Clinical effectiveness of a sonographer-led, cardiologist-interpreted stress echocardiography service in the rapid access stable chest pain clinic.
Aged
Cardiologists
/ standards
Chest Pain
/ diagnostic imaging
Coronary Angiography
/ methods
Coronary Artery Disease
/ diagnostic imaging
Echocardiography, Stress
/ methods
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Retrospective Studies
Technology, Radiologic
/ methods
Treatment Outcome
Coronary artery disease
Echocardiography
Health care delivery
Health care economics
Quality and outcome of care
Journal
International journal of cardiology
ISSN: 1874-1754
Titre abrégé: Int J Cardiol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8200291
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Apr 2019
15 Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
09
10
2018
revised:
06
01
2019
accepted:
22
01
2019
pubmed:
7
2
2019
medline:
25
12
2019
entrez:
7
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess the clinical effectiveness of a sonographer-led, cardiologist-interpreted stress echocardiography (SE) service in a rapid access stable chest pain clinic (RACPC) setting. Baseline data was collected prospectively on 768 consecutive patients, referred from the RACPC, who underwent SE between May 2014 and May 2015. Retrospective analysis was performed on follow-up data for outcomes. Among 768 patients (mean age 58 years, 57.8% males) with a mean pre-test probability of coronary artery disease (CAD) of 31%, 675 (88%) underwent SE on the same day as the RACPC consultation. Diagnostic tests were obtained in 749 (97.5%) cases with 62 (8.1%) demonstrating inducible ischemia. Coronary angiography was performed in 61 patients of whom 54 demonstrated flow-limiting CAD (positive predictive value: 88.5%). There was no occurrence of serious adverse events. During a mean follow-up period of 2.5 years, 20 first cardiac events were recorded, of which annualised events in the normal SE group were 0.64% versus 5.8% in patients with an abnormal SE (log rank p < 0.001). Sonographer-led SE interpreted by a cardiologist is feasible, safe and efficacious. It impacted on the management of patients with appropriate outcomes and may be a cost-efficient and safer alternative to other non-invasive imaging modalities in the RACPC setting.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30722958
pii: S0167-5273(18)35918-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.01.080
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
107-112Informations de copyright
Crown Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.