New indicators and indexes for benchmarking university-industry-government innovation in medical and life science clusters: results from the European FP7 Regions of Knowledge HealthTIES project.
European Union
Regional innovation cluster
Regions of Knowledge
biotechnology
innovation index
life sciences
medical sciences
public policy
triple helix
university–industry–government innovation
Journal
Health research policy and systems
ISSN: 1478-4505
Titre abrégé: Health Res Policy Syst
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101170481
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Jan 2019
28 Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
25
07
2018
accepted:
07
01
2019
entrez:
30
1
2019
pubmed:
30
1
2019
medline:
14
5
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
While the European Union is striving to become the 'Innovation Union', there remains a lack of quantifiable indicators to compare and benchmark regional innovation clusters. To address this issue, a HealthTIES (Healthcare, Technology and Innovation for Economic Success) consortium was funded by the European Union's Regions of Knowledge initiative, research and innovation funding programme FP7. HealthTIES examined whether the health technology innovation cycle was functioning differently in five European regional innovation clusters and proposed regional and joint actions to improve their performance. The clusters included BioCat (Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain), Medical Delta (Leiden, Rotterdam and Delft, South Holland, Netherlands), Oxford and Thames Valley (United Kingdom), Life Science Zürich (Switzerland), and Innova Észak-Alföld (Debrecen, Hungary). Appreciation of the 'triple helix' of university-industry-government innovation provided the impetus for the development of two quantifiable innovation indexes and related indicators. The HealthTIES H-index is calculated for disease and technology platforms based on the h-index proposed by Hirsch. The HealthTIES Innovation Index is calculated for regions based on 32 relevant quantitative and discriminative indicators grouped into 12 categories and 3 innovation phases, namely 'Input' (n = 12), 'Innovation System' (n = 9) and 'Output' (n = 11). The HealthTIES regions had developed relatively similar disease and technology platform profiles, yet with distinctive strengths and weaknesses. The regional profiles of the innovation cycle in each of the three phases were surprisingly divergent. Comparative assessments based on the indicators and indexes helped identify and share best practice and inform regional and joint action plans to strengthen the competitiveness of the HealthTIES regions. The HealthTIES indicators and indexes provide useful practical tools for the measurement and benchmarking of university-industry-government innovation in European medical and life science clusters. They are validated internally within the HealthTIES consortium and appear to have a degree of external prima facie validity. Potentially, the tools and accompanying analyses can be used beyond the HealthTIES consortium to inform other regional governments, researchers and, possibly, large companies searching for their next location, analyse and benchmark 'triple helix' dynamics within their own networks over time, and to develop integrated public-private and cross-regional research and innovation strategies in Europe and beyond.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
While the European Union is striving to become the 'Innovation Union', there remains a lack of quantifiable indicators to compare and benchmark regional innovation clusters. To address this issue, a HealthTIES (Healthcare, Technology and Innovation for Economic Success) consortium was funded by the European Union's Regions of Knowledge initiative, research and innovation funding programme FP7. HealthTIES examined whether the health technology innovation cycle was functioning differently in five European regional innovation clusters and proposed regional and joint actions to improve their performance. The clusters included BioCat (Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain), Medical Delta (Leiden, Rotterdam and Delft, South Holland, Netherlands), Oxford and Thames Valley (United Kingdom), Life Science Zürich (Switzerland), and Innova Észak-Alföld (Debrecen, Hungary).
METHODS
METHODS
Appreciation of the 'triple helix' of university-industry-government innovation provided the impetus for the development of two quantifiable innovation indexes and related indicators. The HealthTIES H-index is calculated for disease and technology platforms based on the h-index proposed by Hirsch. The HealthTIES Innovation Index is calculated for regions based on 32 relevant quantitative and discriminative indicators grouped into 12 categories and 3 innovation phases, namely 'Input' (n = 12), 'Innovation System' (n = 9) and 'Output' (n = 11).
RESULTS
RESULTS
The HealthTIES regions had developed relatively similar disease and technology platform profiles, yet with distinctive strengths and weaknesses. The regional profiles of the innovation cycle in each of the three phases were surprisingly divergent. Comparative assessments based on the indicators and indexes helped identify and share best practice and inform regional and joint action plans to strengthen the competitiveness of the HealthTIES regions.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The HealthTIES indicators and indexes provide useful practical tools for the measurement and benchmarking of university-industry-government innovation in European medical and life science clusters. They are validated internally within the HealthTIES consortium and appear to have a degree of external prima facie validity. Potentially, the tools and accompanying analyses can be used beyond the HealthTIES consortium to inform other regional governments, researchers and, possibly, large companies searching for their next location, analyse and benchmark 'triple helix' dynamics within their own networks over time, and to develop integrated public-private and cross-regional research and innovation strategies in Europe and beyond.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30691504
doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0414-5
pii: 10.1186/s12961-019-0414-5
pmc: PMC6350323
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
10Subventions
Organisme : Seventh Framework Programme
ID : 265550
Organisme : European Institute of Innovation and Technology
ID : EIT Health-Rare Cancer KIC Stage 1
Organisme : Health Services Research Programme
ID : Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
Références
Harv Bus Rev. 1998 Nov-Dec;76(6):77-90
pubmed: 10187248
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Nov 15;102(46):16569-72
pubmed: 16275915
Acad Med. 2012 Jun;87(6):709-18
pubmed: 22534590
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Dec 23;12:478
pubmed: 23259467
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013 Jan;12(1):14-5
pubmed: 23274462
Lancet. 2014 Jan 18;383(9913):257-66
pubmed: 24411650
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 08;14:552
pubmed: 25380727
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jan 22;15:25
pubmed: 25608775
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Jul 19;14(1):50
pubmed: 27432056
Hum Resour Health. 2017 Jan 6;15(1):2
pubmed: 28061790
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Feb 22;15(1):13
pubmed: 28228133
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Aug 14;15(1):70
pubmed: 28806989