Dynamic changes in ABA content in water-stressed Populus nigra: effects on carbon fixation and soluble carbohydrates.
Populus nigra
9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase (NCED)
ABA-GE
Abscisic acid (ABA)
bioenergy crop
gene expression
intrinsic water-use efficiency (WUEint)
leaf gas exchange
leaf hydraulic conductance
soluble carbohydrates
water deficit
Journal
Annals of botany
ISSN: 1095-8290
Titre abrégé: Ann Bot
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372347
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 10 2019
29 10 2019
Historique:
received:
15
05
2018
accepted:
03
01
2019
pubmed:
5
2
2019
medline:
19
3
2020
entrez:
5
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Hydraulic and chemical signals operate in tandem to regulate systemic plant responses to drought. Transport of abscisic acid (ABA) through the xylem and phloem from the root to shoot has been suggested to serve as the main signal of water deficit. There is evidence that ABA and its ABA-glycosyl-ester (ABA-GE) are also formed in leaves and stems through the chloroplastic 2-C-methylerythritol-5-phosphate (MEP) pathway. This study aimed to evaluate how hormonal and hydraulic signals contribute to optimize stomatal (gs), mesophyll (gm) and leaf hydraulic (Kleaf) conductance under well-watered and water-stressed conditions in Populus nigra (black poplar) plants. In addition, we assessed possible relationships between ABA and soluble carbohydrates within the leaf and stem. Plants were subjected to three water treatments: well-watered (WW), moderate stress (WS1) and severe stress (WS2). This experimental set-up enabled a time-course analysis of the response to water deficit at the physiological [leaf gas exchange, plant water relations, (Kleaf)], biochemical (ABA and its metabolite/catabolite quantification in xylem sap, leaves, wood, bark and roots) and molecular (gene expression of ABA biosynthesis) levels. Our results showed strong coordination between gs, gm and Kleaf under water stress, which reduced transpiration and increased intrinsic water use efficiency (WUEint). Analysis of gene expression of 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase (NCED) and ABA content in different tissues showed a general up-regulation of the biosynthesis of this hormone and its finely-tuned catabolism in response to water stress. Significant linear relationships were found between soluble carbohydrates and ABA contents in both leaves and stems, suggesting a putative function for this hormone in carbohydrate mobilization under severe water stress. This study demonstrates the tight regulation of the photosynthetic machinery by levels of ABA in different plants organs on a daily basis in both well-watered and water stress conditions to optimize WUEint and coordinate whole plant acclimation responses to drought.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Hydraulic and chemical signals operate in tandem to regulate systemic plant responses to drought. Transport of abscisic acid (ABA) through the xylem and phloem from the root to shoot has been suggested to serve as the main signal of water deficit. There is evidence that ABA and its ABA-glycosyl-ester (ABA-GE) are also formed in leaves and stems through the chloroplastic 2-C-methylerythritol-5-phosphate (MEP) pathway. This study aimed to evaluate how hormonal and hydraulic signals contribute to optimize stomatal (gs), mesophyll (gm) and leaf hydraulic (Kleaf) conductance under well-watered and water-stressed conditions in Populus nigra (black poplar) plants. In addition, we assessed possible relationships between ABA and soluble carbohydrates within the leaf and stem.
METHODS
Plants were subjected to three water treatments: well-watered (WW), moderate stress (WS1) and severe stress (WS2). This experimental set-up enabled a time-course analysis of the response to water deficit at the physiological [leaf gas exchange, plant water relations, (Kleaf)], biochemical (ABA and its metabolite/catabolite quantification in xylem sap, leaves, wood, bark and roots) and molecular (gene expression of ABA biosynthesis) levels.
KEY RESULTS
Our results showed strong coordination between gs, gm and Kleaf under water stress, which reduced transpiration and increased intrinsic water use efficiency (WUEint). Analysis of gene expression of 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase (NCED) and ABA content in different tissues showed a general up-regulation of the biosynthesis of this hormone and its finely-tuned catabolism in response to water stress. Significant linear relationships were found between soluble carbohydrates and ABA contents in both leaves and stems, suggesting a putative function for this hormone in carbohydrate mobilization under severe water stress.
