Can acoustic structural quantification be used to characterize the ultrasound echotexture of the peripheral zone of breast lesions?

ASQ B mode BI-RADS Ultrasound breast cancer breast lesion breast neoplasms diagnostic imaging halo peripheral rim peripheral zone sonography

Journal

Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation
ISSN: 1875-8622
Titre abrégé: Clin Hemorheol Microcirc
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9709206

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
pubmed: 5 2 2019
medline: 14 11 2019
entrez: 5 2 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Besides mammography, breast ultrasound is the most important imaging modality for women with suspected breast cancer. New software tools bear high potential for improved detectability and specification of malignant breast lesions. To compare the halo depicted around malignant breast lesions by ultrasound using Acoustic Structure Quantification (ASQ) of raw image data with the echogenic rim seen in B-mode ultrasound. This retrospective study included 37 women for whom conventional B-mode ultrasound of the breast and ASQ were available as well as histopathology findings for comparison. Software tools were used to measure the halo area or echogenic rim and tumor area and calculate halo-to-lesion ratios for the two ultrasound modes. Six inexperienced readers characterized the breast lesions based on this information. Specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were determined. ANOVA, the Wilcoxon test, and ROC curve analysis were performed. There was a linear relationship between ASQ-based and B-mode-based halo-to-lesion ratios; however, a systematic error was also noted. ASQ-derived ratios tended to be higher for breast lesions with lymphangioinvasion (p = 0.051, n.s.) and higher N-stages (p > 0.925, n.s.), while there was no correlation with other markers. Because of the significantly greater conspicuity of peritumoral halos in the ASQ mode, inexperienced readers achieved greater sensitivity (78% vs. 74%) and specificity (75% vs. 71%) and higher NPVs (75% vs. 71%) and PPVs (78% vs. 74%) compared with B-mode images. Greater halo conspicuity affected the identification of malignant lesions with both modes; ASQ was found to be particularly well suited (FBimage (1,100) = 19.253, p < 0.001; FASQ (1,100) = 52.338, p < 0.001). The inexperienced readers were significantly more confident about their diagnosis using the ASQ maps (z = -3.023, p = 0.003). We conclude that the halo in ASQ and the echogenic rim in B-mode ultrasound are attributable to different morphologic correlates. ASQ improves diagnostic accuracy and confidence of inexperienced examiners because of improved halo visibility.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Besides mammography, breast ultrasound is the most important imaging modality for women with suspected breast cancer. New software tools bear high potential for improved detectability and specification of malignant breast lesions.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To compare the halo depicted around malignant breast lesions by ultrasound using Acoustic Structure Quantification (ASQ) of raw image data with the echogenic rim seen in B-mode ultrasound.
METHODS METHODS
This retrospective study included 37 women for whom conventional B-mode ultrasound of the breast and ASQ were available as well as histopathology findings for comparison. Software tools were used to measure the halo area or echogenic rim and tumor area and calculate halo-to-lesion ratios for the two ultrasound modes. Six inexperienced readers characterized the breast lesions based on this information. Specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were determined. ANOVA, the Wilcoxon test, and ROC curve analysis were performed.
RESULTS RESULTS
There was a linear relationship between ASQ-based and B-mode-based halo-to-lesion ratios; however, a systematic error was also noted. ASQ-derived ratios tended to be higher for breast lesions with lymphangioinvasion (p = 0.051, n.s.) and higher N-stages (p > 0.925, n.s.), while there was no correlation with other markers. Because of the significantly greater conspicuity of peritumoral halos in the ASQ mode, inexperienced readers achieved greater sensitivity (78% vs. 74%) and specificity (75% vs. 71%) and higher NPVs (75% vs. 71%) and PPVs (78% vs. 74%) compared with B-mode images. Greater halo conspicuity affected the identification of malignant lesions with both modes; ASQ was found to be particularly well suited (FBimage (1,100) = 19.253, p < 0.001; FASQ (1,100) = 52.338, p < 0.001). The inexperienced readers were significantly more confident about their diagnosis using the ASQ maps (z = -3.023, p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
We conclude that the halo in ASQ and the echogenic rim in B-mode ultrasound are attributable to different morphologic correlates. ASQ improves diagnostic accuracy and confidence of inexperienced examiners because of improved halo visibility.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30714952
pii: CH180484
doi: 10.3233/CH-180484
pmc: PMC6700716
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

189-200

Références

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000 Oct;26(8):1243-52
pubmed: 11120360
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2001 Mar;48(2):569-80
pubmed: 11370371
Semin Roentgenol. 2001 Jul;36(3):217-25
pubmed: 11475068
Radiology. 2002 Oct;225(1):165-75
pubmed: 12355001
Ultraschall Med. 2002 Dec;23(6):383-7
pubmed: 12514754
Radiology. 2006 May;239(2):385-91
pubmed: 16569780
Ultraschall Med. 2006 Aug;27(4):374-9
pubmed: 16927216
Radiology. 2007 Jan;242(1):63-9
pubmed: 17090709
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1993;12(4):687-92
pubmed: 18218463
Eur J Radiol. 2009 Jan;69(1):6-13
pubmed: 18818037
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Oct;193(4):1037-43
pubmed: 19770327
Breast J. 2010 May-Jun;16(3):233-9
pubmed: 20565468
Acta Radiol. 2010 Oct;51(8):885-94
pubmed: 20735278
Breast Care (Basel). 2010;5(2):109-114
pubmed: 20847824
Rofo. 2011 Sep;183(9):826-33
pubmed: 21442559
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2012;52(2-4):93-106
pubmed: 22975935
Eur Radiol. 2013 Aug;23(8):2051-60
pubmed: 23579418
Breast Cancer. 2015 Jan;22(1):66-70
pubmed: 25336185
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Feb;204(2):234-40
pubmed: 25615743
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2015;61(2):143-50
pubmed: 26519228
J Med Ultrason (2001). 2005 Dec;32(4):135-44
pubmed: 27277480
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2016;64(4):747-755
pubmed: 27792004
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2017;66(4):333-345
pubmed: 28387663
Rofo. 2017 May;189(5):431-440
pubmed: 28449169
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2018;70(3):291-300
pubmed: 29710688
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2019;71(1):39-51
pubmed: 29865043
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2019;71(3):311-324
pubmed: 29865044
Ultrason Imaging. 1988 Apr;10(2):81-9
pubmed: 3057714
J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Jul;96(1):1-9
pubmed: 8064012
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1993 Jan;53(1):20-3
pubmed: 8382650
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1998 Jan;24(1):93-100
pubmed: 9483775

Auteurs

Annika Bach (A)

Department of Radiology, University Berlin, Charité, Berlin, Germany.

Clarissa Hameister (C)

Department of Radiology, University Berlin, Charité, Berlin, Germany.

Torsten Slowinski (T)

Department of Nephrology, University Berlin, Charité, Berlin, Germany.

Ernst Michael Jung (EM)

Department of Radiology and Interdisciplinary Ultrasound Centre, Universitary Hospital, Regensburg, Germany.

Anke Thomas (A)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Ultrasound Research Laboratory, University Berlin, Charité, Berlin, Germany.

Thomas Fischer (T)

Department of Radiology and Interdisciplinary Ultrasound Centre and Ultrasound Research Laboratory, University Berlin, Charité, Berlin, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH