Gadolinium retention in gliomas and adjacent normal brain tissue: association with tumor contrast enhancement and linear/macrocyclic agents.
Brain
/ diagnostic imaging
Brain Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Contrast Media
/ pharmacokinetics
Female
Gadolinium DTPA
/ pharmacokinetics
Glioma
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
/ methods
Male
Meglumine
/ pharmacokinetics
Middle Aged
Organometallic Compounds
/ pharmacokinetics
Retrospective Studies
Contrast agent
Gadolinium retention
Glioma
Linear
Macrocyclic
Journal
Neuroradiology
ISSN: 1432-1920
Titre abrégé: Neuroradiology
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 1302751
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2019
May 2019
Historique:
received:
22
10
2018
accepted:
16
01
2019
pubmed:
3
2
2019
medline:
30
4
2019
entrez:
3
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To quantitate gadolinium deposits in gliomas and adjacent normal brain specimens, and to evaluate their association with tumor contrast enhancement and the type of gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) used. A total of 69 patients with primary glioma who underwent contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prior to surgery were included in this retrospective study. Gadolinium was measured from histologically viable tumor, normal brain, and necrosis within the sample, when available, using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Tumor contrast enhancement was categorized as none, minimal, or noticeable. Differences in gadolinium deposits by contrast enhancement and GBCA type were assessed. Seven patients received linear GBCA and 62 macrocyclic, respectively. At the time of surgery, gadolinium deposits were detected in 39 out of 69 (57%) tumor samples, 8 out of 13 (62%) normal brain, and 12 out of 14 (86%) necrotic specimens. Gadolinium was detected in both enhancing and non-enhancing tumors, but was greatest in gliomas with noticeable enhancement (p = 0.02). Administration of linear agents gadodiamide and gadopentetate dimeglumine resulted in significantly higher tumor gadolinium relative to macrocyclic gadoterate meglumine (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). Normal brain and necrosis also showed higher gadolinium after exposure to linear gadodiamide (both p < 0.05). In multivariate regression, GBCA type (linear/macrocyclic) was the most powerful predictor of tumor gadolinium retention (p < 0.001). Gadolinium can be detected in both enhancing and non-enhancing gliomas, neighboring normal brain, and necrosis. Gadolinium retention is higher after exposure to linear GBCAs compared with the macrocyclic gadoterate meglumine.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30710184
doi: 10.1007/s00234-019-02172-6
pii: 10.1007/s00234-019-02172-6
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contrast Media
0
Organometallic Compounds
0
Meglumine
6HG8UB2MUY
gadodiamide
84F6U3J2R6
Gadolinium DTPA
K2I13DR72L
gadoterate meglumine
L0ND3981AG
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
535-544Références
Radiology. 2014 Mar;270(3):834-41
pubmed: 24475844
Invest Radiol. 2015 Aug;50(8):473-80
pubmed: 26107651
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Apr;21(4):1104-8
pubmed: 16431890
Invest Radiol. 2008 Dec;43(12):817-28
pubmed: 19002053
Radiology. 2015 Jun;275(3):783-91
pubmed: 25848905
Radiology. 2015 Jul;276(1):228-32
pubmed: 25942417
Br J Radiol. 2017 Nov;90(1079):20170115
pubmed: 28749164
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Oct;36(10):1859-65
pubmed: 26294649
Invest Radiol. 2014 Oct;49(10):685-90
pubmed: 24872007
J Clin Invest. 2013 Mar;123(3):1299-309
pubmed: 23434588
Radiology. 2018 Sep;288(3):703-709
pubmed: 29737953
Radiology. 2017 Mar;282(3):699-707
pubmed: 27925871
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Dec;30(6):1249-58
pubmed: 19938037
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2007 Mar;26(3):221-9
pubmed: 17439925
Invest Radiol. 2017 Apr;52(4):195-197
pubmed: 27755154
Radiology. 2018 Aug;288(2):416-423
pubmed: 29737947
Invest Radiol. 1995 Jun;30(6):372-80
pubmed: 7490190
Br J Radiol. 2006 Aug;79(944):652-8
pubmed: 16641420
Invest Radiol. 2017 Jun;52(6):324-333
pubmed: 28323657
Invest Radiol. 2016 Jul;51(7):447-53
pubmed: 26863577
Acta Neuropathol. 2018 Jul;136(1):127-138
pubmed: 29748901
Radiology. 2017 Nov;285(2):546-554
pubmed: 28653860
Radiology. 2015 Jun;275(3):803-9
pubmed: 25633504
Radiology. 2015 Jun;275(3):772-82
pubmed: 25742194
Invest Radiol. 2015 Nov;50(11):743-8
pubmed: 26352749
Acta Radiol. 2010 Dec;51(10):1126-36
pubmed: 20868305
Australas Radiol. 2004 Sep;48(3):324-32
pubmed: 15344981
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Oct;32(4):803-8
pubmed: 20882610
Invest Radiol. 2018 Jan;53(1):20-25
pubmed: 28742734