Describing vegetation characteristics used by two rare forest-dwelling species: Will established reserves provide for coastal marten in Oregon?


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 08 06 2018
accepted: 03 01 2019
entrez: 1 2 2019
pubmed: 1 2 2019
medline: 23 10 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Forest management guidelines for rare or declining species in the Pacific Northwest, USA, include both late successional reserves and specific vegetation management criteria. However, whether current management practices for well-studied species such as northern spotted owls (Strix occidentallis caurina) can aid in conserving a lesser known subspecies-Humboldt martens (Martes caurina humboldtensis)-is unclear. To address the lack of information for martens in coastal Oregon, USA, we quantified vegetation characteristics at locations used by Humboldt martens and spotted owls in two regions (central and southern coast) and at two spatial scales (the site level summarizing extensive vegetation surveys and regionally using remotely sensed vegetation and estimated habitat models). We estimated amount of predicted habitat for both species in established reserves. If predicted overlap in established reserves was low, then we reported vegetation characteristics to inform potential locations for reserves or management opportunities. In the Central Coast, very little overlap existed in vegetation characteristics between Humboldt martens and spotted owls at either the site or regional level. Humboldt martens occurred in young forests composed of small diameter trees with few snags or downed logs. Humboldt martens were also found in areas with very dense vegetation when overstory canopy and shrub cover percentages were combined. In the South Coast, Humboldt martens occurred in forests with smaller diameter trees than spotted owl sites on average. Coastal Humboldt martens may use stands of predicted high quality spotted owl habitat in the Pacific Northwest. Nonetheless, our observations suggest that coastal Humboldt martens exist in areas that include a much higher diversity of conifer size classes as long as extensive dense shrub cover, predominantly in the form of high salal and evergreen huckleberry, are available. We suggest that managers consider how structural characteristics (e.g., downed logs, shrub cover, patch size), are associated with long-term species persistence rather than relying on reserves based on broad cover types. Describing vegetation may partially describe suitability, but available prey or predation risk ultimately influence likelihood of individual Humboldt marten use. Guidelines for diversifying vegetation management, and retaining or restoring appropriate habitat conditions at both the stand level and regionally, may increase management flexibility and identify forest conditions that support both spotted owls and Humboldt martens.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30703124
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210865
pii: PONE-D-18-17276
pmc: PMC6354973
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0210865

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Mol Ecol. 1998 Sep;7(9):1248-51
pubmed: 9734080
J Mammal. 2016 Jun 9;97(3):663-688
pubmed: 29692469
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Aug;86(16):6196-200
pubmed: 2762322
Ecology. 2008 Aug;89(8):2273-80
pubmed: 18724737
ILAR J. 2016;56(3):335-41
pubmed: 26912719
Mol Ecol. 1999 Aug;8(8):1352-4
pubmed: 10507871
Anim Genet. 1998 Feb;29(1):63
pubmed: 9682453
Mol Ecol. 1998 Dec;7(12):1776-8
pubmed: 9859206
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Sep 26;114(39):10309-10311
pubmed: 28923970
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 23;10(4):e0123778
pubmed: 25905920
PeerJ. 2018 Apr 4;6:e4530
pubmed: 29637018
Mov Ecol. 2013 Jul 03;1(1):2
pubmed: 25709816
PLoS One. 2019 May 1;14(5):e0214653
pubmed: 31042737
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 24;9(2):e89807
pubmed: 24587050
J Wildl Dis. 2015 Jan;51(1):250-4
pubmed: 25380359
Mol Ecol. 2003 Jun;12(6):1389-402
pubmed: 12755869
Ecol Evol. 2016 Dec 14;7(1):115-124
pubmed: 28070280

Auteurs

Katie M Moriarty (KM)

USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Olympia, Washington, United States of America.

Jake Verschuyl (J)

National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Western Sustainable Forestry Program, Anacortes, Washington, United States of America.

Andrew J Kroll (AJ)

Weyerhaeuser, Springfield, Oregon, United States of America.

Raymond Davis (R)

USDA Forest Service, Region 6, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America.

Joshua Chapman (J)

USDA Forest Service, Region 6 Regional Office, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.

Bruce Hollen (B)

USDI Bureau of Land Management, Regional Office, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH