Side Effects of Kaolin and Bunch-Zone Leaf Removal on Predatory Mite Populations (Acari: Phytoseiidae) Occurring in Vineyards.

Kampimodromus aberrans Typhlodromus pyri cultural practice grapevine natural enemy

Journal

Journal of economic entomology
ISSN: 1938-291X
Titre abrégé: J Econ Entomol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985127R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 05 2019
Historique:
received: 07 11 2018
pubmed: 6 2 2019
medline: 18 12 2019
entrez: 6 2 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The effects of kaolin and bunch-zone leaf removal on populations of predatory mites Kampimodromus aberrans (Oudemans) and Typhlodromus pyri Scheuten were assessed in the context of four trials (2015-2016) carried out against Lobesia botrana (Denis and Schiffermüller) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in vineyards located in north-eastern Italy. Laboratory experiments were performed to evaluate the effects of kaolin on the survival and fecundity of K. aberrans and T. pyri populations originating from the same grape-growing area. In field trials, kaolin caused a gradual decrease in population density levels of both phytoseiid species (with the maximum reduction ranging from 49 to 91%) with a complete population recovery in the next spring. In laboratory experiments, kaolin was moderately harmful to both species, reducing their fecundity significantly (around 60%). Bunch-zone leaf removal determined lower phytoseiid populations in all trials, but this effect was significant only for K. aberrans in one of them. A limited use of kaolin and the adoption of bunch-zone leaf removal did not irreversibly affect phytoseiid populations in vineyards and thus can be considered compatible with IPM strategies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30722064
pii: 5306474
doi: 10.1093/jee/toy431
doi:

Substances chimiques

Kaolin 24H4NWX5CO

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1292-1298

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Federico Tacoli (F)

Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences (DI4A), University of Udine, Udine, Italy.

Elena Cargnus (E)

Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences (DI4A), University of Udine, Udine, Italy.

Alberto Pozzebon (A)

Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals, Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Legnaro, Padova, Italy.

Carlo Duso (C)

Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals, Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Legnaro, Padova, Italy.

Paola Tirello (P)

Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals, Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Legnaro, Padova, Italy.

Francesco Pavan (F)

Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences (DI4A), University of Udine, Udine, Italy.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH