Noise-resistant developmental reproducibility in vertebrate somite formation.
Animals
Artifacts
Body Patterning
/ physiology
Circadian Rhythm Signaling Peptides and Proteins
Developmental Biology
/ methods
Embryo, Mammalian
Embryonic Development
/ physiology
Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental
/ physiology
MAP Kinase Signaling System
Mesoderm
Models, Molecular
Reproducibility of Results
Somites
/ physiology
Zebrafish
/ embryology
Journal
PLoS computational biology
ISSN: 1553-7358
Titre abrégé: PLoS Comput Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101238922
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2019
02 2019
Historique:
received:
01
02
2018
accepted:
04
10
2018
entrez:
5
2
2019
pubmed:
5
2
2019
medline:
13
3
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The reproducibility of embryonic development is remarkable, although molecular processes are intrinsically stochastic at the single-cell level. How the multicellular system resists the inevitable noise to acquire developmental reproducibility constitutes a fundamental question in developmental biology. Toward this end, we focused on vertebrate somitogenesis as a representative system, because somites are repeatedly reproduced within a single embryo whereas such reproducibility is lost in segmentation clock gene-deficient embryos. However, the effect of noise on developmental reproducibility has not been fully investigated, because of the technical difficulty in manipulating the noise intensity in experiments. In this study, we developed a computational model of ERK-mediated somitogenesis, in which bistable ERK activity is regulated by an FGF gradient, cell-cell communication, and the segmentation clock, subject to the intrinsic noise. The model simulation generated our previous in vivo observation that the ERK activity was distributed in a step-like gradient in the presomitic mesoderm, and its boundary was posteriorly shifted by the clock in a stepwise manner, leading to regular somite formation. Here, we showed that this somite regularity was robustly maintained against the noise. Removing the clock from the model predicted that the stepwise shift of the ERK activity occurs at irregular timing with irregular distance owing to the noise, resulting in somite size variation. This model prediction was recently confirmed by live imaging of ERK activity in zebrafish embryos. Through theoretical analysis, we presented a mechanism by which the clock reduces the inherent somite irregularity observed in clock-deficient embryos. Therefore, this study indicates a novel role of the segmentation clock in noise-resistant developmental reproducibility.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30716091
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006579
pii: PCOMPBIOL-D-18-00171
pmc: PMC6361423
doi:
Substances chimiques
Circadian Rhythm Signaling Peptides and Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1006579Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Mar 16;107(11):4979-84
pubmed: 20194769
Science. 2014 Feb 14;343(6172):791-795
pubmed: 24407478
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jan 31;103(5):1313-8
pubmed: 16432209
Nat Genet. 2004 Jul;36(7):750-4
pubmed: 15170214
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014 Nov;15(11):709-21
pubmed: 25335437
Development. 2002 Mar;129(5):1175-83
pubmed: 11874913
Development. 2001 Dec;128(23):4873-80
pubmed: 11731466
Curr Biol. 2003 Aug 19;13(16):1398-408
pubmed: 12932323
Science. 2007 Sep 28;317(5846):1911-5
pubmed: 17702912
Oncogene. 2005 Mar 3;24(10):1718-26
pubmed: 15608667
Development. 2014 Mar;141(5):1104-9
pubmed: 24504340
Genes Dev. 2001 Oct 15;15(20):2642-7
pubmed: 11641270
Dev Dyn. 2007 Jun;236(6):1495-508
pubmed: 17497689
J Theor Biol. 1976 May 21;58(2):455-76
pubmed: 940335
Nat Rev Genet. 2008 May;9(5):370-82
pubmed: 18414404
Curr Biol. 1998 Sep 10;8(18):1027-30
pubmed: 9740806
Nature. 2000 Nov 23;408(6811):475-9
pubmed: 11100729
Cell. 2001 Jul 27;106(2):219-32
pubmed: 11511349
Science. 2002 Aug 16;297(5584):1183-6
pubmed: 12183631
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2007;72:445-9
pubmed: 18419303
Cell. 2008 Oct 17;135(2):216-26
pubmed: 18957198
J Theor Biol. 2008 Nov 21;255(2):259-66
pubmed: 18789338
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 8;108(10):4018-23
pubmed: 21368122
PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Oct;7(10):e1002155
pubmed: 21998560
Nature. 2006 Jun 8;441(7094):719-23
pubmed: 16760970
Nature. 2004 Jan 29;427(6973):419-22
pubmed: 14749824
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 12;8(1):4335
pubmed: 29531317
J Theor Biol. 2001 Nov 21;213(2):171-81
pubmed: 11894989
Nat Rev Genet. 2006 Jan;7(1):34-44
pubmed: 16369570
Science. 1998 May 8;280(5365):895-8
pubmed: 9572732
Development. 2002 Aug;129(15):3693-704
pubmed: 12117818
Dev Cell. 2003 Mar;4(3):395-406
pubmed: 12636920
Science. 2005 Sep 23;309(5743):2010-3
pubmed: 16179466
Curr Biol. 2010 Jul 27;20(14):1254-8
pubmed: 20637625
Development. 2011 Jul;138(13):2783-92
pubmed: 21652651