Second Trimester Biochemical Markers as Possible Predictors of Pathological Placentation: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.
Placenta accreta
Placenta previa
Second trimester screening markers
Journal
Fetal diagnosis and therapy
ISSN: 1421-9964
Titre abrégé: Fetal Diagn Ther
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 9107463
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
12
01
2018
accepted:
06
08
2018
pubmed:
7
2
2019
medline:
14
2
2020
entrez:
7
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We aimed to evaluate the association between second trimester biochemical markers and pathological placentation. This was a retrospective case-control study (2007-2014) of singleton gestations at a university-affiliated tertiary center. Women with pathologic placentation were subdivided into three groups: placenta accreta (group A), placenta previa (group B), or both (group C). We compared second trimester biochemical screening markers taken between 16 + 0 and 19 + 6 weeks of gestation between groups A, B, and C, and women with normal placentation (group D). Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes, risk factors for pathologic placentation, and second trimester biochemical marker values were compared between groups. Overall, 301 deliveries were evaluated: 64 (21%) in group A, 66 (22%) in group B, 17 (6%) in group C, and 153 (51%) in group D. Each of the pathological placentation groups individually had a higher median alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) multiples of median (MoM) than the controls, with the highest values of AFP and hCG observed among women with placenta accreta and the lowest values among the controls. When a multivariant analysis was applied, the hCG levels remained significantly correlated with pathological placentation. Receiver operation characteristic curves for AFP, hCG, or both were computed. For AFP the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.573 (95% CI 0.515-0.630, p < 0.0274) and a cut-off value above 0.99 MoM demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 71 and 46%, respectively, for the prediction of pathological placentation. For hCG, the AUC was 0.662 (95% CI 0.605-0.715, p < 0.0001) and a cut-off value of 1.25 MoM demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 53 and 68%. When both markers were plotted, the AUC was 0.668 (95% CI 0.611-0.721, p < 0.0001) and sensitivity and specificity were 63 and 64%, respectively. A percentile MoM cut-off approach distinguished between two groups: a high-risk group (patients with AFP or hCG or both above the 75th percentile, odds ratio (OR) for pathological placentation 2.27, 95% CI 1.42-3.63), and a low-risk group (patients with AFP or hCG or both below the 25th percentile, OR for pathological placentation 0.38, 95% CI 0.24-0.60). Second trimester biomarkers such as hCG and AFP can be used to raise a suspicion towards characterizing women into high-risk and low-risk groups for pathological placentation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30726846
pii: 000492829
doi: 10.1159/000492829
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human
0
alpha-Fetoproteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
187-192Informations de copyright
© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel.