Baseline PI susceptibility by HIV-1 Gag-protease phenotyping and subsequent virological suppression with PI-based second-line ART in Nigeria.
Adult
CD4 Lymphocyte Count
Clinical Trials as Topic
Female
HEK293 Cells
HIV Infections
/ blood
HIV Protease
/ blood
HIV Protease Inhibitors
/ pharmacology
HIV-1
/ drug effects
Humans
Inhibitory Concentration 50
Kidney
/ cytology
Middle Aged
Nigeria
Phenotype
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Failure
Treatment Outcome
Viral Load
/ drug effects
Journal
The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy
ISSN: 1460-2091
Titre abrégé: J Antimicrob Chemother
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7513617
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 05 2019
01 05 2019
Historique:
received:
07
10
2018
revised:
14
12
2018
accepted:
31
12
2018
pubmed:
7
2
2019
medline:
30
7
2020
entrez:
7
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Previous work showed that gag-protease-derived phenotypic susceptibility to PIs differed between HIV-1 subtype CRF02_AG/subtype G-infected patients who went on to successfully suppress viral replication versus those who experienced virological failure of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy as first-line treatment in a clinical trial. We analysed the relationship between PI susceptibility and outcome of second-line ART in Nigeria, where subtypes CRF02_AG/G dominate the epidemic. Individuals who experienced second-line failure with ritonavir-boosted PI-based ART were matched (by subtype, sex, age, viral load, duration of treatment and baseline CD4 count) to those who achieved virological response ('successes'). Successes were defined by viral load <400 copies of HIV-1 RNA/mL by week 48. Full-length Gag-protease was amplified from patient samples for in vitro phenotypic susceptibility testing, with PI susceptibility expressed as IC50 fold change (FC) relative to a subtype B reference strain. The median (IQR) lopinavir IC50 FC was 4.04 (2.49-7.89) for virological failures and 4.13 (3.14-8.17) for virological successes (P = 0.94). One patient had an FC >10 for lopinavir at baseline and experienced subsequent virological failure with ritonavir-boosted lopinavir as the PI. There was no statistically significant difference in single-round replication efficiency between the two groups (P = 0.93). There was a moderate correlation between single-round replication efficiency and FC for lopinavir (correlation coefficient 0.32). We found no impact of baseline HIV-1 Gag-protease-derived phenotypic susceptibility on outcomes of PI-based second-line ART in Nigeria.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30726945
pii: 5306598
doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz005
pmc: PMC6477990
doi:
Substances chimiques
HIV Protease Inhibitors
0
HIV Protease
EC 3.4.23.-
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1402-1407Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.
Références
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Nov 1;61(9):1453-61
pubmed: 26157050
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Dec;69(12):3340-8
pubmed: 25096075
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009 Nov 1;52(3):320-8
pubmed: 19727001
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Mar;18(3):346-355
pubmed: 29198909
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Jan 1;74(1):172-176
pubmed: 30260417
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Dec;30(12):2725-9
pubmed: 24132122
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2015 Aug;31(8):776-82
pubmed: 25919760
J Infect Dis. 2013 Jun 15;207 Suppl 2:S49-56
pubmed: 23687289
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Apr 15;64(8):1006-1016
pubmed: 28329393
J Virol. 1996 Jun;70(6):3763-9
pubmed: 8648711
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Mar 25;60(4):2248-56
pubmed: 26833162
Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 30;6:38153
pubmed: 27901085
J Clin Invest. 2013 Sep;123(9):3848-60
pubmed: 23979165
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 17;8(9):e73582
pubmed: 24069209
AIDS. 2010 Jul 17;24(11):1651-5
pubmed: 20597164
Retrovirology. 2012 Aug 06;9:63
pubmed: 22867298
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2015 Oct;31(10):1032-7
pubmed: 26258548
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 Jan;70(1):243-8
pubmed: 25228587
Retrovirology. 2014 Sep 25;11:79
pubmed: 25253273
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Mar;17(3):296-304
pubmed: 27914856
AIDS. 2012 May 15;26(8):929-38
pubmed: 22313953
J Virol. 2009 Sep;83(18):9094-101
pubmed: 19587031
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Jun 1;66(12):1846-1857
pubmed: 29272346
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 May;16(5):565-575
pubmed: 26831472
J Gen Virol. 2014 Jan;95(Pt 1):190-200
pubmed: 24172906
PLoS Med. 2007 Jan;4(1):e36
pubmed: 17227139
J Int AIDS Soc. 2017 Nov;20(3):
pubmed: 29098809