Proliferative potential and resistance to immune checkpoint blockade in lung cancer patients.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
/ therapeutic use
B7-H1 Antigen
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Base Sequence
Biomarkers
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
/ drug therapy
Cell Proliferation
/ genetics
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
Female
Humans
Lung Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Survival Analysis
Atezolizumab
Ipilimumab
Nivolumab
PD-1
Pembrolizumab
Journal
Journal for immunotherapy of cancer
ISSN: 2051-1426
Titre abrégé: J Immunother Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101620585
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 02 2019
01 02 2019
Historique:
received:
14
11
2018
accepted:
13
01
2019
entrez:
3
2
2019
pubmed:
3
2
2019
medline:
1
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been linked to local immunosuppression independent of major ICI targets (e.g., PD-1). Clinical experience with response prediction based on PD-L1 expression suggests that other factors influence sensitivity to ICIs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Tumor specimens from 120 NSCLC patients from 10 institutions were evaluated for PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry, and global proliferative profile by targeted RNA-seq. Cell proliferation, derived from the mean expression of 10 proliferation-associated genes (namely BUB1, CCNB2, CDK1, CDKN3, FOXM1, KIAA0101, MAD2L1, MELK, MKI67, and TOP2A), was identified as a marker of response to ICIs in NSCLC. Poorly, moderately, and highly proliferative tumors were somewhat equally represented in NSCLC, with tumors with the highest PD-L1 expression being more frequently moderately proliferative as compared to lesser levels of PD-L1 expression. Proliferation status had an impact on survival in patients with both PD-L1 positive and negative tumors. There was a significant survival advantage for moderately proliferative tumors compared to their combined highly/poorly counterparts (p = 0.021). Moderately proliferative PD-L1 positive tumors had a median survival of 14.6 months that was almost twice that of PD-L1 negative highly/poorly proliferative at 7.6 months (p = 0.028). Median survival in moderately proliferative PD-L1 negative tumors at 12.6 months was comparable to that of highly/poorly proliferative PD-L1 positive tumors at 11.5 months, but in both instances less than that of moderately proliferative PD-L1 positive tumors. Similar to survival, proliferation status has impact on disease control (DC) in patients with both PD-L1 positive and negative tumors. Patients with moderately versus those with poorly or highly proliferative tumors have a superior DC rate when combined with any classification schema used to score PD-L1 as a positive result (i.e., TPS ≥ 50% or ≥ 1%), and best displayed by a DC rate for moderately proliferative tumors of no less than 40% for any classification of PD-L1 as a negative result. While there is an over representation of moderately proliferative tumors as PD-L1 expression increases this does not account for the improved survival or higher disease control rates seen in PD-L1 negative tumors. Cell proliferation is potentially a new biomarker of response to ICIs in NSCLC and is applicable to PD-L1 negative tumors.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been linked to local immunosuppression independent of major ICI targets (e.g., PD-1). Clinical experience with response prediction based on PD-L1 expression suggests that other factors influence sensitivity to ICIs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.
METHODS
Tumor specimens from 120 NSCLC patients from 10 institutions were evaluated for PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry, and global proliferative profile by targeted RNA-seq.
RESULTS
Cell proliferation, derived from the mean expression of 10 proliferation-associated genes (namely BUB1, CCNB2, CDK1, CDKN3, FOXM1, KIAA0101, MAD2L1, MELK, MKI67, and TOP2A), was identified as a marker of response to ICIs in NSCLC. Poorly, moderately, and highly proliferative tumors were somewhat equally represented in NSCLC, with tumors with the highest PD-L1 expression being more frequently moderately proliferative as compared to lesser levels of PD-L1 expression. Proliferation status had an impact on survival in patients with both PD-L1 positive and negative tumors. There was a significant survival advantage for moderately proliferative tumors compared to their combined highly/poorly counterparts (p = 0.021). Moderately proliferative PD-L1 positive tumors had a median survival of 14.6 months that was almost twice that of PD-L1 negative highly/poorly proliferative at 7.6 months (p = 0.028). Median survival in moderately proliferative PD-L1 negative tumors at 12.6 months was comparable to that of highly/poorly proliferative PD-L1 positive tumors at 11.5 months, but in both instances less than that of moderately proliferative PD-L1 positive tumors. Similar to survival, proliferation status has impact on disease control (DC) in patients with both PD-L1 positive and negative tumors. Patients with moderately versus those with poorly or highly proliferative tumors have a superior DC rate when combined with any classification schema used to score PD-L1 as a positive result (i.e., TPS ≥ 50% or ≥ 1%), and best displayed by a DC rate for moderately proliferative tumors of no less than 40% for any classification of PD-L1 as a negative result. While there is an over representation of moderately proliferative tumors as PD-L1 expression increases this does not account for the improved survival or higher disease control rates seen in PD-L1 negative tumors.
CONCLUSIONS
Cell proliferation is potentially a new biomarker of response to ICIs in NSCLC and is applicable to PD-L1 negative tumors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30709424
doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0506-3
pii: 10.1186/s40425-019-0506-3
pmc: PMC6359802
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
B7-H1 Antigen
0
Biomarkers
0
CD274 protein, human
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
27Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA014236
Pays : United States
Références
Lung Cancer. 2013 Jan;79(1):1-7
pubmed: 23137549
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2015 Aug;8(Spec Issue):9
pubmed: 26380599
Oncotarget. 2017 Jun 13;8(24):38668-38681
pubmed: 28454104
Oncoimmunology. 2017 Aug 31;6(11):e1373237
pubmed: 29147629
Oncotarget. 2017 Jan 10;8(2):3197-3205
pubmed: 27911273
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2016 Oct;5(5):543-546
pubmed: 27827466
Anticancer Res. 2018 Jul;38(7):3863-3870
pubmed: 29970506
Lancet. 2016 Apr 30;387(10030):1837-46
pubmed: 26970723
J Mol Diagn. 2018 Jan;20(1):95-109
pubmed: 29061374
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015 Oct 01;8(10):13083-9
pubmed: 26722504
Sci Transl Med. 2018 Sep 19;10(459):
pubmed: 30232229
N Engl J Med. 2015 May 21;372(21):2018-28
pubmed: 25891174
Nat Commun. 2018 Aug 10;9(1):3196
pubmed: 30097571
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 9;377(19):1836-1846
pubmed: 29117498
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov;14(11):655-668
pubmed: 28653677
N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 22;373(17):1627-39
pubmed: 26412456
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;35(34):3867-3876
pubmed: 29053400
Immunity. 2018 Apr 17;48(4):812-830.e14
pubmed: 29628290
J Immunother Cancer. 2018 May 9;6(1):32
pubmed: 29743104
Oncologist. 2016 May;21(5):643-50
pubmed: 27026676