Capital Femoral Epiphyseal Extension May Confer Physeal Stability in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.
Adolescent
Body Weights and Measures
/ methods
Child
Cohort Studies
Disease Progression
Female
Femur Head
/ diagnostic imaging
Femur Neck
/ diagnostic imaging
Growth Plate
/ diagnostic imaging
Hip Joint
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
Male
Prognosis
Risk Assessment
/ methods
Risk Factors
Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphyses
/ diagnosis
Journal
Journal of pediatric orthopedics
ISSN: 1539-2570
Titre abrégé: J Pediatr Orthop
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8109053
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
entrez:
8
2
2019
pubmed:
8
2
2019
medline:
26
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Factors including obesity and morphologic parameters around the hip that increase physeal stress are associated with an increased risk of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Recent evidence suggests that superior epiphyseal extension may confer stability to the physis and help protect against SCFE. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between epiphyseal extension and SCFE using an age-matched and sex-matched cohort study. We generated 2 separate cohorts for comparison: 89 patients with unilateral SCFE and 89 healthy subjects with no evidence of hip disease or deformity. We utilized the anterior-posterior and lateral films of the hip to measure the Southwick angle and the epiphyseal extension ratio (EER), defined as the ratio of extension of the capital femoral epiphysis down the femoral neck relative to the diameter of the femoral head. We then compared these measurements between cohorts and in subgroup analysis based on slip stability and whether subjects progressed to a contralateral slip. The SCFE cohort demonstrated a decreased superior epiphyseal extension ratio compared with control (superior EER 0.71 vs. 0.68, P=0.002). There was also a significant downward trend in superior EER from the control subjects (0.71±0.07) to the stable slips (0.69±0.06) to the unstable slips (0.65±0.04) with an overall difference between the groups (P=0.001). Eighteen of 44 (41%) subjects with unilateral stable slips and at least 6 months of follow-up went on to develop SCFE of the contralateral limb. The subjects who developed contralateral slips were younger (11.6±1.2 vs. 12.7±1.4 y, P=0.008); however, there was no difference in superior or anterior epiphyseal extension (P=0.75 and 0.23, respectively). There was no significant linear correlation between Southwick angle and superior or anterior EER (r=0.13 and 0.17, respectively, P>0.05 for both). Increasing capital femoral epiphyseal extension may confer physeal stability in the setting of SCFE. We propose that this epiphyseal extension reflects an adaptive response to limit physeal stress and reduce the risk for progression to SCFE. Level III-prognostic study.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Factors including obesity and morphologic parameters around the hip that increase physeal stress are associated with an increased risk of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Recent evidence suggests that superior epiphyseal extension may confer stability to the physis and help protect against SCFE. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between epiphyseal extension and SCFE using an age-matched and sex-matched cohort study.
METHODS
METHODS
We generated 2 separate cohorts for comparison: 89 patients with unilateral SCFE and 89 healthy subjects with no evidence of hip disease or deformity. We utilized the anterior-posterior and lateral films of the hip to measure the Southwick angle and the epiphyseal extension ratio (EER), defined as the ratio of extension of the capital femoral epiphysis down the femoral neck relative to the diameter of the femoral head. We then compared these measurements between cohorts and in subgroup analysis based on slip stability and whether subjects progressed to a contralateral slip.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The SCFE cohort demonstrated a decreased superior epiphyseal extension ratio compared with control (superior EER 0.71 vs. 0.68, P=0.002). There was also a significant downward trend in superior EER from the control subjects (0.71±0.07) to the stable slips (0.69±0.06) to the unstable slips (0.65±0.04) with an overall difference between the groups (P=0.001). Eighteen of 44 (41%) subjects with unilateral stable slips and at least 6 months of follow-up went on to develop SCFE of the contralateral limb. The subjects who developed contralateral slips were younger (11.6±1.2 vs. 12.7±1.4 y, P=0.008); however, there was no difference in superior or anterior epiphyseal extension (P=0.75 and 0.23, respectively). There was no significant linear correlation between Southwick angle and superior or anterior EER (r=0.13 and 0.17, respectively, P>0.05 for both).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Increasing capital femoral epiphyseal extension may confer physeal stability in the setting of SCFE. We propose that this epiphyseal extension reflects an adaptive response to limit physeal stress and reduce the risk for progression to SCFE.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
METHODS
Level III-prognostic study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30730415
doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000881
pii: 01241398-201903000-00003
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM