Pathogens in fleas collected from cats and dogs: distribution and prevalence in the UK.


Journal

Parasites & vectors
ISSN: 1756-3305
Titre abrégé: Parasit Vectors
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101462774

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Feb 2019
Historique:
received: 05 11 2018
accepted: 29 01 2019
entrez: 8 2 2019
pubmed: 8 2 2019
medline: 20 2 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Fleas (Siphonaptera) are the most clinically important ectoparasites of dogs and cats worldwide. Rising levels of pet ownership, climate change and globalisation are increasing the importance of a detailed understanding of the endemicity and prevalence of flea-borne pathogens. This requires continued surveillance to detect change. This study reports a large-scale survey of pathogens in fleas collected from client-owned cats and dogs in the UK. Recruited veterinary practices were asked to follow a standardised flea inspection protocol on a randomised selection of cats and dogs brought into the practice in April and June 2018. A total of 326 practices participated and 812 cats and 662 dogs were examined. Fleas were collected, identified to species and pooled flea samples from each host were analysed for the presence of pathogens using PCR and sequence analysis. Overall, 28.1% of cats and 14.4% of dogs were flea infested. More than 90% of the fleas on both cats and dogs were cat fleas, Ctenocephalides felis felis. Fleas of the same species from each infested host were pooled. DNA was amplified from 470 of the pooled flea samples using conventional PCR, 66 of which (14% ± 95% CI 3.14%) were positive for at least one pathogen. Fifty-three (11.3% ± 95% CI 2.85%) of the pooled flea DNA samples were positive for Bartonella spp., 35 were from cats and 4 from dogs, the remainder had no host record. Seventeen of the Bartonella spp. samples were found to be Bartonella henselae, 27 were Bartonella clarridgeiae (of two different strains), 4 samples were Bartonella alsatica and one was Bartonella grahamii; 4 samples could not be identified. Fourteen (3% ± 95% CI 1.53%) of the flea DNA samples were found to be positive for Dipylidium caninum, 10 of the D. caninum-infected samples were collected from cats and one from a dog, the other 3 positive flea samples had no host species record. Only 3 flea samples were positive for Mycoplasma haemofelis or Mycoplasma haemocanis; 2 were collected from cats and one had no host species record. Three fleas were positive for both D. caninum and Bartonella spp. One flea was positive for both Bartonella spp. and M. haemofelis or M. haemocanis. This study highlights the need for ongoing flea control, particularly given the relatively high prevalence of Bartonella spp., which is of concern for both animal welfare and human health. The study demonstrates the ongoing need to educate pet owners about the effects of both flea infestation and also the pathogen risks these fleas present.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Fleas (Siphonaptera) are the most clinically important ectoparasites of dogs and cats worldwide. Rising levels of pet ownership, climate change and globalisation are increasing the importance of a detailed understanding of the endemicity and prevalence of flea-borne pathogens. This requires continued surveillance to detect change. This study reports a large-scale survey of pathogens in fleas collected from client-owned cats and dogs in the UK.
METHODS METHODS
Recruited veterinary practices were asked to follow a standardised flea inspection protocol on a randomised selection of cats and dogs brought into the practice in April and June 2018. A total of 326 practices participated and 812 cats and 662 dogs were examined. Fleas were collected, identified to species and pooled flea samples from each host were analysed for the presence of pathogens using PCR and sequence analysis.
RESULTS RESULTS
Overall, 28.1% of cats and 14.4% of dogs were flea infested. More than 90% of the fleas on both cats and dogs were cat fleas, Ctenocephalides felis felis. Fleas of the same species from each infested host were pooled. DNA was amplified from 470 of the pooled flea samples using conventional PCR, 66 of which (14% ± 95% CI 3.14%) were positive for at least one pathogen. Fifty-three (11.3% ± 95% CI 2.85%) of the pooled flea DNA samples were positive for Bartonella spp., 35 were from cats and 4 from dogs, the remainder had no host record. Seventeen of the Bartonella spp. samples were found to be Bartonella henselae, 27 were Bartonella clarridgeiae (of two different strains), 4 samples were Bartonella alsatica and one was Bartonella grahamii; 4 samples could not be identified. Fourteen (3% ± 95% CI 1.53%) of the flea DNA samples were found to be positive for Dipylidium caninum, 10 of the D. caninum-infected samples were collected from cats and one from a dog, the other 3 positive flea samples had no host species record. Only 3 flea samples were positive for Mycoplasma haemofelis or Mycoplasma haemocanis; 2 were collected from cats and one had no host species record. Three fleas were positive for both D. caninum and Bartonella spp. One flea was positive for both Bartonella spp. and M. haemofelis or M. haemocanis.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This study highlights the need for ongoing flea control, particularly given the relatively high prevalence of Bartonella spp., which is of concern for both animal welfare and human health. The study demonstrates the ongoing need to educate pet owners about the effects of both flea infestation and also the pathogen risks these fleas present.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30728050
doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3326-x
pii: 10.1186/s13071-019-3326-x
pmc: PMC6366081
doi:

Substances chimiques

DNA, Bacterial 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

71

Références

Am J Vet Res. 2001 May;62(5):687-91
pubmed: 11341386
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2001 Jun 15;218(12):1943-5, 1936
pubmed: 11417738
Vet Rec. 2003 Feb 15;152(7):193-8
pubmed: 12620033
Vet Microbiol. 2004 Sep 8;102(3-4):183-8
pubmed: 15327793
Vet Parasitol. 2005 Jun 10;130(1-2):157-62
pubmed: 15893082
N Z Vet J. 1984 May;32(5):71-3
pubmed: 16031050
Vet Parasitol. 2006 Apr 15;137(1-2):130-6
pubmed: 16442233
J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Mar;44(3):961-9
pubmed: 16517884
Vet Microbiol. 2006 Dec 20;118(3-4):274-7
pubmed: 16919405
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jan 1;89(1):43-6
pubmed: 1729713
Vet Rec. 2007 Apr 14;160(15):503-6
pubmed: 17435095
Vet Microbiol. 2008 Jan 1;126(1-3):142-50
pubmed: 17689890
J Feline Med Surg. 2008 Aug;10(4):413-7
pubmed: 18313962
Emerg Infect Dis. 2008 Dec;14(12):1922-4
pubmed: 19046522
Vet Parasitol. 2009 Aug 26;163(4):298-305
pubmed: 19403239
Vet Res. 2009 Sep-Oct;40(5):45
pubmed: 19505421
Vet Microbiol. 2010 Jan 6;140(1-2):98-104
pubmed: 19660880
Med Vet Entomol. 2009 Sep;23(3):187-94
pubmed: 19712149
Microb Pathog. 2009 Dec;47(6):334-40
pubmed: 19782126
Vet Dermatol. 2009 Oct;20(5-6):509-14
pubmed: 20178489
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2010 Mar;22(2):270-4
pubmed: 20224091
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2010 Feb;20(1):8-30
pubmed: 20230432
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Oct;48(10):3782-5
pubmed: 20702675
Int J Med Microbiol. 2011 Jan;301(1):7-15
pubmed: 20833105
Parasite. 2010 Dec;17(4):337-42
pubmed: 21275240
Infect Genet Evol. 2011 Dec;11(8):1868-72
pubmed: 21856444
Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2011 Oct;105(7):493-8
pubmed: 22185943
J Clin Microbiol. 2012 May;50(5):1645-9
pubmed: 22378904
Epidemiol Infect. 2013 Jan;141(1):54-61
pubmed: 22459880
J Vet Intern Med. 2012 May-Jun;26(3):639-44
pubmed: 22490060
Vet Parasitol. 2014 Sep 15;205(1-2):300-6
pubmed: 24986432
Med Vet Entomol. 2015 Sep;29(3):344-8
pubmed: 25865162
Parasit Vectors. 2016 May 10;9(1):247
pubmed: 27160725
Vet Parasitol. 2017 Jan 30;234:25-30
pubmed: 28115179
Parasitol Int. 2018 Apr;67(2):209-212
pubmed: 29217417
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Apr 25;56(5):
pubmed: 29540455
Parasit Vectors. 2018 Mar 20;11(1):201
pubmed: 29558992
Parasit Vectors. 2018 Mar 20;11(1):196
pubmed: 29559005
Parasit Vectors. 2018 Apr 4;11(1):227
pubmed: 29618378
Parasite. 2018;25:31
pubmed: 29806593
Int J Vet Sci Med. 2018 Apr 27;6(1):45-47
pubmed: 30255077
Vet Parasitol. 1987 Jan;23(1-2):135-40
pubmed: 3564340
Vet Rec. 1986 Jul 5;119(1):16-7
pubmed: 3750753
Science. 1985 Feb 1;227(4686):543-5
pubmed: 3966162
Vet Rec. 1972 Aug 5;91(6):151-2
pubmed: 5072630
Tierarztl Prax. 1977;5(4):507-11
pubmed: 595001
Nord Vet Med. 1978 Oct;30(10):401-13
pubmed: 714660
J Small Anim Pract. 1981 Jan;22(1):27-9
pubmed: 7193779
Vet Rec. 1995 Apr 8;136(14):356-8
pubmed: 7610540
J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Aug;34(8):1952-6
pubmed: 8818889
Emerg Infect Dis. 1997 Jul-Sep;3(3):319-27
pubmed: 9284376
Med Vet Entomol. 1997 Oct;11(4):404-6
pubmed: 9430123

Auteurs

Swaid Abdullah (S)

Veterinary Parasitology and Ecology Group, School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. swaid.abdullah@uq.edu.au.
Present address: School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Australia. swaid.abdullah@uq.edu.au.

Chris Helps (C)

Molecular Diagnostic Unit, Langford Vets and Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Séverine Tasker (S)

Molecular Diagnostic Unit, Langford Vets and Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Present address: The Linnaeus Group, Shirley, UK.

Hannah Newbury (H)

MSD Animal Health, Walton Manor, Walton, Milton Keynes, UK.

Richard Wall (R)

Veterinary Parasitology and Ecology Group, School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH