Impact of vertical versus horizontal vaginal cuff closure on vaginal length following hysterectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Dyspareunia
Horizontal
Hysterectomy
Meta-analysis
Vaginal cuff
Vertical
Journal
International urogynecology journal
ISSN: 1433-3023
Titre abrégé: Int Urogynecol J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101567041
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2019
08 2019
Historique:
received:
12
11
2018
accepted:
14
01
2019
pubmed:
30
1
2019
medline:
9
4
2020
entrez:
30
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Posthysterectomy vaginal length has been previously associated with postoperative sexual dysfunction, but evidence for this in the literature is controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate whether vertical or horizontal closure of the vaginal cuff has a direct effect on posthysterectomy vaginal length and on postoperative sexual dysfunction. The study was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched Medline, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov , EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar databases. Overall, five randomized trials were included in this meta-analysis with 223 patients. The results suggest that horizontal closure of the vaginal cuff results in a shorter vaginal length compared with vertical closure [mean difference (MD) -0.77 cm, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.12 to -0.43]. Mean vaginal length significantly decreased when the horizontal method was used (MD -0.61 cm, 95% CI -0.97 to -0.24). The subgroup analysis revealed that vertical closure was associated with longer vaginal length only in cases treated with vaginal hysterectomy. Trial sequential analysis revealed that our meta-analysis had adequate power to support these results. Postoperative sexual function was evaluated in only one study; no differences were observed. Findings of our meta-analysis suggest that horizontal closure of the vaginal vault results in shorter vaginal length in vaginal hysterectomies; thus, we suggest that this technique be avoided. Data concerning quality of life of patients and specifically sexual dysfunction remain extremely limited and should be studied in future trials.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30694343
doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03881-5
pii: 10.1007/s00192-019-03881-5
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1239-1245Références
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959 Apr;22(4):719-48
pubmed: 13655060
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;27(6):504-8
pubmed: 26536212
Contemp Clin Trials. 2007 Feb;28(2):105-14
pubmed: 16807131
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Nov-Dec;22(6S):S77
pubmed: 27679335
Control Clin Trials. 1996 Feb;17(1):1-12
pubmed: 8721797
BMC Womens Health. 2009 Apr 20;9:9
pubmed: 19379514
Clin Interv Aging. 2014 Nov 13;9:1939-50
pubmed: 25419123
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Jun;29(6):905-912
pubmed: 29687171
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;114(5):1156-8
pubmed: 20168127
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec;195(6):1805-8
pubmed: 17132483
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):e1-34
pubmed: 19631507
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Aug;151(2):190-2
pubmed: 20427116
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Sep-Oct;21(5):884-7
pubmed: 24747553
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2015 Jan;145:139-43
pubmed: 25201455
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Jan 1;24(1):108-113
pubmed: 27702701
CMAJ. 2007 Apr 10;176(8):1091-6
pubmed: 17420491
Climacteric. 2016 Apr;19(2):151-61
pubmed: 26707589
Health Care Women Int. 2012;33(6):525-39
pubmed: 22577740
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec;195(6):1846-50
pubmed: 17014819
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Nov;206:1-5
pubmed: 27612212
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Aug;49(8):609-15
pubmed: 25354863
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):1010-4
pubmed: 24780383
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 Feb;26(2):116-21
pubmed: 26671303
Curr Sex Health Rep. 2014;6(4):244-251
pubmed: 25999801
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Aug;122(2 Pt 1):233-41
pubmed: 23969789
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Sep-Oct;23(6):986-93
pubmed: 27426680
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;58(3):476-91
pubmed: 26125962
Maturitas. 2012 Aug;72(4):296-304
pubmed: 22704291