CONCLUSIONS
This study demonstrates the tight regulation of the photosynthetic machinery by levels of ABA in different plants organs on a daily basis in both well-watered and water stress conditions to optimize WUEint and coordinate whole plant acclimation responses to drought.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30715123
pii: 5305975
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcz005
pmc: PMC6821382
doi:
Substances chimiques
Carbohydrates
0
Water
059QF0KO0R
Abscisic Acid
72S9A8J5GW
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
627-644Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
J AOAC Int. 2004 Sep-Oct;87(5):1200-7
pubmed: 15493679
Planta. 1985 Aug;165(3):397-406
pubmed: 24241146
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 10;11(2):e0148554
pubmed: 26862904
Plant Physiol. 2009 Apr;149(4):2000-12
pubmed: 19211703
Planta. 1981 Oct;153(2):156-65
pubmed: 24276766
Sci Rep. 2015 Jul 24;5:12449
pubmed: 26207993
Tree Physiol. 2007 May;27(5):679-88
pubmed: 17267359
Plant J. 2009 Jun;58(6):1068-82
pubmed: 19222804
New Phytol. 2013 Jan;197(1):65-72
pubmed: 23106390
Plant Cell Environ. 2008 May;31(5):602-21
pubmed: 17996013
Curr Biol. 2006 May 9;16(9):882-7
pubmed: 16682349
Anal Biochem. 2011 Jan 15;408(2):337-9
pubmed: 20816740
J Exp Bot. 2012 Jan;63(2):643-58
pubmed: 22016424
Plant Mol Biol. 2004 Mar;54(5):713-25
pubmed: 15356390
J Exp Bot. 2016 Oct;67(18):5301-5311
pubmed: 27440939
Tree Physiol. 2008 Jul;28(7):1007-15
pubmed: 18450565
Plant Physiol. 2016 May;171(1):265-79
pubmed: 26977088
Ann Bot. 2006 Dec;98(6):1301-10
pubmed: 17028296
Tree Physiol. 2012 Apr;32(4):423-34
pubmed: 22544048
Cell. 2006 Sep 22;126(6):1109-20
pubmed: 16990135
J Exp Bot. 2013 Oct;64(13):3965-81
pubmed: 24123453
Tree Physiol. 2005 Apr;25(4):505-12
pubmed: 15687099
Plant Sci. 2016 Oct;251:82-89
pubmed: 27593466
Plant J. 2011 Sep;67(5):795-804
pubmed: 21564354
Plant Cell Environ. 2002 Feb;25(2):195-210
pubmed: 11841663
C R Biol. 2010 Apr;333(4):307-19
pubmed: 20371105
Physiol Plant. 2008 Nov;134(3):412-20
pubmed: 18513374
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 17;11(6):e0157089
pubmed: 27315081
Trends Plant Sci. 2013 Jun;18(6):325-33
pubmed: 23453706
Plant Cell Environ. 2018 Feb;41(2):436-450
pubmed: 29220546
Plant Cell Environ. 2007 Sep;30(9):1126-49
pubmed: 17661751
J Exp Bot. 2018 Jul 18;69(16):4033-4045
pubmed: 29788146
Plant Physiol. 2012 Oct;160(2):955-64
pubmed: 22837359
Tree Physiol. 2017 Feb 1;37(2):236-245
pubmed: 28399262
Plant Mol Biol. 1999 Jan;39(2):373-80
pubmed: 10080702
Plant J. 2011 Jul;67(1):72-80
pubmed: 21401747
Plant Dis. 2013 Mar;97(3):363-368
pubmed: 30722359
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2016 Dec;34:1-8
pubmed: 27340874
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2009 Apr;47(4):256-61
pubmed: 19167901
Ann Bot. 2009 Feb;103(4):551-60
pubmed: 18662937
Plant Cell Environ. 2014 Aug;37(8):1950-64
pubmed: 24738622
Int J Mol Sci. 2012 Dec 24;14(1):359-77
pubmed: 23263667
Plant Cell Physiol. 2015 Jun;56(6):1043-52
pubmed: 25917608
Plant Cell. 2015 Jul;27(7):1945-54
pubmed: 26163575
Tree Physiol. 2003 Jul;23(10):695-704
pubmed: 12777242
Tree Physiol. 2017 Dec 1;37(12):1637-1647
pubmed: 28981861
Plant J. 2001 Aug;27(4):325-33
pubmed: 11532178
Plant Physiol. 2007 Jan;143(1):122-33
pubmed: 17114274
J Exp Bot. 2011 Oct;62(14):5207-16
pubmed: 21813795
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 02;9(9):e109054
pubmed: 25275452
Plant Physiol. 2008 Aug;147(4):1984-93
pubmed: 18550687
Tree Physiol. 1999 Jul;19(8):503-510
pubmed: 12651540
Planta. 2000 Nov;211(6):874-82
pubmed: 11144273
Plant Cell Environ. 2017 Sep;40(9):1940-1959
pubmed: 28620951
J Exp Bot. 2015 Apr;66(8):2227-37
pubmed: 25770586
Plant Physiol. 2006 Aug;141(4):1676-83
pubmed: 16766667
Plant Cell Environ. 2010 Nov;33(11):1898-910
pubmed: 20561253
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50226
pubmed: 23185583
J Exp Bot. 2002 Feb;53(367):195-200
pubmed: 11807122
J Exp Bot. 2009;60(8):2325-39
pubmed: 19443613
Plant Physiol. 1997 Feb;113(2):559-573
pubmed: 12223626
Plant Cell. 2016 Aug;28(8):1860-78
pubmed: 27436713
Plant Cell Environ. 2016 Nov;39(11):2350-2360
pubmed: 27187245
Plant Cell Environ. 2008 Dec;31(12):1803-12
pubmed: 18771574
Science. 1965 Apr 16;148(3668):339-46
pubmed: 17832103
Plant J. 2017 Jul;91(2):325-339
pubmed: 28390076
Plant Mol Biol. 2017 May;94(1-2):61-78
pubmed: 28247243
Plant Physiol. 2004 Apr;134(4):1824-33
pubmed: 15064368
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2018 Jun;43:76-81
pubmed: 29448177
Plant Signal Behav. 2015;10(5):e1017177
pubmed: 26039476
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jun 14;113(24):6791-6
pubmed: 27247417
Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 May 1;29(9):e45
pubmed: 11328886
Plant Cell Environ. 2015 Mar;38(3):388-98
pubmed: 24995523
Plant J. 2001 May;26(4):421-33
pubmed: 11439129
Plant J. 2006 Nov;48(3):427-39
pubmed: 17010114
Plant Physiol. 1992 Apr;98(4):1429-36
pubmed: 16668811
J Exp Bot. 2002 Feb;53(367):251-63
pubmed: 11807129
Plant Physiol. 2003 Aug;132(4):2166-73
pubmed: 12913171
Plant Cell Physiol. 2015 Dec;56(12):2457-66
pubmed: 26542111
Photosynth Res. 2013 Nov;117(1-3):45-59
pubmed: 23670217
Plant Physiol. 1992 Apr;98(4):1437-43
pubmed: 16668812
Plant Physiol. 2011 Mar;155(3):1051-9
pubmed: 21239620
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2002 Feb;5(1):26-32
pubmed: 11788304
J Exp Bot. 2000 May;51(346):937-44
pubmed: 10948220
J Exp Bot. 2014 Jul;65(12):3143-56
pubmed: 24799563
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38554
pubmed: 22685583
Plant Mol Biol. 2009 Mar;69(4):419-27
pubmed: 18855103
Bioresour Technol. 2002 May;83(1):37-46
pubmed: 12058829
Plant Cell. 2009 Jul;21(7):2143-62
pubmed: 19638476
Plant J. 2007 Oct;52(1):167-74
pubmed: 17711416
Nature. 2003 Oct 16;425(6959):734-7
pubmed: 14520414
J Exp Bot. 2016 Apr;67(9):2817-27
pubmed: 27012285
J Exp Bot. 2018 Feb 23;69(5):1261-1267
pubmed: 29340606
PLoS One. 2008;3(12):e3935
pubmed: 19081841
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2011 Jan;13(1):28-35
pubmed: 21143722
New Phytol. 2002 Mar;153(3):449-460
pubmed: 33863219
Funct Plant Biol. 2008 Sep;35(7):565-579
pubmed: 32688812
Plant Cell Physiol. 2013 Dec;54(12):1963-75
pubmed: 24058149
Plant Cell Environ. 2011 Nov;34(11):1999-2008
pubmed: 21752031
J Exp Bot. 2011 May;62(8):2615-32
pubmed: 21289079
J Exp Bot. 2003 Aug;54(389):1899-907
pubmed: 12869522
J Exp Bot. 2015 Jul;66(14):4373-81
pubmed: 25954045
Funct Plant Biol. 2012 Jun;39(5):394-401
pubmed: 32480791
Funct Plant Biol. 2002 Apr;29(4):461-471
pubmed: 32689491
Tree Physiol. 2009 Jul;29(7):879-87
pubmed: 19429900
Trends Plant Sci. 2018 Jun;23(6):513-522
pubmed: 29731225
J Plant Physiol. 2017 Jun;213:148-156
pubmed: 28384532
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2005;56:165-85
pubmed: 15862093
Plant Cell Environ. 2007 Aug;30(8):922-33
pubmed: 17617820
Plant Cell Environ. 2016 Mar;39(3):485-91
pubmed: 26353082
Plant Physiol. 2017 Nov;175(3):1121-1134
pubmed: 28899961
Plant Physiol. 2004 Apr;134(4):1439-49
pubmed: 15064374
J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403-10
pubmed: 2231712
J Exp Bot. 2011 Jan;62(3):869-82
pubmed: 21172816
J Exp Bot. 2009;60(8):2283-90
pubmed: 19395388
Plant Physiol. 2007 Apr;143(4):1905-17
pubmed: 17277097