Review: Insects and former foodstuffs for upgrading food waste biomasses/streams to feed ingredients for farm animals.

alternative feed ingredients energy sources ex-food novel feed protein sources

Journal

Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience
ISSN: 1751-732X
Titre abrégé: Animal
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101303270

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 30 1 2019
medline: 24 8 2019
entrez: 30 1 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The increasing global need to find alternative protein/energy sources has triggered research in the field of non-conventional feed ingredients, with insects and former foodstuffs being the most promising. Insects contain high level of protein and fat, whereas former foodstuffs contain high energy in the form of carbohydrates and fats; therefore, both should be considered as promising alternative feed ingredients for livestock production. In addition to the nutritional value, they also represent a way by which food waste biomasses/streams can be upgraded to valuable feed ingredients. This review outlines the main nutritional and safety issues of insects and former foodstuffs, and also considers the legal framework involved. The importance of the type of insect metamorphosis and tailored substrates that could lead to the production of a premium feed is also described. This is also the first time that a review discusses the nutritional quality of former foodstuffs. Energy and the main nutrient content of former foodstuff are compared with the composition of common cereals as the principal energy sources in animal feed. For both ingredients a critical review of the safety issues is provided. Based on the current data available, both insects and former foodstuffs have an excellent potential use as alternative feed ingredients for livestock production. When produced in line with the criteria set by major feed/food authorities, they are characterized by high quality and safety standards. This makes them comparable to other feed materials and ingredients currently available on the market, although their full nutritional, functional, safety and sustainability evaluation cannot be considered complete.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30691544
pii: S1751731118003622
doi: 10.1017/S1751731118003622
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

1365-1375

Auteurs

L Pinotti (L)

1Department of Health,Animal Science and Food Safety,University of Milan,Milan20134,Italy.

C Giromini (C)

1Department of Health,Animal Science and Food Safety,University of Milan,Milan20134,Italy.

M Ottoboni (M)

1Department of Health,Animal Science and Food Safety,University of Milan,Milan20134,Italy.

M Tretola (M)

1Department of Health,Animal Science and Food Safety,University of Milan,Milan20134,Italy.

D Marchis (D)

2Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte,Liguria e Valle d'Aosta,Turin,Italy.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH