Differences in Pre-Laying Behavior between Floor-Laying and Nest-Laying Pekin Ducks.

Pekin duck competition floor laying nesting behavior

Journal

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 Jan 2019
Historique:
received: 12 12 2018
revised: 21 01 2019
accepted: 22 01 2019
entrez: 1 2 2019
pubmed: 1 2 2019
medline: 1 2 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Floor-laying in commercially farmed Pekin ducks is not well understood. This exploratory study aimed to determine if behavioral differences exist between floor-laying and nest-laying ducks. Retrospective analysis of video footage from a small commercial breeding flock (n = 60 birds) was used to quantify the behavior of floor-laying and nest-laying birds (n = 24 events per group) in the hour prior to oviposition site selection. The frequency, percentage of time spent, and duration of bouts were compared for nest box interactions, behaviors inside and outside of boxes and aggressive interactions. Some floor-laying birds did not enter or investigate nest boxes (FL-Out), whilst some floor-layers (FL-In) used nest boxes similarly to nest-laying birds (NL). Nest-building behavior differed only in location, with FL-Out performing the behavior on the shed floor and the other groups performing it primarily in boxes. FL-Out sat more, walked less, and engaged in less aggression (

Identifiants

pubmed: 30699974
pii: ani9020040
doi: 10.3390/ani9020040
pmc: PMC6406234
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Poultry CRC of Australia
ID : Postgraduate scholarship

Références

Br Poult Sci. 2005 Feb;46(1):9-15
pubmed: 15835246
Poult Sci. 2011 Jun;90(6):1179-84
pubmed: 21597056
Poult Sci. 2011 Oct;90(10):2153-61
pubmed: 21933995
Poult Sci. 2012 Apr;91(4):808-16
pubmed: 22399718
Poult Sci. 2013 Apr;92(4):890-9
pubmed: 23472011
Behav Processes. 1997 Apr;40(1):13-25
pubmed: 24897609
Br Poult Sci. 1985 Jul;26(3):367-73
pubmed: 4027739
Anim Behav. 1972 Aug;20(3):444-51
pubmed: 4676784
Behav Neurosci. 1984 Oct;98(5):868-83
pubmed: 6541501
Br Poult Sci. 1996 May;37(2):245-53
pubmed: 8773834
Anim Behav. 1997 Aug;54(2):313-9
pubmed: 9268462

Auteurs

Lorelle Barrett (L)

School of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia. lorelle.barrett@research.uwa.edu.au.
Poultry CRC, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia. lorelle.barrett@research.uwa.edu.au.

Irek Malecki (I)

Milne AgriGroup Ltd., Welshpool, Perth, WA 6106, Australia. imalecki@iinet.net.au.

Dominique Blache (D)

School of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia. dominique.blache@uwa.edu.au.

Classifications MeSH