Clinical relevance of pancreatobiliary and intestinal subtypes of ampullary and duodenal adenocarcinoma: Pattern of recurrence, chemotherapy, and survival after pancreatoduodenectomy.


Journal

Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.]
ISSN: 1424-3911
Titre abrégé: Pancreatology
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 100966936

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Historique:
received: 21 06 2018
revised: 07 11 2018
accepted: 24 01 2019
pubmed: 5 2 2019
medline: 8 8 2019
entrez: 5 2 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The clinical relevance of the classification of ampullary adenocarcinoma (AC) into pancreatobiliary (PB) or intestinal (Int) subtypes has not been resolved. Clinicopathological factors, survival, and localization and treatment of recurrence were investigated for patients with AC and duodenal adenocarcinoma (DC) treated by pancreatoduodenectomy from 2000 to 2015. A total of 109 AC (45 PB, 64 Int) and 71 DC (all Int) were identified. Median overall survival (OS) for ACPB vs DC vs ACInt was 43.6 vs 51 vs 75 months, respectively. ACPB had significantly shorter OS than ACInt (p = 0.036). However, for AC stage (HR = 2.39; 95 %CI 1.23-4.64, p = 0.010) was the only factor associated with mortality risk in multivariate analysis. Localization of recurrence (n = 88) was predominantly distant (ACPB 81.5%; ACInt 92%; DC 91.7%, p = 0.371). Post-recurrence survival (PRS) for ACPB, ACInt and DC did not differ (6.9 vs 9.2 vs 7.5 months, p = 0.755). Best supportive care or palliative chemotherapy were offered for recurrent disease to 44.5%/48.1% for ACPB, 40%/56% for ACInt, and 41.7%/52.8% for DC (p = 0.947). The choice of chemotherapy regimen varied considerably. Five patients underwent surgical resection or ablation with curative intent. All deaths among ACPB were caused by recurrent disease, whereas 29.4% of ACInt and 23.1% of DC deaths was non-cancer related or caused by other specific cancer. ACPB, ACInt and DC have similar recurrence patterns and PRS. The difference in survival between ACPB and ACInt was not statistically significant when stratified by stage. The optimal chemotherapy in patients with recurrent AC remains undefined.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The clinical relevance of the classification of ampullary adenocarcinoma (AC) into pancreatobiliary (PB) or intestinal (Int) subtypes has not been resolved.
METHODS METHODS
Clinicopathological factors, survival, and localization and treatment of recurrence were investigated for patients with AC and duodenal adenocarcinoma (DC) treated by pancreatoduodenectomy from 2000 to 2015.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 109 AC (45 PB, 64 Int) and 71 DC (all Int) were identified. Median overall survival (OS) for ACPB vs DC vs ACInt was 43.6 vs 51 vs 75 months, respectively. ACPB had significantly shorter OS than ACInt (p = 0.036). However, for AC stage (HR = 2.39; 95 %CI 1.23-4.64, p = 0.010) was the only factor associated with mortality risk in multivariate analysis. Localization of recurrence (n = 88) was predominantly distant (ACPB 81.5%; ACInt 92%; DC 91.7%, p = 0.371). Post-recurrence survival (PRS) for ACPB, ACInt and DC did not differ (6.9 vs 9.2 vs 7.5 months, p = 0.755). Best supportive care or palliative chemotherapy were offered for recurrent disease to 44.5%/48.1% for ACPB, 40%/56% for ACInt, and 41.7%/52.8% for DC (p = 0.947). The choice of chemotherapy regimen varied considerably. Five patients underwent surgical resection or ablation with curative intent. All deaths among ACPB were caused by recurrent disease, whereas 29.4% of ACInt and 23.1% of DC deaths was non-cancer related or caused by other specific cancer.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
ACPB, ACInt and DC have similar recurrence patterns and PRS. The difference in survival between ACPB and ACInt was not statistically significant when stratified by stage. The optimal chemotherapy in patients with recurrent AC remains undefined.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30713128
pii: S1424-3903(19)30020-1
doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2019.01.019
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antineoplastic Agents 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

316-324

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Inger Marie Bowitz Lothe (IM)

Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Dyre Kleive (D)

Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.

Ewa Pomianowska (E)

Department of Surgery, Baerum Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Norway.

Milada Cvancarova (M)

Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.

Elin Kure (E)

Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Svein Dueland (S)

Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.

Ivar P Gladhaug (IP)

Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.

Knut Jørgen Labori (KJ)

Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Norway. Electronic address: uxknab@ous-hf.no.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH