 2003 Sep;13(9):647-53
pubmed: 12773478
J Anat. 2014 Nov;225(5):519-26
pubmed: 25146377
Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2000;2:691-713
pubmed: 11701528
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2015 May;26(5):186
pubmed: 25893393
Int Orthop. 2016 Jul;40(7):1553-8
pubmed: 26660516
J Exp Orthop. 2016 Dec;3(1):31
pubmed: 27813019
Knee. 2014 Jan;21(1):119-25
pubmed: 23583005
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Sep;23(9):1506-12
pubmed: 25937025