Variations in the Clinical Course of Patients with Herpes Simplex Virus Esophagitis Based on Immunocompetence and Presence of Underlying Esophageal Disease.
Adult
Aged
Antiviral Agents
/ therapeutic use
Biopsy
Candidiasis
/ immunology
Databases, Factual
Deglutition
Deglutition Disorders
/ diagnosis
Esophagitis
/ diagnosis
Esophagoscopy
Esophagus
/ immunology
Female
Herpes Simplex
/ diagnosis
Humans
Immunocompetence
Immunocompromised Host
Male
Middle Aged
Opportunistic Infections
/ diagnosis
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Endoscopy
Esophagitis
HSV
Immunodeficiency
Journal
Digestive diseases and sciences
ISSN: 1573-2568
Titre abrégé: Dig Dis Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7902782
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2019
07 2019
Historique:
received:
19
11
2018
accepted:
24
01
2019
pubmed:
7
2
2019
medline:
24
12
2019
entrez:
7
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Herpes simplex esophagitis (HSE) is the second most common cause of infectious esophagitis and occurs in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. The aim of this study was to reappraise the clinical course of HSE in different patient populations based on degree of immunocompetence and the presence or absence of underlying esophageal disease. Patients with histopathologically confirmed HSE identified from the Mayo Clinic pathology database from 2006 to 2016 were included in this study. Relevant demographic, clinical, and endoscopic data were retrospectively reviewed and compared between two cohorts: (a) immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients and (b) patients with and without underlying esophageal disorders. Forty-six patients were included in the study. The most common presenting symptoms were odynophagia (34.8%) and dysphagia (30.4%). Thirty-three (71.7%) patients were immunocompromised, and these patients who experienced longer duration of symptoms (25.5 ± 23.4 days vs. 7.0 ± 5.5 days, p = 0.04) were more likely to require an extension of treatment course (38.1% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.05) compared to their immunocompetent counterparts. Seventeen (37%) patients had underlying esophageal disease, and these patients were more likely to have concomitant esophageal candidiasis (41.2% vs. 10.3%, respectively; p = 0.01). Herpes simplex virus causes esophagitis in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. While the disease course appears to be self-limited for all patient populations, clinical and endoscopic differences in the disease presentation and clinical course based on immune status and the presence or absence of underlying esophageal disease exist.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Herpes simplex esophagitis (HSE) is the second most common cause of infectious esophagitis and occurs in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. The aim of this study was to reappraise the clinical course of HSE in different patient populations based on degree of immunocompetence and the presence or absence of underlying esophageal disease.
METHODS
Patients with histopathologically confirmed HSE identified from the Mayo Clinic pathology database from 2006 to 2016 were included in this study. Relevant demographic, clinical, and endoscopic data were retrospectively reviewed and compared between two cohorts: (a) immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients and (b) patients with and without underlying esophageal disorders.
RESULTS
Forty-six patients were included in the study. The most common presenting symptoms were odynophagia (34.8%) and dysphagia (30.4%). Thirty-three (71.7%) patients were immunocompromised, and these patients who experienced longer duration of symptoms (25.5 ± 23.4 days vs. 7.0 ± 5.5 days, p = 0.04) were more likely to require an extension of treatment course (38.1% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.05) compared to their immunocompetent counterparts. Seventeen (37%) patients had underlying esophageal disease, and these patients were more likely to have concomitant esophageal candidiasis (41.2% vs. 10.3%, respectively; p = 0.01).
CONCLUSION
Herpes simplex virus causes esophagitis in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. While the disease course appears to be self-limited for all patient populations, clinical and endoscopic differences in the disease presentation and clinical course based on immune status and the presence or absence of underlying esophageal disease exist.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30725296
doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05493-x
pii: 10.1007/s10620-019-05493-x
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antiviral Agents
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1893-1900Références
Stanberry LR, Jorgensen DM, Nahmias AJ. Herpes simplex viruses 1 and 2. In: Evans AS, Kaslow R, eds. Viral Infections of Humans: Epidemiology and Control. 4th ed. New York: Plenum Publishers; 1997:419–454.
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-0036-4_14
Canalejo E, García Durán F, Cabello N, García Martínez J. Herpes esophagitis in healthy adults and adolescents. Medicine (Baltimore). 2010;89:204–210. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0b013e3181e949ed .
doi: 10.1097/MD.0b013e3181e949ed
McBane RD, Gross JB. Herpes esophagitis: clinical syndrome, endoscopic appearance, and diagnosis in 23 patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;37:600–603.
doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(91)70862-6
McDonald GB, Sharma P, Hackman RC, Meyers JD, Thomas ED. Esophageal infections in immunosuppressed patients after marrow transplantation. Gastroenterology. 1985;88:1111–1117.
doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(85)80068-8
pubmed: 2984077
Hoversten P, Kamboj AK, Katzka DA. Infections of the esophagus: an update on risk factors, diagnosis, and management. Dis Esophagus. 2018;. https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doy094 .
doi: 10.1093/dote/doy094
pubmed: 30295751
Généreau T, Rozenberg F, Bouchaud O, Marche C, Lortholary O. Herpes esophagitis: a comprehensive review. Clin Microbiol Infect. 1997;3:397–407.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.1997.tb00275.x
pubmed: 11864149
Wang H-W, Kuo C-J, Lin W-R, et al. Clinical characteristics and manifestation of herpes esophagitis: one single-center experience in Taiwan. Medicine. 2016;95:e3187. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000003187 .
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003187
pubmed: 27057845
pmcid: 4998761
Hoversten P, Otaki F, Katzka DA. Course of Esophageal Candidiasis and Outcomes of Patients at a Single Center. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2018.04.035 .
doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.04.035
pubmed: 29702297
Lee SP, Sung I-K, Kim JH, Lee S-Y, Park HS, Shim CS. The clinical course of asymptomatic esophageal candidiasis incidentally diagnosed in general health inspection. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015;50(12):1444–1450. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365521.2015.1057519 .
doi: 10.3109/00365521.2015.1057519
pubmed: 26083902
Rosołowski M, Kierzkiewicz M. Etiology, diagnosis and treatment of infectious esophagitis. Prz Gastroenterol. 2013;8:333–337. https://doi.org/10.5114/pg.2013.39914 .
doi: 10.5114/pg.2013.39914
pubmed: 24868280
pmcid: 4027832
Agha FP, Lee HH, Nostrant TT. Herpetic esophagitis: a diagnostic challenge in immunocompromised patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 1986;81:246–253.
pubmed: 3962949
Kondo T, Terada K. Candida esophagitis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1574. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMicm1614893 .
doi: 10.1056/NEJMicm1614893
pubmed: 28423304