The increase in muscle force after 4 weeks of strength training is mediated by adaptations in motor unit recruitment and rate coding.
Decomposition
EMG
Motor Units
Neural Adaptations
Resistance Training
Journal
The Journal of physiology
ISSN: 1469-7793
Titre abrégé: J Physiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0266262
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2019
04 2019
Historique:
received:
29
09
2018
accepted:
03
12
2018
pubmed:
7
2
2019
medline:
18
7
2020
entrez:
7
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Previous studies have indicated that several weeks of strength training is sufficient to elicit significant adaptations in the neural drive sent to the muscles. There are few data, however, on the changes elicited by strength training in the recruitment and rate coding of motor units during voluntary contractions. We show for the first time that the discharge characteristics of motor units in the tibialis anterior muscle tracked across the intervention are changed by 4 weeks of strength training with isometric voluntary contractions. The specific adaptations included significant increases in motor unit discharge rate, decreases in the recruitment-threshold force of motor units and a similar input-output gain of the motor neurons. The findings suggest that the adaptations in motor unit function may be attributable to changes in synaptic input to the motor neuron pool or to adaptations in intrinsic motor neuron properties. The strength of a muscle typically begins to increase after only a few sessions of strength training. This increase is usually attributed to changes in the neural drive to muscle as a result of adaptations at the cortical or spinal level. We investigated the change in the discharge characteristics of large populations of longitudinally tracked motor units in tibialis anterior before and after 4 weeks of strength training the ankle-dorsiflexor muscles with isometric contractions. The adaptations exhibited by 14 individuals were compared with 14 control subjects. High-density electromyogram grids with 128 electrodes recorded the myoelectric activity during isometric ramp contractions to the target forces of 35%, 50% and 70% of maximal voluntary force. The motor unit recruitment and derecruitment thresholds, discharge rate, interspike intervals and estimates of synaptic inputs to motor neurons were assessed. The normalized recruitment-threshold forces of the motor units were decreased after strength training (P < 0.05). Moreover, discharge rate increased by 3.3 ± 2.5 pps (average across subjects and motor units) during the plateau phase of the submaximal isometric contractions (P < 0.001). Discharge rates at recruitment and derecruitment were not modified by training (P < 0.05). The association between force and motor unit discharge rate during the ramp-phase of the contractions was also not altered by training (P < 0.05). These results demonstrate for the first time that the increase in muscle force after 4 weeks of strength training is the result of an increase in motor neuron output from the spinal cord to the muscle.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30727028
doi: 10.1113/JP277250
pmc: PMC6441907
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1873-1887Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology © 2019 The Physiological Society.
Références
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999 Apr;31(4):588-94
pubmed: 10211857
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000 Oct;83(2-3):128-43
pubmed: 11104053
Muscle Nerve. 2001 Apr;24(4):542-50
pubmed: 11268027
J Neurosci Methods. 2002 Mar 30;115(1):1-12
pubmed: 11897359
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2002 Jun;92(6):2309-18
pubmed: 12015341
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2002 Oct;93(4):1318-26
pubmed: 12235031
J Physiol. 2002 Oct 15;544(Pt 2):641-52
pubmed: 12381833
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Feb;37(2):256-61
pubmed: 15692321
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004 Dec;59(12):1334-8
pubmed: 15699535
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005 Oct;99(4):1558-68
pubmed: 15890749
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006 Oct;101(4):1228-36
pubmed: 16778002
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006 Dec;101(6):1766-75
pubmed: 16794023
Muscle Nerve. 2007 Jan;35(1):78-86
pubmed: 17039464
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007 Jan;102(1):368-73
pubmed: 17053104
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009 Jan;105(1):131-9
pubmed: 18853177
Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2009 Oct;197(2):161-73
pubmed: 19392872
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2010 Nov;109(5):1455-66
pubmed: 20829500
Muscle Nerve. 2011 Feb;43(2):245-50
pubmed: 21254090
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Apr;44(4):616-24
pubmed: 21904248
Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2012 Oct;206(2):109-19
pubmed: 22642686
J Neural Eng. 2014 Feb;11(1):016008
pubmed: 24654270
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 22;9(12):e115567
pubmed: 25531294
J Physiol. 2015 Sep 1;593(17):3789-804
pubmed: 26174910
Physiology (Bethesda). 2016 Mar;31(2):83-94
pubmed: 26889014
J Neural Eng. 2016 Apr;13(2):026027
pubmed: 26924829
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2016 Jun 1;120(11):1364-73
pubmed: 27055984
J Physiol. 2017 Mar 1;595(5):1479-1496
pubmed: 28032343
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Nov;49(11):2286-2296
pubmed: 28692630
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2017 Oct 1;123(4):835-843
pubmed: 28751374
Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2018 Feb;222(2):
pubmed: 28763156
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2018 Jun;40:102-109
pubmed: 29705496
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2018 Nov 1;125(5):1404-1410
pubmed: 29975604
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2018 Jul 19;:
pubmed: 30024336
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1983;15(6):455-60
pubmed: 6656553
J Physiol. 1977 Jan;264(3):673-93
pubmed: 845820
J Physiol. 1998 Nov 15;513 ( Pt 1):295-305
pubmed: 9782179