Second malignant neoplasm risk after craniospinal irradiation in X-ray-based techniques compared to proton therapy.


Journal

Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine
ISSN: 1879-5447
Titre abrégé: Australas Phys Eng Sci Med
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8208130

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Historique:
received: 11 07 2018
accepted: 24 01 2019
pubmed: 7 2 2019
medline: 18 7 2019
entrez: 7 2 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Cranio-spinal irradiation (CSI) is widely used for treating medulloblastoma cases in children. Radiation-induced second malignancy is of grave concern; especially in children due to their long-life expectancy and higher radiosensitivity of tissues at young age. Several techniques can be employed for CSI including 3DCRT, IMRT, VMAT and tomotherapy. However, these techniques are associated with higher risk of second malignancy due to the physical characteristics of photon irradiation which deliver moderately higher doses to normal tissues. On the other hand, proton beam therapy delivers substantially lesser dose to normal tissues due to the sharp dose fall off beyond Bragg peak compared to photon therapy. The aim of this work is to quantify the relative decrease in the risk with proton therapy compared to other photon treatments for CSI. Ten anonymized patient DICOM datasets treated previously were selected for this study. 3DCRT, IMRT, VMAT, tomotherapy and proton therapy with pencil beam scanning (PBS) plans were generated. The prescription dose was 36 Gy in 20 fractions. PBS was chosen due to substantially lesser neutron dose compared to passive scattering. The age of the patients ranged from 3 to 12 with a median age of eight with six male and four female patients. Commonly used linear and a mechanistic doseresponse models (DRM) were used for the analyses. Dose-volume histograms (DVH) were calculated for critical structures to calculate organ equivalent doses (OED) to obtain excess absolute risk (EAR), life-time attributable risk (LAR) and other risk relevant parameters. A α' value of 0.018 Gy

Identifiants

pubmed: 30725439
doi: 10.1007/s13246-019-00731-y
pii: 10.1007/s13246-019-00731-y
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

201-209

Auteurs

Vasanthan Sakthivel (V)

Advanced Medical Physics, Houston, USA.
Research and Development Centre, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, India.

Kadirampatti M Ganesh (KM)

Research and Development Centre, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, India.
Department of Radiation Physics, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, India.

Craig McKenzie (C)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, USA.
RaySearch Laboratories, New York, USA.

Raghavendiran Boopathy (R)

Advanced Medical Physics, Houston, USA.

Jothybasu Selvaraj (J)

Medical Physics & Radiation Engineering, Canberra Hospital, Garran, ACT, Australia. Jothy.Selvaraj@act.gov.au.
South West Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. Jothy.Selvaraj@act.gov.au.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH