EEG microstates distinguish between cognitive components of fluid reasoning.
Adult
Aptitude
/ physiology
Cerebral Cortex
/ diagnostic imaging
Electroencephalography
/ methods
Female
Functional Neuroimaging
/ methods
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Multimodal Imaging
Nerve Net
/ diagnostic imaging
Pattern Recognition, Visual
/ physiology
Psychomotor Performance
/ physiology
Thinking
/ physiology
Young Adult
Cognitive abilities
EEG
Fluid reasoning
Microstates
Visuospatial
Journal
NeuroImage
ISSN: 1095-9572
Titre abrégé: Neuroimage
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9215515
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 04 2019
01 04 2019
Historique:
received:
16
03
2018
revised:
14
01
2019
accepted:
26
01
2019
pubmed:
3
2
2019
medline:
25
1
2020
entrez:
3
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Fluid reasoning is considered central to general intelligence. How its psychometric structure relates to brain function remains poorly understood. For instance, what is the dynamic composition of ability-specific processes underlying fluid reasoning? We investigated whether distinct fluid reasoning abilities could be differentiated by electroencephalography (EEG) microstate profiles. EEG microstates specifically capture rapidly altering activity of distributed cortical networks with a high temporal resolution as scalp potential topographies that dynamically vary over time in an organized manner. EEG was recorded simultaneously with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in twenty healthy adult participants during cognitively distinct fluid reasoning tasks: induction, spatial relationships and visualization. Microstate parameters successfully discriminated between fluid reasoning and visuomotor control tasks as well as between the fluid reasoning tasks. Mainly, microstate B coverage was significantly higher during spatial relationships and visualization, compared to induction, while microstate C coverage was significantly decreased during spatial relationships and visualization, compared to induction. Additionally, microstate D coverage was highest during spatial relationships and microstate A coverage was most strongly reduced during the same condition. Consistently, multivariate analysis with a leave-one-out cross-validation procedure accurately classified the fluid reasoning tasks based on the coverage parameter. These EEG data and their correlation with fMRI data suggest that especially the tasks most strongly relying on visuospatial processing modulated visual and default mode network activity. We propose that EEG microstates can provide valuable information about neural activity patterns with a dynamic and complex temporal structure during fluid reasoning, suggesting cognitive ability-specific interplays between multiple brain networks.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30710677
pii: S1053-8119(19)30073-4
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.067
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
560-573Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.