In vitro validation of near-infrared transillumination at 780 nm for the detection of caries on proximal surfaces.
Caries detection
In vitro
Near-infrared light
Proximal caries
Transillumination
X-ray microtomography
Journal
Clinical oral investigations
ISSN: 1436-3771
Titre abrégé: Clin Oral Investig
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9707115
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Nov 2019
Historique:
received:
19
09
2018
accepted:
16
01
2019
pubmed:
30
1
2019
medline:
7
1
2020
entrez:
30
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of the present in vitro study was to determine the ability of Diagnocam to detect caries at an early stage and to compare it with digital radiography. One hundred twenty proximal surfaces composed equally of sound and decayed surfaces were evaluated by assessing images captured with Diagnocam (Kavo, Biberach, Germany) and digital radiography (DR). All images were assessed twice by two calibrated dentists with a minimum interval of 2 weeks between examinations. The results were compared with μCT scans. Inter-rater reliability showed nearly perfect agreement; a high intra-rater reliability was calculated. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients showed a strong correlation of Diagnocam and μCT (0.82). DR and μCT achieved a slightly lower correlation (0.73). The surfaces were categorized into sound surfaces, enamel lesions, and dentin lesions to determine intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), sensitivity and specificity. ICCs between μCT and DR ranged from 0.20 to 0.63. ICCs between Diagnocam and DR were higher in all categories and ranged from 0.56 to 0.83. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of Diagnocam achieved mostly higher values than DR. In detecting enamel lesions, sensitivity was 0.36 for DR and 0.59 for the DC. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of Diagnocam were larger than those of DR in all categories. Diagnocam is more capable of detecting initial proximal lesions than DR and also has a higher sensitivity for dentin lesions. However, caries progression in dentin cannot be reliably determined with Diagnocam. Diagnocam may be suitable as a supplement to X-ray diagnostics in clinical use.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30693402
doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02824-0
pii: 10.1007/s00784-019-02824-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Pagination
3933-3940Références
Clin Oral Investig. 2008 Sep;12(3):217-23
pubmed: 18210170
Appl Opt. 1995 Mar 1;34(7):1278-85
pubmed: 21037659
BMC Oral Health. 2017 Nov 16;17(1):130
pubmed: 29145846
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018 Jan;30(1):39-44
pubmed: 29171167
Helv Odontol Acta. 1966 Apr;10(1):1-18
pubmed: 4379484
Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):676-82
pubmed: 22743772
Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Nov;48(9):828-836
pubmed: 27389018
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2002 Feb;109(2):47-50
pubmed: 11933565
Int J Esthet Dent. 2015 Spring;10(1):158-65
pubmed: 25625132
J Dent Res. 2006 Oct;85(10):955-9
pubmed: 16998140
Opt Express. 2005 Jan 24;13(2):573-82
pubmed: 19488387
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1999 Oct;27(5):331-7
pubmed: 10503793
J Dent Res. 2018 Jul;97(7):844-849
pubmed: 29481761
J Dent. 2018 Mar;70:40-45
pubmed: 29258850
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004 Dec;98(6):730-7
pubmed: 15583548
J Dent. 2017 Jan;56:105-111
pubmed: 27884718
Quintessence Int. 2014 Jun;45(6):531-8
pubmed: 24618570
J Dent. 2017 Aug;63:44-50
pubmed: 28559050
Opt Express. 2003 Sep 8;11(18):2259-65
pubmed: 19466117
J Dent. 2012 Jan;40(1):35-40
pubmed: 21930181
Caries Res. 1984;18(2):141-8
pubmed: 6583007
Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Aug;32(6):1417-1422
pubmed: 28653255
Appl Opt. 2009 Jul 1;48(19):3742-9
pubmed: 19571932
Braz Oral Res. 2015;29(1):S1806-83242015000100309
pubmed: 26892360
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999 May;28(3):132-6
pubmed: 10740465
J Biomed Opt. 2006 May-Jun;11(3):34023
pubmed: 16822072
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 May;20(4):821-9
pubmed: 26374746
J Dent. 2015 Aug;43(8):924-33
pubmed: 25724114