Using 19% of alfalfa hay in beef feedlot finishing diets did not modify meat quality but increased feed intake and ADG1.
beef cattle
forage source
meat quality
performance
Journal
Journal of animal science
ISSN: 1525-3163
Titre abrégé: J Anim Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003002
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Apr 2019
29 Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
09
10
2018
accepted:
28
01
2019
pubmed:
7
2
2019
medline:
5
9
2019
entrez:
7
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the effects of including extra alfalfa hay (AH) in high-concentrate diets fed to beef heifers on intake, ADG, G:F, and carcass and meat quality, we used 24 Simmental heifers (initial BW 235.6 ± 4.19 kg). Heifers were blocked in four BW blocks and allotted in groups of 3 in a randomized block design with 2 treatments and 12 heifers per treatment. Treatment diets offered as total mixed ration (TMR) were (i) TMR with 10% barley straw (BS), considered the control diet, and (ii) TMR with 19% AH. The experiment was performed over four 28-d experimental periods, and we took measurements in the last week of each period. After this period of performance control, heifers were fed the corresponding diet until each BW block reached the target weight of 400 kg on average. Feed intake and ADG were greater for AH than BS (9.5 vs. 8.4 kg/d, and 1.45 vs. 1.29 kg/d, respectively; P < 0.05), but G:F was unaffected by diet (P > 0.10). Diet did not affect HCW, dressing percentage, backfat color, pH and meat color, or carcass grade. The sixth rib was dissected to determine the proportion of fat, lean, and bone, which were unaffected by diet. Diet did not affect the LM composition in water, protein, collagen, intramuscular fat, and cholesterol. The intramuscular fat proportion of C18:1 n-7 was greater in BS than in AH (P = 0.016), whereas the proportion of C18:3 n-3 tended to be greater in AH than in BS (P = 0.09). When fatty acid concentration was expressed as gram per 100 g of LM, these differences disappeared, and only the content of C15:0 tended to be greater (P = 0.08) in BS than in AH. Meat characteristics evaluated by trained panelists did not differ in toughness, chewiness, juiciness, odor, taste, and overall acceptability, and there were no differences between diets in Warner-Bratzler shear force values after 3 or 10 d of aging (P > 0.10). In summary, heifers fed TMR with AH at 19% of inclusion showed a greater feed intake and ADG than those fed BS at 10% of inclusion, but without affecting G:F ratio. However, this extra AH was not sufficient to cause any relevant change in the carcass and meat quality of the heifers fed this diet.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30726991
pii: 5307557
doi: 10.1093/jas/skz040
pmc: PMC6488349
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2076-2086Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Meat Sci. 2017 Mar;125:76-83
pubmed: 27918928
J Anim Sci. 2008 Jun;86(6):1446-58
pubmed: 18272856
Meat Sci. 2004 Mar;66(3):567-77
pubmed: 22060866
J Anim Sci. 2013 Jul;91(7):3315-21
pubmed: 23798521
Meat Sci. 2003 Mar;63(3):279-86
pubmed: 22062378
J Anim Sci. 1994 Aug;72(8):1943-53
pubmed: 7982821
Meat Sci. 2008 Nov;80(3):753-60
pubmed: 22063593
J Anim Sci. 2018 Feb 15;96(1):1-10
pubmed: 29385598
J Anim Sci. 2000 Nov;78(11):2849-55
pubmed: 11063308
J Anim Sci. 2017 Mar;95(3):1325-1334
pubmed: 28380528
J Anim Sci. 1986 Dec;63(6):2005-12
pubmed: 3818473
J Anim Sci. 2013 Mar;91(3):1454-67
pubmed: 23345568
Meat Sci. 2010 Mar;84(3):545-52
pubmed: 20374822
Meat Sci. 2006 Sep;74(1):17-33
pubmed: 22062713
J Anim Sci. 2016 Jun;94(6):2648-63
pubmed: 27285940
J Dairy Sci. 1991 Oct;74(10):3583-97
pubmed: 1660498
J Anim Sci. 2005 May;83(5):1167-78
pubmed: 15827261
J Biol Chem. 1957 May;226(1):497-509
pubmed: 13428781
J Anim Sci. 2006 Nov;84(11):3039-48
pubmed: 17032798
Meat Sci. 2006 Apr;72(4):719-26
pubmed: 22061885
Meat Sci. 2006 Oct;74(2):231-41
pubmed: 22062830
J Anim Sci. 2008 Dec;86(12):3575-85
pubmed: 18641180
J Anim Sci. 2012 Mar;90(3):960-72
pubmed: 21965452
Meat Sci. 2007 Feb;75(2):324-31
pubmed: 22063665
J Anim Sci. 2007 Oct;85(10):2691-8
pubmed: 17644782