7-0? That is awful! Should I trust my national team again?: The role of mindsets in team trust.
Consumer behaviour
Football
Implicit theories
Mindsets
Team trust
Journal
International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie
ISSN: 1464-066X
Titre abrégé: Int J Psychol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0107305
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
16
03
2018
accepted:
25
12
2018
pubmed:
31
1
2019
medline:
11
6
2020
entrez:
31
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This investigation examined the role of mindsets in team trust after a major loss. It is proposed that individuals can believe that personal characteristics are fixed and that there is not much one can do about it (a fixed mindset) or that personal characteristics are malleable and that one can improve (a growth mindset). The participants, self-identified football fans, were shown a picture of a major loss experienced by the Mexican national team and then answered questions that assessed the participants' team trust, intention to provide future support, and mindsets. We conceptualised mindsets as latent variables and classes to test our hypotheses. The results from the latent variable model showed a significant, positive influence of a growth mindset on team trust. Similarly, the results from the latent class model showed that the class characterised by high levels of a growth mindset was more likely to trust the national team. Regarding intentions to provide future support to the national team, a growth mindset had an indirect, positive effect through its influence on team trust. Similarly, the class with high levels of a growth mindset was more likely to support the national team in the future. The implications for social psychology and consumer behaviour are discussed.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
315-322Informations de copyright
© 2019 International Union of Psychological Science.
Références
Aaker, J. L., Fournier, S., & Brasel, S. A. (2004). When good brands do bad. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 1-16.
Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: 3-step approaches using Mplus [Webnote 15]. Retrieved from https://www.statmodel.com/download/webnotes/webnote15.pdf
Bauer, H. H., Stokburger-Sauer, N. E., & Exler, S. (2008). Brand image and fan loyalty in professional team sport: A refined model and empirical assessment. Journal of Sport Management, 22, 205-226.
Bergman, L. R., & Andersson, H. (2010). The person and the variable in developmental psychology. Journal of Psychology, 218, 155-165.
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Bühler, A., & Nufer, G. (2016). Relationship marketing in sports: Building and establishing longstanding relations in the business of sports. In S. Chadwick, N. Chanavat, & M. Desbordes (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sports marketing (pp. 207-221). New York, NY: Routledge.
Business Insider. (2014). Brazil loses 7-1 in the most shocking meltdown in World Cup history. Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/brazil-germany-score-2014-7
Carlson, J., & O'Cass, A. (2012). Optimizing the online channel in professional sport to create trusting and loyal consumers: The role of the professional sports team brand and service quality. Journal of Sport Management, 26, 463-478.
Chadwick, S. (2009). From outside lane to inside track: Sport management research in the twenty-first century. Management Decision, 47, 191-203.
Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65, 81-93.
Chi, T., & Kilduff, P. P. D. (2011). Understanding consumer perceived value of casual sportswear: An empirical study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 18, 422-429.
Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997). An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61, 35-51.
Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Dweck, C. S. (2008). Can personality be changed?: The role of beliefs in personality and change. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 391-394.
Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 343-373.
Haselhuhn, M. P., Schweitzer, M. E., & Wood, A. (2010). How implicit beliefs influence trust recovery. Psychological Science, 21, 645-648.
Ho-Jin, L., & Yongseok, J. (2016). The impacts of brand asset of domestic screen golf playing systems upon brand trust and brand loyalty. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 17, 320-332.
Jang, W., Ko, Y. J., & Chan-Olmsted, S. M. (2015). Spectator-based sports team reputation: Scale development and validation. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 16, 52-72.
Karwowski, M. (2014). Creative mindsets: Measurement, correlates, consequences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 62-70.
Kim, Y. K., Trail, G., & Ko, Y. J. (2011). The influence of relationship quality on sport consumption behaviors: An empirical examination of the relationship quality framework. Journal of Sport Management, 25, 576-592.
Levy, S. R., Stroessner, S. J., & Dweck, C. (1998). Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1421-1436.
Liu, D., & Guo, X. (2017). Can trust and social benefit really help? Empirical examination of purchase intentions for wearable devices. Information Development, 33, 43-56.
Masyn, K. (2013). Latent class analysis and finite mixture modeling. In T. D. Little (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 551-611). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Murphy, M. C., & Dweck, C. S. (2010). A culture of genius: How an organization's lay theory shapes people's cognition, affect, and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 283-296.
Murphy, M. C., & Dweck, C. S. (2016). Mindset shape consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26, 127-136.
Plaks, J. E. (2017). Implicit theories: Assumptions that shape social and moral cognition. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 259-310.
Record. (2016). The most painful loss. Retrieved from http://www.record.com.mx/futbol-noticias-del-tri/elige-la-derrota-mas-dolorosa-del-tri
West, S. G., Taylor, A. B., & Wu, W. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 209-231). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Wheeler, S. C., & Omair, A. (2016). Potential growth areas for implicit theories research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26, 137-141.
Wu, S., Tsai, C. D., & Hung, C. (2012). Toward team or player? How trust, vicarious achievement motive, and identification affect fan loyalty. Journal of Sport Management, 26, 177-191.
Xie, Y., Batra, R., & Peng, S. (2015). An extended model of preference formation between global and local brands: The roles of identity expressiveness, trust, and affect. Journal of International Marketing, 23, 50-71.
Yin, C.-Y., Yu, H.-Y., & Poon, P. (2016). Consumers' attributions and brand evaluations in product-harm crises: The role of implicit theories of personality. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 15, 87-95.