The Effect of Goal-Directed Therapy on Patient Morbidity and Mortality After Traumatic Brain Injury: Results From the Progesterone for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury III Clinical Trial.
Journal
Critical care medicine
ISSN: 1530-0293
Titre abrégé: Crit Care Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0355501
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2019
05 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
8
2
2019
medline:
18
2
2020
entrez:
8
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To estimate the impact of goal-directed therapy on outcome after traumatic brain injury, our team applied goal-directed therapy to standardize care in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury, who were enrolled in a large multicenter clinical trial. Planned secondary analysis of data from Progesterone for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury III, a large, prospective, multicenter clinical trial. Forty-two trauma centers within the Neurologic Emergencies Treatment Trials network. Eight-hundred eighty-two patients were enrolled within 4 hours of injury after nonpenetrating traumatic brain injury characterized by Glasgow Coma Scale score of 4-12. Physiologic goals were defined a priori in order to standardize care across 42 sites participating in Progesterone for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury III. Physiologic data collection occurred hourly; laboratory data were collected according to local ICU protocols and at a minimum of once per day. Physiologic transgressions were predefined as substantial deviations from the normal range of goal-directed therapy. Each hour where goal-directed therapy was not achieved was classified as a "transgression." Data were adjudicated electronically and via expert review. Six-month outcomes included mortality and the stratified dichotomy of the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended. For each variable, the association between outcome and either: 1) the occurrence of a transgression or 2) the proportion of time spent in transgression was estimated via logistic regression model. For the 882 patients enrolled in Progesterone for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury III, mortality was 12.5%. Prolonged time spent in transgression was associated with increased mortality in the full cohort for hemoglobin less than 8 gm/dL (p = 0.0006), international normalized ratio greater than 1.4 (p < 0.0001), glucose greater than 180 mg/dL (p = 0.0003), and systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg (p < 0.0001). In the patient subgroup with intracranial pressure monitoring, prolonged time spent in transgression was associated with increased mortality for intracranial pressure greater than or equal to 20 mm Hg (p < 0.0001), glucose greater than 180 mg/dL (p = 0.0293), hemoglobin less than 8 gm/dL (p = 0.0220), or systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg (p = 0.0114). Covariates inversely related to mortality included: a single occurrence of mean arterial pressure less than 65 mm Hg (p = 0.0051) or systolic blood pressure greater than 180 mm Hg (p = 0.0002). The Progesterone for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury III clinical trial rigorously monitored compliance with goal-directed therapy after traumatic brain injury. Multiple significant associations between physiologic transgressions, morbidity, and mortality were observed. These data suggest that effective goal-directed therapy in traumatic brain injury may provide an opportunity to improve patient outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30730438
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003680
pmc: PMC7778459
mid: NIHMS1653357
doi:
Substances chimiques
Neuroprotective Agents
0
Progesterone
4G7DS2Q64Y
Types de publication
Controlled Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
623-631Subventions
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : U01 NS056975
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : U01 NS062778
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : U10 NS059032
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
J Crit Care. 2014 Apr;29(2):204-9
pubmed: 24360819
J Neurotrauma. 2015 Nov 15;32(22):1722-4
pubmed: 26061135
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Jan;31(1):98-104
pubmed: 15650863
J Neurosurg. 2013 Nov;119(5):1248-54
pubmed: 23971954
Crit Care. 2012 Jul 20;16(4):R128
pubmed: 22817913
Injury. 2012 Nov;43(11):1833-7
pubmed: 21939970
J Neurotrauma. 2013 Oct 15;30(20):1737-46
pubmed: 23731257
Arch Surg. 2001 Oct;136(10):1118-23
pubmed: 11585502
J Neurosurg. 2018 May;128(5):1530-1537
pubmed: 28644101
Crit Care Med. 2002 Apr;30(4):733-8
pubmed: 11940737
Neurosurgery. 2017 Jan 01;80(1):6-15
pubmed: 27654000
J Neurotrauma. 2002 May;19(5):503-57
pubmed: 12042091
Lancet. 2005 Jun 4-10;365(9475):1957-9
pubmed: 15936423
JAMA. 2014 Jun 4;311(21):2181-90
pubmed: 24842135
J Trauma. 2008 Feb;64(2):335-40
pubmed: 18301195
Epilepsia. 2003;44(s10):2-10
pubmed: 14511388
N Engl J Med. 2014 Dec 25;371(26):2457-66
pubmed: 25493974
Neurocrit Care. 2015 Aug;23(1):78-84
pubmed: 25510896
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 8;376(23):2223-2234
pubmed: 28320242
Lancet Neurol. 2011 Feb;10(2):131-9
pubmed: 21169065
J Neurotrauma. 2007 Feb;24(2):294-302
pubmed: 17375994
Neurocrit Care. 2007;6(2):104-12
pubmed: 17522793
JAMA Surg. 2017 Apr 1;152(4):360-368
pubmed: 27926759
Neurocrit Care. 2013 Feb;18(1):131-42
pubmed: 22890909
Lancet Neurol. 2017 Aug;16(8):630-647
pubmed: 28721927
J Neurotrauma. 2016 Aug 25;:
pubmed: 26431625
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 29;7(3):e014472
pubmed: 28360248
J Neurosurg. 2013 Dec;119(6):1583-90
pubmed: 24098983
J Neurotrauma. 2007;24 Suppl 1:S1-106
pubmed: 17511534
J Trauma. 2010 Apr;68(4):904-11
pubmed: 20032790
J Neurotrauma. 2007 Feb;24(2):232-8
pubmed: 17375987
J Neurosurg. 2008 Oct;109(4):664-9
pubmed: 18826353
Trials. 2012 Jun 21;13:87
pubmed: 22721545
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Mar 17;66(9):1-16
pubmed: 28301451