Dose-Dependent Increases in Whole-Body Net Protein Balance and Dietary Protein-Derived Amino Acid Incorporation into Myofibrillar Protein During Recovery from Resistance Exercise in Older Men.
dietary protein
dose response
exercise
muscle protein synthesis
sarcopenia
Journal
The Journal of nutrition
ISSN: 1541-6100
Titre abrégé: J Nutr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0404243
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 02 2019
01 02 2019
Historique:
received:
18
06
2018
revised:
26
07
2018
accepted:
18
09
2018
pubmed:
6
2
2019
medline:
8
11
2019
entrez:
6
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Age-related decline in skeletal muscle mass is at least partly attributed to anabolic resistance to food intake. Resistance exercise sensitizes skeletal muscle tissue to the anabolic properties of amino acids. The present study assessed protein digestion and amino acid absorption kinetics, whole-body protein balance, and the myofibrillar protein synthetic response to ingestion of different amounts of protein during recovery from resistance exercise in older men. Forty-eight healthy older men [mean ± SEM age: 66 ± 1 y; body mass index (kg/m2): 25.4 ± 0.3] were randomly assigned to ingest 0, 15, 30, or 45 g milk protein concentrate after a single bout of resistance exercise consisting of 4 sets of 10 repetitions of leg press and leg extension and 2 sets of 10 repetitions of lateral pulldown and chest press performed at 75-80% 1-repetition maximum. Postprandial protein digestion and amino acid absorption kinetics, whole-body protein metabolism, and myofibrillar protein synthesis rates were assessed using primed, continuous infusions of l-[ring-2H5]-phenylalanine, l-[ring-2H2]-tyrosine, and l-[1-13C]-leucine combined with ingestion of intrinsically l-[1-13C]-phenylalanine and l-[1-13C]-leucine labeled protein. Whole-body net protein balance showed a dose-dependent increase after ingestion of 0, 15, 30, or 45 g of protein (0.015 ± 0.002, 0.108 ± 0.004, 0.162 ± 0.008, and 0.215 ± 0.009 μmol Phe · kg-1 · min-1, respectively; P < 0.001). Myofibrillar protein synthesis rates were higher after ingesting 30 (0.0951% ± 0.0062%/h, P = 0.07) or 45 g of protein (0.0970% ± 0.0062%/h, P < 0.05) than after 0 g (0.0746% ± 0.0051%/h). Incorporation of dietary protein-derived amino acids (l-[1-13C]-phenylalanine) into de novo myofibrillar protein showed a dose-dependent increase after ingestion of 15, 30, or 45 g protein (0.0171 ± 0.0017, 0.0296 ± 0.0030, and 0.0397 ± 0.0026 mole percentage excess, respectively; P < 0.05). Dietary protein ingested during recovery from resistance exercise is rapidly digested and absorbed. Whole-body net protein balance and dietary protein-derived amino acid incorporation into myofibrillar protein show dose-dependent increases. Ingestion of ≥30 g protein increases postexercise myofibrillar protein synthesis rates in older men. This trial was registered at Nederlands Trial Register as NTR4492.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Age-related decline in skeletal muscle mass is at least partly attributed to anabolic resistance to food intake. Resistance exercise sensitizes skeletal muscle tissue to the anabolic properties of amino acids.
OBJECTIVE
The present study assessed protein digestion and amino acid absorption kinetics, whole-body protein balance, and the myofibrillar protein synthetic response to ingestion of different amounts of protein during recovery from resistance exercise in older men.
METHODS
Forty-eight healthy older men [mean ± SEM age: 66 ± 1 y; body mass index (kg/m2): 25.4 ± 0.3] were randomly assigned to ingest 0, 15, 30, or 45 g milk protein concentrate after a single bout of resistance exercise consisting of 4 sets of 10 repetitions of leg press and leg extension and 2 sets of 10 repetitions of lateral pulldown and chest press performed at 75-80% 1-repetition maximum. Postprandial protein digestion and amino acid absorption kinetics, whole-body protein metabolism, and myofibrillar protein synthesis rates were assessed using primed, continuous infusions of l-[ring-2H5]-phenylalanine, l-[ring-2H2]-tyrosine, and l-[1-13C]-leucine combined with ingestion of intrinsically l-[1-13C]-phenylalanine and l-[1-13C]-leucine labeled protein.
RESULTS
Whole-body net protein balance showed a dose-dependent increase after ingestion of 0, 15, 30, or 45 g of protein (0.015 ± 0.002, 0.108 ± 0.004, 0.162 ± 0.008, and 0.215 ± 0.009 μmol Phe · kg-1 · min-1, respectively; P < 0.001). Myofibrillar protein synthesis rates were higher after ingesting 30 (0.0951% ± 0.0062%/h, P = 0.07) or 45 g of protein (0.0970% ± 0.0062%/h, P < 0.05) than after 0 g (0.0746% ± 0.0051%/h). Incorporation of dietary protein-derived amino acids (l-[1-13C]-phenylalanine) into de novo myofibrillar protein showed a dose-dependent increase after ingestion of 15, 30, or 45 g protein (0.0171 ± 0.0017, 0.0296 ± 0.0030, and 0.0397 ± 0.0026 mole percentage excess, respectively; P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Dietary protein ingested during recovery from resistance exercise is rapidly digested and absorbed. Whole-body net protein balance and dietary protein-derived amino acid incorporation into myofibrillar protein show dose-dependent increases. Ingestion of ≥30 g protein increases postexercise myofibrillar protein synthesis rates in older men. This trial was registered at Nederlands Trial Register as NTR4492.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30722014
pii: S0022-3166(22)16540-5
doi: 10.1093/jn/nxy263
pmc: PMC6374151
doi:
Substances chimiques
Amino Acids
0
Dietary Proteins
0
Muscle Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
221-230Informations de copyright
© American Society for Nutrition 2019.
Références
Clin Nutr. 2017 Apr;36(2):429-437
pubmed: 26774526
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2013 Feb;38(2):120-5
pubmed: 23438221
Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2013 Jul;41(3):169-73
pubmed: 23558692
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2006 Aug;291(2):E381-7
pubmed: 16507602
Am J Physiol. 1996 Dec;271(6 Pt 1):E1083-91
pubmed: 8997229
Diabetes. 2003 Jun;52(6):1377-85
pubmed: 12765947
Front Physiol. 2012 Jul 11;3:260
pubmed: 22934016
Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Nov;96(5):1064-70
pubmed: 23034966
Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Jan;89(1):161-8
pubmed: 19056590
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1995 Jun;35(2):108-13
pubmed: 7500624
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Oct;92(10):4812-22
pubmed: 19762796
Ageing Res Rev. 2013 Sep;12(4):898-906
pubmed: 23948422
Eur J Nutr. 2012 Mar;51(2):173-9
pubmed: 21562887
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Jan 1;308(1):E21-8
pubmed: 25352437
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 04;10(11):e0140903
pubmed: 26536130
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Mar;286(3):E321-8
pubmed: 14583440
Am J Clin Nutr. 2011 Feb;93(2):322-31
pubmed: 21084649
Am J Clin Nutr. 2015 Oct;102(4):828-36
pubmed: 26354539
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015 Jan;70(1):57-62
pubmed: 25056502
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Jun;99(6):2250-8
pubmed: 24628553
Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 Nov;82(5):1065-73
pubmed: 16280440
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Aug;44(8):1560-9
pubmed: 22330017
Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 Dec;106(6):1401-1412
pubmed: 28978542
Nutr Metab (Lond). 2012 Jun 14;9(1):57
pubmed: 22698458
Am J Physiol. 1997 Jul;273(1 Pt 1):E99-107
pubmed: 9252485
Nutrients. 2015 Nov 25;7(12):9697-706
pubmed: 26610565
Sports Med. 2016 Sep;46(9):1205-12
pubmed: 26894275
Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Jan;99(1):86-95
pubmed: 24257722
J Nutr. 2016 Jul;146(7):1307-14
pubmed: 27281811
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Jan;41(1):144-54
pubmed: 19092695
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Oct;295(4):E921-8
pubmed: 18697911
Clin Nutr. 2013 Apr;32(2):309-13
pubmed: 23260197
J Physiol. 2009 Feb 15;587(Pt 4):897-904
pubmed: 19124543
J Nutr. 2016 Sep;146(9):1651-9
pubmed: 27440260
Diabetes. 2015 Sep;64(9):3160-71
pubmed: 26015550
Mech Ageing Dev. 1999 Mar 1;107(2):123-36
pubmed: 10220041
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 10;10(11):e0141582
pubmed: 26556791
J Nutr. 2018 Jun 1;148(6):900-909
pubmed: 29796648
Br J Nutr. 2012 Nov 28;108(10):1780-8
pubmed: 22313809
J Nutr. 2003 Sep;133(9):2953S-61S
pubmed: 12949393
FASEB J. 2005 Mar;19(3):422-4
pubmed: 15596483
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Apr 15;302(8):E992-9
pubmed: 22338070
Diabetes Care. 2003 Nov;26(11):3160-7
pubmed: 14578255
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2014 Dec 1;117(11):1363-70
pubmed: 25277738
J Physiol. 2003 Jun 1;549(Pt 2):635-44
pubmed: 12665610
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Jan 1;310(1):E73-80
pubmed: 26530155
Am J Physiol. 1995 Mar;268(3 Pt 1):E514-20
pubmed: 7900797