A discussion of statistical methods to characterise early growth and its impact on bone mineral content later in childhood.
Growth mixture models
SITAR
lifecourse epidemiology
linear spline models
multilevel models
Journal
Annals of human biology
ISSN: 1464-5033
Titre abrégé: Ann Hum Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0404024
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
6
2
2019
medline:
13
7
2019
entrez:
6
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Many statistical methods are available to model longitudinal growth data and relate derived summary measures to later outcomes. To apply and compare commonly used methods to a realistic scenario including pre- and postnatal data, missing data, and confounders. Data were collected from 753 offspring in the Southampton Women's Survey with measurements of bone mineral content (BMC) at age 6 years. Ultrasound measures included crown-rump length (11 weeks' gestation) and femur length (19 and 34 weeks' gestation); postnatally, infant length (birth, 6 and 12 months) and height (2 and 3 years) were measured. A residual growth model, two-stage multilevel linear spline model, joint multilevel linear spline model, SITAR and a growth mixture model were used to relate growth to 6-year BMC. Results from the residual growth, two-stage and joint multilevel linear spline models were most comparable: an increase in length at all ages was positively associated with BMC, the strongest association being with later growth. Both SITAR and the growth mixture model demonstrated that length was positively associated with BMC. Similarities and differences in results from a variety of analytic strategies need to be understood in the context of each statistical methodology.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Many statistical methods are available to model longitudinal growth data and relate derived summary measures to later outcomes.
AIM
OBJECTIVE
To apply and compare commonly used methods to a realistic scenario including pre- and postnatal data, missing data, and confounders.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
METHODS
Data were collected from 753 offspring in the Southampton Women's Survey with measurements of bone mineral content (BMC) at age 6 years. Ultrasound measures included crown-rump length (11 weeks' gestation) and femur length (19 and 34 weeks' gestation); postnatally, infant length (birth, 6 and 12 months) and height (2 and 3 years) were measured. A residual growth model, two-stage multilevel linear spline model, joint multilevel linear spline model, SITAR and a growth mixture model were used to relate growth to 6-year BMC.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Results from the residual growth, two-stage and joint multilevel linear spline models were most comparable: an increase in length at all ages was positively associated with BMC, the strongest association being with later growth. Both SITAR and the growth mixture model demonstrated that length was positively associated with BMC.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Similarities and differences in results from a variety of analytic strategies need to be understood in the context of each statistical methodology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30719940
doi: 10.1080/03014460.2019.1574896
pmc: PMC6518455
mid: EMS82397
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
17-26Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/R010692/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G1000726
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/P023347/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UP_1005/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_12013/9
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UP_A620_1017
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_12011/4
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P01 AG043362
Pays : United States
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/M012069/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Stat Med. 2001 Mar 15;20(5):685-704
pubmed: 11241571
Stat Med. 2002 Nov 15;21(21):3291-315
pubmed: 12375305
Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2002 Nov-Dec;5(6):559-78
pubmed: 12399830
Osteoporos Int. 2003 Oct;14(10):843-7
pubmed: 12904837
Stat Med. 1992 Jul;11(10):1305-19
pubmed: 1518992
Int J Epidemiol. 2006 Feb;35(1):42-8
pubmed: 16195252
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Dec;58(12):1320-4
pubmed: 16291478
Am J Epidemiol. 2006 Jan 1;163(1):84-96
pubmed: 16306313
Stat Med. 2007 May 30;26(12):2547-64
pubmed: 17061310
Pediatr Res. 2007 May;61(5 Pt 2):5R-10R
pubmed: 17413851
Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 May;89(5):1383-92
pubmed: 19297457
Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Dec;39(6):1558-66
pubmed: 20647267
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Feb;66(2):149-54
pubmed: 21325148
Am J Clin Nutr. 2011 Dec;94(6 Suppl):1808S-1813S
pubmed: 21633072
Stat Med. 2012 Nov 20;31(26):3147-64
pubmed: 22733701
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Oct;42(5):1327-39
pubmed: 24038715
Am J Hum Biol. 2015 Jan-Feb;27(1):69-83
pubmed: 25070272
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Feb;26(1):437-452
pubmed: 25213115
Ann Nutr Metab. 2014;65(2-3):129-38
pubmed: 25413651
Stat Med. 1995 Sep 30;14(18):2009-21
pubmed: 8677401