Spinal macrophage migration inhibitory factor and high mobility group box 1 mediate persistent bladder pain.
Animals
Antibodies, Monoclonal
/ pharmacology
Female
Glycyrrhizic Acid
/ pharmacology
HMGB1 Protein
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Hyperalgesia
/ chemically induced
Macrophage Migration-Inhibitory Factors
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Mice
Neuralgia
/ chemically induced
Oligopeptides
Pain Measurement
/ drug effects
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos
/ metabolism
Receptors, Thrombin
/ agonists
Spinal Cord
/ metabolism
Urinary Bladder
/ drug effects
HMGB1
Intrathecal
MIF
PAR4
Persistent bladder pain
Journal
Neuroscience letters
ISSN: 1872-7972
Titre abrégé: Neurosci Lett
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 7600130
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 04 2019
23 04 2019
Historique:
received:
14
12
2018
revised:
17
01
2019
accepted:
27
01
2019
pubmed:
2
2
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
2
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Repeated intravesical PAR4 (protease activated receptor 4) activation elicits persistent bladder pain lasting 5 days after the last treatment. Persistent bladder pain was fully reversed by a systemic HMGB1 (high mobility group box 1) inhibitor while a MIF (macrophage migration inhibitory factor) antagonist partly reversed it. Since there is growing evidence that spinal MIF and HMGB1 mediate inflammatory and neuropathic pain we examined whether there were spinal changes occurring during persistent bladder pain that may be responsible for maintaining bladder pain. In addition, we tested whether we could modulate persistent bladder pain with spinal MIF or HMGB1 antagonists. Persistent bladder pain was elicited in female C57 mice by repeated (3x) intravesical instillation of PAR4-activating peptide while control animals received scramble peptide treatment. On day 4, spinal cord (L6-S1) changes in c-fos (non-specific marker of spinal activation) was assessed with immunofluorescence while MIF and HMGB1 were assessed with immunofluorescence, western blotting and real-time PCR. On day 7, mice received an intrathecal injection of a neutralizing MIF monoclonal antibody (15 μg in 5 μl PBS) or a HMGB1 inhibitor glycyrrhizin (25 μg in 5 μl of 5% alcohol in PBS) and abdominal mechanical threshold was tested. On day 9, mice were treated with vehicle or control and abdominal mechanical threshold was tested. Immunofluorescence showed that c-fos and MIF in the dorsal horn, dorsal grey commissure and intermediolateral areas significantly increased in PAR4-treated mice while HMGB1 was decreased. In addition, intrathecal treatment with MIF neutralizing mAb or glycyrrhizin significantly alleviated abdominal mechanical hypersensitivity at 1 and 2 h and the analgesic effect diminished at 6 h. Vehicle or control treatment had no effect. Persistent bladder pain is associated with spinal changes in MIF and HMGB1 levels. Furthermore, spinal treatment with MIF monoclonal antibody and HMGB1 inhibitor temporarily reversed bladder pain. Our findings suggest that spinal MIF and HMGB1 participate in persistent bladder pain induced by repeated intravesical PAR4 and may be potential therapeutic targets in chronic bladder pain conditions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30708129
pii: S0304-3940(19)30064-3
doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2019.01.046
pmc: PMC6443422
mid: NIHMS1520662
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal
0
HMGB1 Protein
0
Macrophage Migration-Inhibitory Factors
0
Oligopeptides
0
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos
0
Receptors, Thrombin
0
alanyl-tyrosyl-prolyl-glycyl-lysyl-phenylalanine
0
Glycyrrhizic Acid
6FO62043WK
protease-activated receptor 4
JWE1M73YZN
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
54-58Subventions
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 AR049610
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : R01 DK093496
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001863
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Références
Urol Int. 2017;98(2):228-235
pubmed: 28161708
J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2004 Jan;24(1):55-63
pubmed: 14980085
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 24;11(3):e0152055
pubmed: 27010488
Pain Physician. 2015 Jul-Aug;18(4):E615-28
pubmed: 26218952
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2000 Apr;278(4):R1027-39
pubmed: 10749792
Pain. 2010 Feb;148(2):275-83
pubmed: 20005040
Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2015;131:251-79
pubmed: 25744676
Pain. 2014 Feb;155(2):322-33
pubmed: 24145208
Am J Physiol. 1993 Aug;265(2 Pt 2):R326-33
pubmed: 8368386
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014;2014:639563
pubmed: 25120576
Pain. 2011 Dec;152(12):2881-91
pubmed: 22019135
J Neurosci. 1992 Dec;12(12):4878-89
pubmed: 1464772
J Comp Neurol. 1981 Sep 20;201(3):415-40
pubmed: 7276258
Mol Endocrinol. 2007 Jun;21(6):1267-80
pubmed: 17389748
Int J Urol. 2018 Oct;25(10):887-893
pubmed: 30112848
PLoS One. 2015 May 28;10(5):e0127628
pubmed: 26020638
Eur J Pain. 2015 Feb;19(2):176-86
pubmed: 24842692
Brain Res. 2018 May 15;1687:1-10
pubmed: 29476751
Anesthesiology. 2011 Mar;114(3):643-59
pubmed: 21293254
Physiol Rep. 2017 Dec;5(24):
pubmed: 29263120
Pain. 2014 Sep;155(9):1802-13
pubmed: 24954167
J Immunol. 2011 Jan 1;186(1):527-38
pubmed: 21106847
Cancer Lett. 2016 Jun 1;375(2):245-255
pubmed: 26952810
Exp Neurol. 2012 Aug;236(2):351-62
pubmed: 22575600