Romanian version of SDM-Q-9 validation in Internal Medicine and Cardiology setting: a multicentric cross-sectional study.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Atrial Fibrillation
/ psychology
Autoimmune Diseases
/ psychology
Cardiology
/ methods
Child
Child, Preschool
Collagen Diseases
/ psychology
Cross-Sectional Studies
Decision Making, Shared
Female
Humans
Internal Medicine
/ methods
Male
Middle Aged
Reproducibility of Results
Romania
Surveys and Questionnaires
Young Adult
Romania
SDM-Q-9
shared decision making
validation
Journal
Romanian journal of internal medicine = Revue roumaine de medecine interne
ISSN: 2501-062X
Titre abrégé: Rom J Intern Med
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9304507
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jun 2019
01 Jun 2019
Historique:
received:
15
01
2019
pubmed:
6
2
2019
medline:
7
1
2020
entrez:
6
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Shared decision making (SDM) is becoming more and more important for the patient-physician interaction. There has not been a study in Romania evaluating patients' point of view in the SDM process yet. Therefore, the present study aims to evaluate the psychometric parameters of the translated Romanian version of SDM-Q-9. A multicentric cross-sectional study was performed comprising eight recruitment centers. The sample consisted of in- and outpatients who referred to Hospital Units for treatment for atrial fibrillation or collagen diseases. Furthermore, patients who were members of Autoimmune Disease Patient Society were able to participate via an online survey. All participants completed the Romanian translated SDM-Q-9. Altogether, 665 questionnaires were filled in within the hospital setting (n = 324; 48.7%) and online (n = 341; 51.3%). The Romanian version had good internal consistency (Cronbach α coefficient of 0.96.) Corrected item correlations were good ranging from 0.64 to 0.89 with low corrected item correlations for item 1 and item 7. PCA found a one-factorial solution (similar with previous reports) but the first item had the lowest loading. SDM-Q-9 is a useful tool for evaluation and improvement in health care that was validated in Romania and can be used in clinical setting in this country.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Shared decision making (SDM) is becoming more and more important for the patient-physician interaction. There has not been a study in Romania evaluating patients' point of view in the SDM process yet. Therefore, the present study aims to evaluate the psychometric parameters of the translated Romanian version of SDM-Q-9.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
METHODS
A multicentric cross-sectional study was performed comprising eight recruitment centers. The sample consisted of in- and outpatients who referred to Hospital Units for treatment for atrial fibrillation or collagen diseases. Furthermore, patients who were members of Autoimmune Disease Patient Society were able to participate via an online survey. All participants completed the Romanian translated SDM-Q-9.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Altogether, 665 questionnaires were filled in within the hospital setting (n = 324; 48.7%) and online (n = 341; 51.3%). The Romanian version had good internal consistency (Cronbach α coefficient of 0.96.) Corrected item correlations were good ranging from 0.64 to 0.89 with low corrected item correlations for item 1 and item 7. PCA found a one-factorial solution (similar with previous reports) but the first item had the lowest loading.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
SDM-Q-9 is a useful tool for evaluation and improvement in health care that was validated in Romania and can be used in clinical setting in this country.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30721145
doi: 10.2478/rjim-2019-0002
pii: /j/rjim.ahead-of-print/rjim-2019-0002/rjim-2019-0002.xml
doi:
pii:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM