Identification of residual-recurrent cholesteatoma in operated ears: diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy CT and MRI.
Cholesteatoma
Diffusion-weighted images
Dual-energy CT
Magnetic resonance imaging
Recurrence
Journal
La Radiologia medica
ISSN: 1826-6983
Titre abrégé: Radiol Med
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 0177625
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
received:
10
10
2018
accepted:
24
01
2019
pubmed:
4
2
2019
medline:
25
6
2019
entrez:
4
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) to identify residual-recurrent cholesteatoma using the second-look surgery as the reference standard. This prospective, institutional review board-approved study included 19 consecutive patients (11 males and 8 females; mean age of 62.2, range 34-80 years). Since five patients were studied bilaterally, a total of 24 ears were evaluated with DECT and MRI between February 2017 and June 2018. Any abnormal middle ear attenuation on high-resolution CT images (HRCT) or DECT color-coded maps, and any abnormal signal on MRI images was evaluated by four experienced radiologists. Diagnostic accuracy values of HRCT, DECT maps and CT numbers (by using receiver operator curves) and MRI were compared. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement were calculated. Residual-recurrent cholesteatoma was diagnosed at surgery in 16/24 ears (66.6%). MRI and DECT revealed a total of 15/16 and 14/16 cholesteatomas, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV and accuracy of MRI and DECT were 93.7, 87.5, 93.7, 87.5, and 91.6% and 87.5, 87.5, 93.3, 87.5 and 87.5%, respectively. CT numbers were significantly different between positive (mean 57.6 HU, range - 65, 112 HU) and negative cases (mean 5.4 HU, range - 100, 66 HU) with p < 0.001. The interobserver and intraobserver agreement were k = 0.87 and k = 0.83, respectively. DECT may provide an accurate demonstration of residual-recurrent middle ear cholesteatoma.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30712164
doi: 10.1007/s11547-019-00997-y
pii: 10.1007/s11547-019-00997-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
478-486Références
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 2000;121(2):79-81
pubmed: 10997063
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001 Jun-Jul;22(6):1089-96
pubmed: 11415903
Eur J Radiol. 2003 Mar;45(3):169-84
pubmed: 12595101
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Jul;181(1):261-5
pubmed: 12818870
Eur Radiol. 2004 Mar;14(3):482-95
pubmed: 14749948
Eur Radiol. 2006 Feb;16(2):256-68
pubmed: 16341833
Eur Radiol. 2007 Jun;17(6):1510-7
pubmed: 17151859
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2011 Sep;17(3):181-94
pubmed: 20945292
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Mar;33(3):439-44
pubmed: 22194383
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2012 Jun;129(3):148-52
pubmed: 22321912
Radiographics. 2012 Jul-Aug;32(4):1197-213
pubmed: 22787002
Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Jan;26(74):7-12
pubmed: 24505568
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Sep;35(9):1820-4
pubmed: 24812017
J Neuroradiol. 2015 Jul;42(4):193-201
pubmed: 25015879
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Sep;9(9):TC07-10
pubmed: 26500978
Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1057):20150300
pubmed: 26537691
Radiology. 2016 Jul;280(1):177-83
pubmed: 27322974
Radiology. 2016 Dec;281(3):690-707
pubmed: 27870622
J Int Adv Otol. 2017 Apr;13(1):1-8
pubmed: 28059056
Radiology. 2017 Jul;284(1):161-168
pubmed: 28240561
Eur J Radiol Open. 2017 Mar 23;4:27-39
pubmed: 28377947
World J Radiol. 2017 May 28;9(5):217-222
pubmed: 28634512
Radiology. 2018 Jan;286(1):214-216
pubmed: 29261468
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 21;12(12):e0189997
pubmed: 29267386
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Mar;39(3):441-447
pubmed: 29348131
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Apr;39(4):658-662
pubmed: 29439124
Radiol Med. 2018 Aug;123(8):593-600
pubmed: 29637389
Radiol Clin North Am. 1984 Mar;22(1):15-35
pubmed: 6709867