The complete chloroplast genomes of three Betulaceae species: implications for molecular phylogeny and historical biogeography.
Ancestral areas reconstruction
Betulaceae
Chloroplast genome
Comparative genomics
Divergence times
Molecular phylogeny
Journal
PeerJ
ISSN: 2167-8359
Titre abrégé: PeerJ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101603425
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
16
10
2018
accepted:
20
12
2018
entrez:
1
2
2019
pubmed:
1
2
2019
medline:
1
2
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Previous phylogenetic conclusions on the family Betulaceae were based on either morphological characters or traditional single loci, which may indicate some limitations. The chloroplast genome contains rich polymorphism information, which is very suitable for phylogenetic studies. Thus, we sequenced the chloroplast genome sequences of three Betulaceae species and performed multiple analyses to investigate the genome variation, resolve the phylogenetic relationships, and clarify the divergence history. Chloroplast genomes were sequenced using the high-throughput sequencing. A comparative genomic analysis was conducted to examine the global genome variation and screen the hotspots. Three chloroplast partitions were used to reconstruct the phylogenetic relationships using Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian Inference approaches. Then, molecular dating and biogeographic inferences were conducted based on the whole chloroplast genome data. Betulaceae chloroplast genomes consisted of a small single-copy region and a large single copy region, and two copies of inverted repeat regions. Nine hotspots can be used as potential DNA barcodes for species delimitation. Phylogenies strongly supported the division of Betulaceae into two subfamilies: Coryloideae and Betuloideae. The phylogenetic position of This research elucidates the potential of chloroplast genome sequences in the application of developing molecular markers, studying evolutionary relationships and historical dynamic of Betulaceae.It also reveals the advantages of using chloroplast genome data to illuminate those phylogenies that have not been well solved yet by traditional approaches in other plants.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Previous phylogenetic conclusions on the family Betulaceae were based on either morphological characters or traditional single loci, which may indicate some limitations. The chloroplast genome contains rich polymorphism information, which is very suitable for phylogenetic studies. Thus, we sequenced the chloroplast genome sequences of three Betulaceae species and performed multiple analyses to investigate the genome variation, resolve the phylogenetic relationships, and clarify the divergence history.
METHODS
METHODS
Chloroplast genomes were sequenced using the high-throughput sequencing. A comparative genomic analysis was conducted to examine the global genome variation and screen the hotspots. Three chloroplast partitions were used to reconstruct the phylogenetic relationships using Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian Inference approaches. Then, molecular dating and biogeographic inferences were conducted based on the whole chloroplast genome data.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Betulaceae chloroplast genomes consisted of a small single-copy region and a large single copy region, and two copies of inverted repeat regions. Nine hotspots can be used as potential DNA barcodes for species delimitation. Phylogenies strongly supported the division of Betulaceae into two subfamilies: Coryloideae and Betuloideae. The phylogenetic position of
DISCUSSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This research elucidates the potential of chloroplast genome sequences in the application of developing molecular markers, studying evolutionary relationships and historical dynamic of Betulaceae.It also reveals the advantages of using chloroplast genome data to illuminate those phylogenies that have not been well solved yet by traditional approaches in other plants.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30701138
doi: 10.7717/peerj.6320
pii: 6320
pmc: PMC6348958
doi:
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.7199816.v1']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e6320Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare there are no competing interests.
Références
Am J Bot. 1999 Aug;86(8):1168-81
pubmed: 10449397
Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Mar 1;16(3):142-147
pubmed: 11179578
Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 Nov 15;29(22):4633-42
pubmed: 11713313
Mol Biol Evol. 1992 Nov;9(6):1076-88
pubmed: 1435235
Bioinformatics. 2004 Nov 22;20(17):3252-5
pubmed: 15180927
Syst Biol. 2004 Apr;53(2):216-43
pubmed: 15205050
Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Jul 1;33(Web Server issue):W686-9
pubmed: 15980563
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007 Nov;45(2):547-63
pubmed: 17644003
Syst Biol. 2007 Aug;56(4):564-77
pubmed: 17654362
Bioinformatics. 2008 Mar 15;24(6):861-2
pubmed: 18227121
Bioinformatics. 2009 Jun 1;25(11):1451-2
pubmed: 19346325
BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Dec 15;10:421
pubmed: 20003500
Syst Biol. 2010 May;59(3):307-21
pubmed: 20525638
PLoS One. 2010 Jun 25;5(6):e11147
pubmed: 20593022
Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Jan;28(1):583-600
pubmed: 20805190
PLoS Biol. 2011 Mar;9(3):e1000602
pubmed: 21423652
Mol Ecol Resour. 2008 Jan;8(1):92-4
pubmed: 21585724
Am J Bot. 2011 Apr;98(4):704-30
pubmed: 21613169
Am J Bot. 2005 Jan;92(1):142-66
pubmed: 21652394
Syst Biol. 2012 May;61(3):539-42
pubmed: 22357727
J Comput Biol. 2012 May;19(5):455-77
pubmed: 22506599
Bioinformatics. 2012 Jun 15;28(12):1647-9
pubmed: 22543367
Am J Bot. 2012 Jun;99(6):e240-4
pubmed: 22615305
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Apr;30(4):772-80
pubmed: 23329690
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 May;30(5):1188-95
pubmed: 23418397
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57607
pubmed: 23460883
Mol Ecol Resour. 2013 Sep;13(5):929-37
pubmed: 23718317
Mol Biol Evol. 2014 Mar;31(3):645-59
pubmed: 24336877
Nat Commun. 2014;5:3311
pubmed: 24548928
Mitochondrial DNA. 2014 Jun;25(3):209-11
pubmed: 24571405
Am J Bot. 2014 Apr;101(4):722-9
pubmed: 24699541
PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Apr 10;10(4):e1003537
pubmed: 24722319
BMC Evol Biol. 2014 Jul 07;14:151
pubmed: 25001059
Am J Bot. 2014 Nov;101(11):1987-2004
pubmed: 25366863
Mol Biol Evol. 2015 Jan;32(1):268-74
pubmed: 25371430
BMC Genet. 2014 Dec 20;15:138
pubmed: 25526752
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2015 Jun;87:46-9
pubmed: 25819445
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 23;10(6):e0129930
pubmed: 26103589
New Phytol. 2016 Jan;209(2):855-70
pubmed: 26350789
Nature. 2016 Feb 18;530(7590):331-5
pubmed: 26814964
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Mar 21;7:341
pubmed: 27047519
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Mar 23;7:355
pubmed: 27047524
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2016 Aug;101:111-121
pubmed: 27164472
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Jan 04;7:2022
pubmed: 28101098
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Jan 06;7:1955
pubmed: 28111577
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Jan 10;7:2054
pubmed: 28119727
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Jan 19;8:15
pubmed: 28154574
New Phytol. 2017 May;214(3):1355-1367
pubmed: 28186635
Nat Methods. 2017 Jun;14(6):587-589
pubmed: 28481363
Front Plant Sci. 2017 May 19;8:816
pubmed: 28579999
Genes (Basel). 2017 Sep 13;8(9):null
pubmed: 28902130
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Mar 01;19(3):null
pubmed: 29494509
Am J Bot. 2017 Oct;104(10):1493-1509
pubmed: 29885220
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Jul 09;9:927
pubmed: 30038632
J Mol Evol. 1988 Dec-1989 Feb;28(1-2):87-97
pubmed: 3148746
Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Jan 15;27(2):573-80
pubmed: 9862982