Translational Framework Predicting Tumour Response in Gemcitabine-Treated Patients with Advanced Pancreatic and Ovarian Cancer from Xenograft Studies.


Journal

The AAPS journal
ISSN: 1550-7416
Titre abrégé: AAPS J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101223209

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
31 01 2019
Historique:
received: 14 09 2018
accepted: 17 12 2018
entrez: 2 2 2019
pubmed: 2 2 2019
medline: 15 2 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The aim of this evaluation was to predict tumour response to gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreas or ovarian cancer using pre-clinical data obtained from xenograft tumour-bearing mice. The approach consisted of building a translational model combining pre-clinical pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) models and parameters, with dosing paradigms used in the clinics along with clinical PK models to derive tumour profiles in humans driving overall survival. Tumour growth inhibition simulations were performed using drug effect parameters obtained from mice, system parameters obtained from mice after appropriate scaling, patient PK models for gemcitabine and carboplatin, and the standard dosing schedules given in the clinical scenario for both types of cancers. Tumour profiles in mice were scaled by body weight to their equivalent values in humans. As models for survival in humans showed that tumour size was the main driver of the hazard rate, it was possible to describe overall survival in pancreatic and ovarian cancer patients. Simulated tumour dynamics in pancreatic and ovarian cancer patients were evaluated using available data from clinical trials. Furthermore, calculated metrics showed values (maximal tumour regression [0-17%] and tumour size ratio at week 12 with respect to baseline [- 9, - 4.5]) in the range of those predicted with the clinical PKPD models. The model-informed Drug Discovery and Development paradigm has been successfully applied retrospectively to gemcitabine data, through a semi-mechanistic translational approach, describing the time course of the tumour response in patients from pre-clinical studies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30706160
doi: 10.1208/s12248-018-0291-9
pii: 10.1208/s12248-018-0291-9
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic 0
Deoxycytidine 0W860991D6
Gemcitabine 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

23

Références

CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2018 Sep;7(9):549-561
pubmed: 30084546
J Pharm Sci. 2015 Jan;104(1):191-206
pubmed: 25393841
Eur J Pharmacol. 2014 Oct 15;741:8-16
pubmed: 25084222
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2016 Dec;43(6):549-565
pubmed: 27771815
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018 Mar 30;115:296-303
pubmed: 29366960
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1989;24(3):148-54
pubmed: 2544306
Invest New Drugs. 2003 May;21(2):225-41
pubmed: 12889741
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004 Aug;3(8):711-5
pubmed: 15286737
Br J Cancer. 2001 May 18;84(10):1424-31
pubmed: 11355958
AAPS J. 2008 Dec;10(4):552-9
pubmed: 19003542
Eur J Cancer. 2007 Aug;43(12):1862-8
pubmed: 17604156
Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2007 Feb;2(2):185-209
pubmed: 23496077
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2017 Mar;360(3):445-456
pubmed: 28028124
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2006 Jun;33(3):369-93
pubmed: 16770528
Drug Resist Updat. 2015 Nov;23:55-68
pubmed: 26690340
Semin Oncol. 1997 Apr;24(2 Suppl 7):S7-2-S7-7
pubmed: 9194473
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Jun;83(6):909-12
pubmed: 18388873
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1997 Jan 15;54(2):162-70; quiz 197-8
pubmed: 9117804
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2008 Apr;29(4):186-91
pubmed: 18353445
Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Nov 1;13(21):6410-8
pubmed: 17975154
Front Physiol. 2011 Feb 24;2:4
pubmed: 21483730
Cancer Res. 1999 Oct 1;59(19):4770-5
pubmed: 10519381
Biochem Pharmacol. 2014 Jan 1;87(1):150-61
pubmed: 23817077
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Sep;82(3):717-27
pubmed: 27136318
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2017 Jan;6(1):11-20
pubmed: 27863176
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Jul 15;18(14):3846-55
pubmed: 22648270
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2018 Jul;366(1):96-104
pubmed: 29691287
Cancer Biol Ther. 2003 Jul-Aug;2(4 Suppl 1):S134-9
pubmed: 14508091
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017 Mar;79(3):545-558
pubmed: 28243682
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Feb 15;23(4):1080-1090
pubmed: 27551002
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2015 Nov;4(11):660-8
pubmed: 26783502

Auteurs

Maria Garcia-Cremades (M)

Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology, School of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Navarra, 31080, Pamplona, Spain.
Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdisNA), University of Navarra, 31080, Pamplona, Spain.
Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA.

Celine Pitou (C)

Global PK/PD & Pharmacometrics, Eli Lilly and Company, Windlesham, Surrey, UK.

Philip W Iversen (PW)

Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Iñaki F Troconiz (IF)

Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology, School of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Navarra, 31080, Pamplona, Spain. itroconiz@unav.es.
Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdisNA), University of Navarra, 31080, Pamplona, Spain. itroconiz@unav.es.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH