An integrated investigation of oocyte developmental competence: expression of key genes in human cumulus cells, morphokinetics of early divisions, blastulation, and euploidy.
Adult
Aneuploidy
Biomarkers
/ analysis
Blastocyst
/ physiology
Calcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Type 1
/ genetics
Cumulus Cells
/ cytology
Cyclooxygenase 2
/ genetics
Embryonic Development
Ephrin-B2
/ genetics
Female
Glycoproteins
/ genetics
Humans
Hyaluronan Synthases
/ genetics
Oocytes
/ cytology
Oogenesis
Pregnancy
Zygote
Blastocysts
CAMK1D
Cumulus cells
Noninvasive embryo selection
Oocyte competence
Journal
Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics
ISSN: 1573-7330
Titre abrégé: J Assist Reprod Genet
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9206495
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2019
May 2019
Historique:
received:
14
09
2018
accepted:
18
01
2019
pubmed:
3
2
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
3
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate the association of cumulus cell (CC)-related expression of a selected cluster of key genes (PTGS2, CAMK1D, HAS2, STC1, and EFNB2) with embryo development to blastocyst. Exploratory study at a private clinic. Eighteen advanced maternal age patients were enrolled (37.3 ± 4.0 years). Seventy-five cumuli were collected, whose oocytes resulted in either developmental arrest (N = 33) or blastocyst formation (N = 42). The noninvasive CC gene expression was combined with time-lapse morphokinetic parameters and, for blastocysts, with qPCR-based aneuploidy testing on trophectoderm biopsies. The detection rate was 100% for all transcripts, but STC1 (96%) and CAMK1D (89%). Among amplified assays, CC mean expression levels of CAMK1D, PTGS2, and HAS2 were higher from oocytes that developed to blastocyst. No difference in CC key gene expression was reported between euploid (N = 21) and aneuploid (N = 21) blastocysts. Some timings of early embryo development were faster in embryos developing to blastocyst (time of pronuclei appearance and fading, division to two- and four-cells, first and second cell cycles). However, the generalized linear models outlined increasing CAMK1D expression levels as the strongest parameter associated with oocytes' developmental potential from both a general (AUC = 0.78 among amplified samples) and an intrapatient perspectives (AUC = 0.9 among patients obtaining ≥ 2 zygotes from the cohort with different developmental outcomes). CAMK1D level of expression in CCs associated with blastocyst development. If confirmed from larger studies in wider populations of patients, the investigation of CC key gene expression might suit IVF clinics not adopting blastocyst culture. Future investigations should clarify the role of CAMK1D in ovarian physiology and could provide novel insights on how oocytes gain competence during folliculogenesis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30710230
doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01410-3
pii: 10.1007/s10815-019-01410-3
pmc: PMC6541693
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
EFNB2 protein, human
0
Ephrin-B2
0
Glycoproteins
0
teleocalcin
76687-96-2
Cyclooxygenase 2
EC 1.14.99.1
PTGS2 protein, human
EC 1.14.99.1
HAS2 protein, human
EC 2.4.1.212
Hyaluronan Synthases
EC 2.4.1.212
CAMK1D protein, human
EC 2.7.11.17
Calcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Type 1
EC 2.7.11.17
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
875-887Références
Endocrinology. 1999 Jun;140(6):2685-95
pubmed: 10342859
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Aug 31;96(18):10501-6
pubmed: 10468638
Endocrinology. 2000 Sep;141(9):3412-21
pubmed: 10965914
Nat Rev Genet. 2001 Apr;2(4):280-91
pubmed: 11283700
Reproduction. 2001 Dec;122(6):829-38
pubmed: 11732978
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2000;3(4):229-237
pubmed: 11844384
Genome Biol. 2002 Jun 18;3(7):RESEARCH0034
pubmed: 12184808
Mol Endocrinol. 2004 Aug;18(8):2085-96
pubmed: 15131261
Hum Reprod. 2004 Dec;19(12):2869-74
pubmed: 15471935
N Engl J Med. 2004 Nov 4;351(19):1927-9
pubmed: 15525717
J Biol Chem. 2006 Dec 1;281(48):37117-29
pubmed: 17023426
Hum Reprod. 2007 Jul;22(7):1973-81
pubmed: 17496054
Hum Reprod. 2007 Dec;22(12):3069-77
pubmed: 17951581
Reproduction. 2007 Nov;134(5):645-50
pubmed: 17965254
Mol Hum Reprod. 2008 Aug;14(8):445-53
pubmed: 18511487
Nat Protoc. 2008;3(6):1101-8
pubmed: 18546601
Semin Reprod Med. 2009 Jan;27(1):14-23
pubmed: 19197801
Mol Oncol. 2008 Dec;2(4):327-39
pubmed: 19383354
Hum Reprod. 2009 Sep;24(9):2104-13
pubmed: 19493872
Reproduction. 2009 Oct;138(4):629-37
pubmed: 19602522
Amino Acids. 2010 Feb;38(2):491-500
pubmed: 19997760
Hum Reprod. 2010 May;25(5):1199-205
pubmed: 20185513
Hum Reprod. 2010 May;25(5):1259-70
pubmed: 20228394
Fertil Steril. 2011 Feb;95(2):520-4
pubmed: 20537630
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011 Jan;28(1):31-40
pubmed: 20859762
Reprod Domest Anim. 2011 Apr;46(2):354-61
pubmed: 21198974
J Biol Chem. 1990 Nov 15;265(32):19517-23
pubmed: 2123188
Hum Reprod. 2011 May;26(5):1035-51
pubmed: 21372047
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Aug;96(8):E1246-54
pubmed: 21632818
Hum Reprod. 2011 Oct;26(10):2658-71
pubmed: 21828117
Fertil Steril. 2012 Apr;97(4):819-24
pubmed: 22342859
Hum Reprod. 2012 Aug;27(8):2559-68
pubmed: 22617123
Fertil Steril. 2012 Aug;98(2):432-9.e1-4
pubmed: 22633264
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012 Dec;1822(12):1896-912
pubmed: 22634430
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40449
pubmed: 22848380
Reprod Biomed Online. 2013 May;26(5):477-85
pubmed: 23518033
Fertil Steril. 2013 Aug;100(2):412-9.e5
pubmed: 23721712
Fertil Steril. 2013 Sep;100(3):624-30
pubmed: 23773313
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 20;8(6):e64946
pubmed: 23840313
Hum Reprod. 2013 Oct;28(10):2643-51
pubmed: 23900207
Hum Reprod Update. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):1-11
pubmed: 24082041
Fertil Steril. 2014 Mar;101(3):656-663.e1
pubmed: 24355045
Fertil Steril. 2014 Mar;101(3):699-704
pubmed: 24424365
Hum Reprod. 2014 May;29(5):997-1010
pubmed: 24510971
Hum Reprod. 2014 Jun;29(6):1173-81
pubmed: 24578475
Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 15;30(16):2310-6
pubmed: 24764462
J Biol Chem. 1989 Aug 15;264(23):13840-7
pubmed: 2503506
Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 Jul;23(7):901-6
pubmed: 25351780
Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Jan;30(1):57-66
pubmed: 25458852
Hum Reprod. 2015 Feb;30(2):276-83
pubmed: 25527613
Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Apr;30(4):426-33
pubmed: 25682305
Science. 2015 Apr 10;348(6231):235-8
pubmed: 25859044
Hum Reprod. 2015 Aug;30(8):1850-60
pubmed: 26040474
Hum Reprod. 2015 Sep;30(9):2097-106
pubmed: 26150408
Fertil Steril. 2015 Dec;104(6):1503-12
pubmed: 26385405
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 15;10(10):e0140779
pubmed: 26470028
J Biol Chem. 2015 Dec 11;290(50):29907-19
pubmed: 26483550
PLoS Genet. 2015 Oct 22;11(10):e1005601
pubmed: 26491874
Reprod Biomed Online. 2016 Feb;32(2):137-41
pubmed: 26687905
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:7193075
pubmed: 26942198
Fertil Steril. 2016 Aug;106(2):244-50
pubmed: 27421614
Reproduction. 2017 Feb;153(2):R69-R83
pubmed: 27815559
Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Nov 1;23(6):706-722
pubmed: 28961822
Fertil Steril. 2018 Mar;109(3):460-466.e2
pubmed: 29428306
Am J Reprod Immunol. 2018 Jul;80(1):e12845
pubmed: 29533498
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;30(3):185-196
pubmed: 29664791
Hum Mol Genet. 2018 Jul 15;27(14):2573-2585
pubmed: 29688390
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 25;5:CD011320
pubmed: 29800485
Hum Reprod. 2018 Nov 1;33(11):1992-2001
pubmed: 30265329
Reprod Biomed Online. 2018 Sep;37(3):349-357
pubmed: 30314887
Nature. 1988 Mar 31;332(6163):459-61
pubmed: 3352746
Biol Reprod. 1981 Aug;25(1):191-5
pubmed: 6793100
Arch Biochem Biophys. 1997 Jan 15;337(2):261-6
pubmed: 9016821
Cell. 1997 Oct 17;91(2):197-208
pubmed: 9346237
Hum Reprod. 1998 Apr;13(4):1014-9
pubmed: 9619563