Examining Barriers and Facilitators to Delivering SNAP-Ed Direct Nutrition Education in Rural Communities.


Journal

American journal of health promotion : AJHP
ISSN: 2168-6602
Titre abrégé: Am J Health Promot
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8701680

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 1 2 2019
medline: 19 5 2020
entrez: 1 2 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To better understand the barriers to implementing Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Education (SNAP-Ed) direct education programming in rural communities, as well as strategies to overcome these barriers. This includes (1) barriers to implementing direct education in rural communities, and (2) facilitators to overcoming direct-education barriers in rural communities. This was a qualitative study that included in-depth interviews. Fifteen states across all 7 SNAP-Ed regions. Participants were eligible if they (1) were SNAP-Ed staff who were involved with implementing programs; (2) implemented at least 50% of their programming in rural communities, and (3) worked in their role for at least 12 months. Twenty-seven (n = 27) staff participated in interviews. Online surveys ascertained if participants were interested in participating in a 60-minute interview about implementing SNAP-Ed in rural communities. Interviews were semistructured and focused on the barriers and facilitators to implementing SNAP-Ed direct-education nutrition programming in rural areas. Qualitative interviews were analyzed using content analysis in Atlas.ti. Barriers to implementing direct education in rural communities included lack of healthy food and physical activity infrastructure to reinforce messages taught in class, funding restrictions, transportation for SNAP-Ed staff and the perception that this was also a problem for participants, and SNAP-Ed staff being seen as "outsiders" (not from the community). Facilitators included partnering with other organizations to increase recruitment and retention of SNAP-Ed participants, buy-in from local leaders, and SNAP-Ed staff being from the community. Partnerships between SNAP-Ed programs and non-SNAP-Ed organizations were essential in helping to recruit and retain participants. The SNAP-Ed staff should get buy-in from local leaders before starting direct-education programming. The SNAP-Ed programs should explore innovative delivery modalities including online and text messaging due to transportation issues in widespread rural geographies. Lastly, more work should be done to complement SNAP-Ed direct education with policy, systems, and environmental change initiatives.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30700096
doi: 10.1177/0890117118821845
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Pagination

736-744

Auteurs

Lindsey Haynes-Maslow (L)

1 Department of Agricultural and Human Sciences, NC State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.

Isabel Osborne (I)

2 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Stephanie Jilcott Pitts (SJ)

3 Department of Public Health, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH