Using physical education to promote out-of school physical activity in lower secondary school students - a randomized controlled trial protocol.
Autonomy support
Behavioural intervention
Intervention development
Self-determination theory
Theory of planned behaviour
Trans-contextual model
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Feb 2019
06 Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
20
08
2018
accepted:
24
01
2019
entrez:
8
2
2019
pubmed:
8
2
2019
medline:
12
3
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Given the documented decline in levels of physical activity in early adolescence, promoting physical activity in young people is a priority for health promotion. School physical education (PE) is an important existing network in which participation in physical activity beyond school can be promoted to the captive young people. The objective of current article is to present the protocol for a PE teacher-delivered theory-based trial to promote secondary school students' participation in physical activity out-of-school contexts. The intervention will be guided by the trans-contextual model explaining the processes by which PE teachers' support for autonomous motivation in the classroom promotes students' motivation to engage in out-of-school physical activity. We hypothesize that school students receiving the teacher-delivered intervention to promote autonomous motivation toward physical activity will exhibit greater participation in physical activities outside of school, relative to students receiving a control intervention. The trial will adopt a waitlist-control design with cluster-randomization by school. PE teachers assigned to the intervention condition will receive a two-week, 12-h training program comprising basic information on how to promote out-of-school physical activity and theory-based training on strategies to promote students' autonomous motivation toward physical activity. Teachers assigned to the waitlist control condition will receive an alternative training on how to monitor physical functional capacity in children with special needs. PE teachers (n = 29) from eleven schools will apply the intervention program to students (n = 502) in PE classes for one month. Physical activity participation, the primary outcome variable, and psychological mediators from the trans-contextual model will be measured at pre-trial, post-trial, and at one-, three- and six-months post-trial. We will also assess teachers' autonomy-supportive techniques and behaviours by observation. The study will make a unique contribution to the literature by testing a theory-based intervention delivered by PE teachers to promote school students' participation in out-of-school physical activity. Information will be useful for educators, community stakeholders and policy makers interested in developing programs to promote students' out-of-school physical activity. ISRCTN39374060 . Registered 19.7.2018.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Given the documented decline in levels of physical activity in early adolescence, promoting physical activity in young people is a priority for health promotion. School physical education (PE) is an important existing network in which participation in physical activity beyond school can be promoted to the captive young people. The objective of current article is to present the protocol for a PE teacher-delivered theory-based trial to promote secondary school students' participation in physical activity out-of-school contexts. The intervention will be guided by the trans-contextual model explaining the processes by which PE teachers' support for autonomous motivation in the classroom promotes students' motivation to engage in out-of-school physical activity. We hypothesize that school students receiving the teacher-delivered intervention to promote autonomous motivation toward physical activity will exhibit greater participation in physical activities outside of school, relative to students receiving a control intervention.
METHODS
METHODS
The trial will adopt a waitlist-control design with cluster-randomization by school. PE teachers assigned to the intervention condition will receive a two-week, 12-h training program comprising basic information on how to promote out-of-school physical activity and theory-based training on strategies to promote students' autonomous motivation toward physical activity. Teachers assigned to the waitlist control condition will receive an alternative training on how to monitor physical functional capacity in children with special needs. PE teachers (n = 29) from eleven schools will apply the intervention program to students (n = 502) in PE classes for one month. Physical activity participation, the primary outcome variable, and psychological mediators from the trans-contextual model will be measured at pre-trial, post-trial, and at one-, three- and six-months post-trial. We will also assess teachers' autonomy-supportive techniques and behaviours by observation.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
The study will make a unique contribution to the literature by testing a theory-based intervention delivered by PE teachers to promote school students' participation in out-of-school physical activity. Information will be useful for educators, community stakeholders and policy makers interested in developing programs to promote students' out-of-school physical activity.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ISRCTN39374060 . Registered 19.7.2018.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30727989
doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6478-x
pii: 10.1186/s12889-019-6478-x
pmc: PMC6364480
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
157Subventions
Organisme : Opetus- ja Kulttuuriministeriö
ID : OKM/62/626/2016
Références
Scand J Psychol. 1999 Dec;40(4):307-17
pubmed: 10658515
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 Sep;32(9):1598-600
pubmed: 10994911
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78
pubmed: 11392867
Prev Med. 2003 Apr;36(4):493-501
pubmed: 12649058
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95
pubmed: 12900694
Health Psychol. 2004 Sep;23(5):443-51
pubmed: 15367063
Dev Psychol. 2004 Nov;40(6):965-78
pubmed: 15535751
Health Psychol. 2006 Jan;25(1):91-101
pubmed: 16448302
J Pers Assess. 2009 Mar;91(2):166-74
pubmed: 19205937
Annu Rev Public Health. 2010;31:399-418
pubmed: 20070207
Psychol Health. 2009 Jan;24(1):29-48
pubmed: 20186638
Psychol Health. 2009 Jul;24(6):689-711
pubmed: 20205021
BMC Med. 2010 Mar 24;8:18
pubmed: 20334633
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 May 11;7:40
pubmed: 20459784
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2012 Jun;34(3):365-96
pubmed: 22691399
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Aug 30;9:102
pubmed: 22935297
BMJ. 2013 Jan 08;346:e7586
pubmed: 23303884
Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95
pubmed: 23512568
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Mar 28;10:40
pubmed: 23537492
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Jan 29;11:10
pubmed: 24475766
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Jul;7(4):325-40
pubmed: 26168470
BMC Public Health. 2016 May 27;16:451
pubmed: 27229682
Rev Educ Res. 2016 Jun;86(2):360-407
pubmed: 27274585
Annu Rev Psychol. 2017 Jan 3;68:573-600
pubmed: 27618942
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Nov;57(5):749-61
pubmed: 2810024
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Mar 21;14(1):37
pubmed: 28327174
Dev Psychol. 2017 Oct;53(10):1978-1994
pubmed: 28805437
Br J Educ Psychol. 2018 Aug 13;:null
pubmed: 30101970