Measurement of Flexion Angle of the Finger Joint during Cylinder Gripping Using a Three-Dimensional Bone Model Built by X-Ray Computed Tomography.


Journal

Applied bionics and biomechanics
ISSN: 1176-2322
Titre abrégé: Appl Bionics Biomech
Pays: Egypt
ID NLM: 101208624

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 20 08 2018
accepted: 04 12 2018
entrez: 7 2 2019
pubmed: 7 2 2019
medline: 7 2 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Motion analysis of the thumb and the four fingers during human gripping of a cylindrical object is a prerequisite for designing motion mechanisms in electronic arm prostheses and robotic hands. Conventional measurement methods include the use of angle sensors or multiple video recording of markers. In the present study, we performed X-ray computed tomography (CT) imaging on fingers gripping cylinders of three different diameters (10, 60, and 120 mm) and constructed a bone model based on these CT images to directly measure the flexion angle of each finger joint. We then compared the results with the flexion angles of joints measured using other methods. The subjects comprised 10 Japanese men with no hand injuries or diseases. Our results showed that smaller cylinder diameters were associated with significant increases in the flexion angle of all the joints of the four fingers. When focusing on the distal interphalangeal joint (DIP), there was no significant difference between any of the fingers for each of the cylinders, except between the index and middle fingers for the 10 mm-diameter cylinder. When focusing on the 10 mm-diameter cylinder, the flexion angle of the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) of each finger was significantly larger than that of the DIP and metacarpophalangeal joint (MP). However, no such significant difference was noted for the 120 mm-diameter cylinder. The coupling ratio (CR), which is the ratio of the flexion angles of the DIP and PIP, was significantly smaller for the 10 mm-diameter cylinder than for the 60 mm-diameter cylinder. However, there were no significant differences in CR between any of the fingers. A comparison of our study results with those derived using other methods indicated quantitative consistency for the DIP and PIP. However, for the MP, we noted differences that may be explained by the difficulty in determining the longitudinal axis of the metacarpal using other methods.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30723529
doi: 10.1155/2019/2839648
pmc: PMC6339738
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2839648

Références

J Hand Surg Br. 2000 Apr;25(2):195-9
pubmed: 11062582
J Neurosci. 2000 Nov 15;20(22):8542-50
pubmed: 11069962
J Neurosci. 2002 Feb 15;22(4):1426-35
pubmed: 11850469
Surg Radiol Anat. 2003 May;25(2):105-12
pubmed: 12756500
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1956 Nov;38-B(4):902-13
pubmed: 13376678
Ann Rheum Dis. 1962 Jun;21:164-70
pubmed: 14461996
Hum Mov Sci. 2004 Apr;22(6):661-78
pubmed: 15063047
J Biomech. 2005 May;38(5):981-992
pubmed: 15844264
J Hand Surg Am. 2010 May;35(5):797-806
pubmed: 20189730
J Biomed Eng. 1991 Mar;13(2):152-62
pubmed: 2033951
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:3044-7
pubmed: 23366567
Saf Health Work. 2015 Mar;6(1):9-17
pubmed: 25830064
Ergonomics. 2016 Jul;59(7):890-900
pubmed: 26472250
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1988 Feb;35(2):110-7
pubmed: 3350537
J Hand Surg Br. 1998 Dec;23(6):788-91
pubmed: 9888683

Auteurs

Satoshi Shimawaki (S)

Department of Mechanical and Intelligent Engineering, Utsunomiya University, 7-1-2 Yoto, Utsunomiya, 321-8585 Tochigi, Japan.

Takuma Murai (T)

Department of Mechanical and Intelligent Engineering, Utsunomiya University, 7-1-2 Yoto, Utsunomiya, 321-8585 Tochigi, Japan.

Masataka Nakabayashi (M)

Department of Mechanical and Intelligent Engineering, Utsunomiya University, 7-1-2 Yoto, Utsunomiya, 321-8585 Tochigi, Japan.

Hideharu Sugimoto (H)

Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Jichi Medical University and Hospital, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, 329-0498 Tochigi, Japan.

Classifications MeSH