Ethnobotanical uses in the Ancona district (Marche region, Central Italy).
Ethnobotany
Italy
Marche region
Traditional local knowledge
Wild plant uses
Journal
Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine
ISSN: 1746-4269
Titre abrégé: J Ethnobiol Ethnomed
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245794
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Feb 2019
05 Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
27
07
2018
accepted:
21
01
2019
entrez:
7
2
2019
pubmed:
7
2
2019
medline:
31
5
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The study is a survey of the traditional uses of plants in the Ancona district, in the Marche region, Central Italy. The information derives from ethnobotanical investigations conducted with an open questionnaire among the rural population in three areas of the Ancona district that are representative of the socio-economic and environmental assets of the entire district: the Mount Conero area on the Adriatic coast; the municipality of Osimo, as an inland hilly area; and the 'Gola della Rossa-Frasassi' area, in the Apennines. A total of 120 informants cited 195 species. The ethnobotanical data concern medicinal (122 species), food (119), veterinary (53), superstitious/religious (61), cosmetic (30), domestic (27), dyeing (17), recreational (17), repellent (15), craft (10), and miscellaneous (29) uses, along with inclusion in local sayings and proverbs (25). The species with the greatest number of categories of use here was Sambucus nigra L. Among the other species with the greatest numbers of categories of use, there were Matricharia chamomilla L., Salvia officinalis L., Urtica dioica L., Papaver roheas L., and Rosa canina L. For each use, comparisons with national and regional literature were made. Some uses are commonly known across the three areas; others are sectoral and are new for the Marche region. The survey increases our present-day knowledge of the traditional local uses of plants in the Marche region, in terms of medicinal and food uses, and of ethnobotanical aspects as a whole, which will allow many of these uses to be preserved in the future.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The study is a survey of the traditional uses of plants in the Ancona district, in the Marche region, Central Italy.
METHODS
METHODS
The information derives from ethnobotanical investigations conducted with an open questionnaire among the rural population in three areas of the Ancona district that are representative of the socio-economic and environmental assets of the entire district: the Mount Conero area on the Adriatic coast; the municipality of Osimo, as an inland hilly area; and the 'Gola della Rossa-Frasassi' area, in the Apennines.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 120 informants cited 195 species. The ethnobotanical data concern medicinal (122 species), food (119), veterinary (53), superstitious/religious (61), cosmetic (30), domestic (27), dyeing (17), recreational (17), repellent (15), craft (10), and miscellaneous (29) uses, along with inclusion in local sayings and proverbs (25). The species with the greatest number of categories of use here was Sambucus nigra L. Among the other species with the greatest numbers of categories of use, there were Matricharia chamomilla L., Salvia officinalis L., Urtica dioica L., Papaver roheas L., and Rosa canina L. For each use, comparisons with national and regional literature were made.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Some uses are commonly known across the three areas; others are sectoral and are new for the Marche region. The survey increases our present-day knowledge of the traditional local uses of plants in the Marche region, in terms of medicinal and food uses, and of ethnobotanical aspects as a whole, which will allow many of these uses to be preserved in the future.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30722788
doi: 10.1186/s13002-019-0288-1
pii: 10.1186/s13002-019-0288-1
pmc: PMC6364442
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
9Références
Fitoterapia. 2003 Sep;74(6):515-44
pubmed: 12946715
J Ethnopharmacol. 2004 Apr;91(2-3):331-44
pubmed: 15120458
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Apr 29;359(1444):681-7
pubmed: 15253353
J Ethnopharmacol. 2005 Jan 15;96(3):429-44
pubmed: 15619562
Fitoterapia. 2005 Jan;76(1):1-25
pubmed: 15664457
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2006 Mar 24;2:16
pubmed: 16563158
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2007 Mar 30;3:15
pubmed: 17397527
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2007 May 04;3:22
pubmed: 17480214
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2007 May 30;3:23
pubmed: 17537240
Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2008 Aug;59(5):383-414
pubmed: 18979618
J Ethnopharmacol. 2009 Aug 17;125(1):16-30
pubmed: 19563876
J Ethnopharmacol. 2013 Apr 19;146(3):659-80
pubmed: 23395624
J Ethnopharmacol. 2014 Sep 11;155(2):1362-81
pubmed: 25077465
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2014 Sep 25;10:69
pubmed: 25258146
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2016 Feb 09;12:12
pubmed: 26860327
J Ethnopharmacol. 2016 Jun 5;185:202-34
pubmed: 26944238
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2017 Sep 6;13(1):50
pubmed: 28874202