Pattern of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension in Indian Population.
Headache
idiopathic intracranial hypertension
obesity
papilledema
transverse sinus stenosis
Journal
Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
ISSN: 0972-2327
Titre abrégé: Ann Indian Acad Neurol
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101273955
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
30
1
2019
pubmed:
30
1
2019
medline:
30
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the clinical and demographic profile, laboratory parameters and outcomes of Idiopathic Intracranial hypertension (IIH) patients from Indian subpopulation. We did a prospective study on patients who fulfilled the revised diagnostic criteria for Primary pseudotumor cerebri syndrome in adults and children, proposed by Friedman et al in 2013. All patients were examined for BMI, papilloedema, extraocular muscle movement, opening CSF pressure and underwent MRI, MR venography of brain and perimetry. Patients were followed up for a minimum period of 6 months, upto 2 years, with the outcomes monitored being visual acuity, visual field, headache, diplopia and optic disc changes. We evaluated 33 patients (31 female and 2 male). 25 patients had BMI less than 25. Commonest clinical presentation was headache. 7 patients showed normal CSF opening pressure. The most common MRI finding was flattening of posterior aspect of globe and was found in 90.90% (30). 25 patients showed either unilateral or bilateral transverse sinus stenosis. Most common finding in perimetry was enlarged blind spot. 4 patients recovered spontaneously and rests were treated with acetazolamide (1gm/day). All showed favorable outcome when followed up. Obesity may not be a dominant risk factor for development of IIH in the Indian subcontinent. Non obese IIH have better prognosis and tend to have a good response to medical management alone.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30692759
doi: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_116_18
pii: AIAN-22-47
pmc: PMC6327693
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
47-51Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
There are no conflicts of interest.
Références
Neurology. 2004 Nov 9;63(9):1737-9
pubmed: 15534272
Lancet. 2005 Sep 24-30;366(9491):1059-62
pubmed: 16182882
Lancet Neurol. 2006 May;5(5):433-42
pubmed: 16632314
Neurology. 2008 Mar 11;70(11):861-7
pubmed: 18332344
Eur J Neurol. 2008 Aug;15(8):876-9
pubmed: 18684312
Neurology. 1991 Feb;41(2 ( Pt 1)):239-44
pubmed: 1992368
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2010 Jan;13(1):37-41
pubmed: 20436745
Neurol Clin. 2010 Aug;28(3):593-617
pubmed: 20637991
Rev Neurol Dis. 2010 Spring-Summer;7(2-3):e56-68
pubmed: 20944524
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2011 Mar;55(2):138-42
pubmed: 21400059
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2011 Jan;14(1):19-22
pubmed: 21633609
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Dec;32(11):1986-93
pubmed: 21680652
J Neuroophthalmol. 2013 Mar;33(1):4-8
pubmed: 22217456
J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2012 Jan;3(1):52-9
pubmed: 22690052
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2013 Apr;16(2):229-33
pubmed: 23956571
Neurology. 2013 Sep 24;81(13):1159-65
pubmed: 23966248
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013 Nov;61(11):681-2
pubmed: 24145570
Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2014 Winter;54(1):1-11
pubmed: 24296367
JAMA Neurol. 2014 Jun;71(6):693-701
pubmed: 24756302
Neurology. 2014 Jul 8;83(2):198-9
pubmed: 25002568
Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jan-Mar;29(1):26-31
pubmed: 25859136
Turk Neurosurg. 2017;27(2):208-211
pubmed: 27593779
Acta Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov;96(7):719-723
pubmed: 29405582
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1982 Jan;45(1):13-8
pubmed: 7062066
Arch Neurol. 1982 Aug;39(8):461-74
pubmed: 7103794
J Neuroophthalmol. 1996 Dec;16(4):241-6
pubmed: 8956158