Tumor-size responses to first-line is a predictor of overall survival in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Colonic neoplasms
Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors
Survival rate
Tumor burden
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Jul 2019
Historique:
received:
10
09
2018
accepted:
12
12
2018
revised:
03
12
2018
pubmed:
2
2
2019
medline:
7
9
2019
entrez:
2
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Early tumor shrinkage (ETS) has been reported to be associated with survival of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Our aim was to analyze long-term tumor-size evolution, according to early mCRC best responses during the first-line therapy, to evaluate first best response-survival links. Sixty-five patients with unresectable mCRCs, treated between 2010 and 2015, were included retrospectively in this descriptive monocenter study and grouped according to their RECIST 1.1 first-line best responses: progressive disease (PD Tumor loads of ETS Tumors responding to first-line chemotherapy also responded better to subsequent lines, whereas PD • Early shrinking tumors under first-line chemotherapy responded better to subsequent lines, maintaining low tumor loads, potentially explaining the link between early tumor shrinkage and overall survival of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. • mCRCs progressing under first-line chemotherapy remained refractory to other therapies and their tumor loads increased rapidly. • Even outside a clinical trial, an early first CT scan reevaluation with RECIST criteria 8 weeks after starting first-line therapy is crucial to determine long-term mCRC evolution.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30706121
doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5967-0
pii: 10.1007/s00330-018-5967-0
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3871-3880Références
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 1;33(1):4-6
pubmed: 25366687
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Aug;32(8):1179-1190
pubmed: 28424871
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jun 10;31(17):2110-4
pubmed: 23650411
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Oct 20;31(30):3764-75
pubmed: 24043732
Eur J Cancer. 2015 May;51(7):800-7
pubmed: 25794604
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Feb 2;92(3):205-16
pubmed: 10655437
JAMA. 2017 Jun 20;317(23):2392-2401
pubmed: 28632865
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Oct;17(10):1426-1434
pubmed: 27575024
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Sep;15(10):1065-75
pubmed: 25088940
Ann Oncol. 2009 Aug;20(8):1375-82
pubmed: 19465422
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Sep;51(14):1927-36
pubmed: 26188850
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Jul;51(10):1231-42
pubmed: 25956209
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Oct;16(13):1306-15
pubmed: 26338525
Acta Oncol. 2013 Jun;52(5):956-62
pubmed: 23244709
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Sep 15;23(18):5416-5425
pubmed: 28576867
Ann Oncol. 2012 Apr;23(4):948-54
pubmed: 21832285
Ann Oncol. 2015 Aug;26(8):1715-22
pubmed: 25851626
Cancer Sci. 2013 Jun;104(6):718-24
pubmed: 23480146
Target Oncol. 2016 Dec;11(6):799-806
pubmed: 27306648
Ann Oncol. 2015 Jun;26(6):1188-1194
pubmed: 25712456
Ann Oncol. 2016 Aug;27(8):1386-422
pubmed: 27380959
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jul 20;32(21):2240-7
pubmed: 24687833