Durable Tumor Regression and Overall Survival in Patients With Advanced Merkel Cell Carcinoma Receiving Pembrolizumab as First-Line Therapy.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
/ adverse effects
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
/ adverse effects
B7-H1 Antigen
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Carcinoma, Merkel Cell
/ drug therapy
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Hypothyroidism
/ chemically induced
Male
Middle Aged
Pneumonia
/ chemically induced
Progression-Free Survival
Remission Induction
Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
Skin Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Journal
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
ISSN: 1527-7755
Titre abrégé: J Clin Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309333
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 03 2019
20 03 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
7
2
2019
medline:
25
2
2020
entrez:
7
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive skin cancer often caused by the Merkel cell polyomavirus. Clinical trials of programmed cell death-1 pathway inhibitors for advanced MCC (aMCC) demonstrate increased progression-free survival (PFS) compared with historical chemotherapy data. However, response durability and overall survival (OS) data are limited. In this multicenter phase II trial (Cancer Immunotherapy Trials Network-09/Keynote-017), 50 adults naïve to systemic therapy for aMCC received pembrolizumab (2 mg/kg every 3 weeks) for up to 2 years. Radiographic responses were assessed centrally per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. Among 50 patients, the median age was 70.5 years, and 64% had Merkel cell polyomavirus-positive tumors. The objective response rate (ORR) to pembrolizumab was 56% (complete response [24%] plus partial response [32%]; 95% CI, 41.3% to 70.0%), with ORRs of 59% in virus-positive and 53% in virus-negative tumors. Median follow-up time was 14.9 months (range, 0.4 to 36.4+ months). Among 28 responders, median response duration was not reached (range, 5.9 to 34.5+ months). The 24-month PFS rate was 48.3%, and median PFS time was 16.8 months (95% CI, 4.6 months to not estimable). The 24-month OS rate was 68.7%, and median OS time was not reached. Although tumor viral status did not correlate with ORR, PFS, or OS, there was a trend toward improved PFS and OS in patients with programmed death ligand-1-positive tumors. Grade 3 or greater treatment-related adverse events occurred in 14 (28%) of 50 patients and led to treatment discontinuation in seven (14%) of 50 patients, including one treatment-related death. Here, we present the longest observation to date of patients with aMCC receiving first-line anti-programmed cell death-1 therapy. Pembrolizumab demonstrated durable tumor control, a generally manageable safety profile, and favorable OS compared with historical data from patients treated with first-line chemotherapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30726175
doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01896
pmc: PMC6424137
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
B7-H1 Antigen
0
CD274 protein, human
0
pembrolizumab
DPT0O3T46P
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02267603']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
693-702Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : K08 CA191063
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : T32 CA193145
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UM1 CA154967
Pays : United States
Références
Cancer Immunol Res. 2013 Jul;1(1):54-63
pubmed: 24416729
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Sep 1;4(9):e180077
pubmed: 29566106
Science. 2008 Feb 22;319(5866):1096-100
pubmed: 18202256
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Oct;17(10):1374-1385
pubmed: 27592805
Int Immunopharmacol. 2018 May;58:125-135
pubmed: 29579717
Oncotarget. 2016 Jan 19;7(3):3403-15
pubmed: 26655088
J Invest Dermatol. 2017 Apr;137(4):819-827
pubmed: 27815175
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;35(34):3867-3876
pubmed: 29053400
J Invest Dermatol. 2013 Jul;133(7):1879-89
pubmed: 23419694
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 30;374(26):2542-52
pubmed: 27093365
Future Oncol. 2017 Aug;13(19):1699-1710
pubmed: 28605939
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 Jun;16(6):742-774
pubmed: 29891526
Control Clin Trials. 1989 Mar;10(1):1-10
pubmed: 2702835
Int J Cancer. 2009 Sep 15;125(6):1243-9
pubmed: 19499546
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Mar;35(7):785-792
pubmed: 28068177
Lancet. 2002 Feb 9;359(9305):497-8
pubmed: 11853800
Cancer Med. 2016 Sep;5(9):2294-301
pubmed: 27431483
JAMA. 2017 Nov 7;318(17):1647-1648
pubmed: 28885639
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Mar;78(3):457-463.e2
pubmed: 29102486
Cancer Res. 2015 Dec 15;75(24):5228-34
pubmed: 26627015
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017 Oct 26;3:17077
pubmed: 29072302
Cancer Res. 2015 Sep 15;75(18):3720-3727
pubmed: 26238782
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014 Oct 15;7(11):7610-21
pubmed: 25550797
J Immunother Cancer. 2018 Jan 19;6(1):7
pubmed: 29347993
J Immunother Cancer. 2018 Oct 1;6(1):99
pubmed: 30285852
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(11):3564-3571
pubmed: 27198511
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Aug 01;3(8):1051-1058
pubmed: 28278348
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008 Mar;58(3):375-81
pubmed: 18280333
Cancer Res. 2010 Nov 1;70(21):8388-97
pubmed: 20959478
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Aug 1;38(22):2476-2487
pubmed: 32324435