Gadolinium retention in gliomas and adjacent normal brain tissue: association with tumor contrast enhancement and linear/macrocyclic agents.


Journal

Neuroradiology
ISSN: 1432-1920
Titre abrégé: Neuroradiology
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 1302751

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2019
Historique:
received: 22 10 2018
accepted: 16 01 2019
pubmed: 3 2 2019
medline: 30 4 2019
entrez: 3 2 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To quantitate gadolinium deposits in gliomas and adjacent normal brain specimens, and to evaluate their association with tumor contrast enhancement and the type of gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) used. A total of 69 patients with primary glioma who underwent contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prior to surgery were included in this retrospective study. Gadolinium was measured from histologically viable tumor, normal brain, and necrosis within the sample, when available, using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Tumor contrast enhancement was categorized as none, minimal, or noticeable. Differences in gadolinium deposits by contrast enhancement and GBCA type were assessed. Seven patients received linear GBCA and 62 macrocyclic, respectively. At the time of surgery, gadolinium deposits were detected in 39 out of 69 (57%) tumor samples, 8 out of 13 (62%) normal brain, and 12 out of 14 (86%) necrotic specimens. Gadolinium was detected in both enhancing and non-enhancing tumors, but was greatest in gliomas with noticeable enhancement (p = 0.02). Administration of linear agents gadodiamide and gadopentetate dimeglumine resulted in significantly higher tumor gadolinium relative to macrocyclic gadoterate meglumine (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). Normal brain and necrosis also showed higher gadolinium after exposure to linear gadodiamide (both p < 0.05). In multivariate regression, GBCA type (linear/macrocyclic) was the most powerful predictor of tumor gadolinium retention (p < 0.001). Gadolinium can be detected in both enhancing and non-enhancing gliomas, neighboring normal brain, and necrosis. Gadolinium retention is higher after exposure to linear GBCAs compared with the macrocyclic gadoterate meglumine.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30710184
doi: 10.1007/s00234-019-02172-6
pii: 10.1007/s00234-019-02172-6
doi:

Substances chimiques

Contrast Media 0
Organometallic Compounds 0
Meglumine 6HG8UB2MUY
gadodiamide 84F6U3J2R6
Gadolinium DTPA K2I13DR72L
gadoterate meglumine L0ND3981AG

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

535-544

Références

Radiology. 2014 Mar;270(3):834-41
pubmed: 24475844
Invest Radiol. 2015 Aug;50(8):473-80
pubmed: 26107651
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Apr;21(4):1104-8
pubmed: 16431890
Invest Radiol. 2008 Dec;43(12):817-28
pubmed: 19002053
Radiology. 2015 Jun;275(3):783-91
pubmed: 25848905
Radiology. 2015 Jul;276(1):228-32
pubmed: 25942417
Br J Radiol. 2017 Nov;90(1079):20170115
pubmed: 28749164
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Oct;36(10):1859-65
pubmed: 26294649
Invest Radiol. 2014 Oct;49(10):685-90
pubmed: 24872007
J Clin Invest. 2013 Mar;123(3):1299-309
pubmed: 23434588
Radiology. 2018 Sep;288(3):703-709
pubmed: 29737953
Radiology. 2017 Mar;282(3):699-707
pubmed: 27925871
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Dec;30(6):1249-58
pubmed: 19938037
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2007 Mar;26(3):221-9
pubmed: 17439925
Invest Radiol. 2017 Apr;52(4):195-197
pubmed: 27755154
Radiology. 2018 Aug;288(2):416-423
pubmed: 29737947
Invest Radiol. 1995 Jun;30(6):372-80
pubmed: 7490190
Br J Radiol. 2006 Aug;79(944):652-8
pubmed: 16641420
Invest Radiol. 2017 Jun;52(6):324-333
pubmed: 28323657
Invest Radiol. 2016 Jul;51(7):447-53
pubmed: 26863577
Acta Neuropathol. 2018 Jul;136(1):127-138
pubmed: 29748901
Radiology. 2017 Nov;285(2):546-554
pubmed: 28653860
Radiology. 2015 Jun;275(3):803-9
pubmed: 25633504
Radiology. 2015 Jun;275(3):772-82
pubmed: 25742194
Invest Radiol. 2015 Nov;50(11):743-8
pubmed: 26352749
Acta Radiol. 2010 Dec;51(10):1126-36
pubmed: 20868305
Australas Radiol. 2004 Sep;48(3):324-32
pubmed: 15344981
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Oct;32(4):803-8
pubmed: 20882610
Invest Radiol. 2018 Jan;53(1):20-25
pubmed: 28742734

Auteurs

Aida Kiviniemi (A)

Department of Radiology, Division of Medical Imaging, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, FI-20521, Turku, Finland. aida.kiviniemi@utu.fi.

Maria Gardberg (M)

Department of Pathology, University of Turku, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.

Paul Ek (P)

Johan Gadolin Process Chemistry Centre, Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland.

Janek Frantzén (J)

Department of Neurosurgery and Division of Clinical Neurosciences, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.

Johan Bobacka (J)

Johan Gadolin Process Chemistry Centre, Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland.

Heikki Minn (H)

Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH