Visual mismatch negativity to disappearing parts of objects and textures.
Acclimatization
/ physiology
Adaptation, Physiological
/ physiology
Adult
Brain
/ physiology
Electroencephalography
/ methods
Evoked Potentials, Visual
/ physiology
Female
Humans
Male
Object Attachment
Orientation
/ physiology
Orientation, Spatial
/ physiology
Probability
Visual Perception
/ physiology
Young Adult
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
20
11
2018
accepted:
26
01
2019
entrez:
8
2
2019
pubmed:
8
2
2019
medline:
30
10
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Visual mismatch negativity (vMMN), an event-related signature of automatic detection of events violating sequential regularities is traditionally investigated at the onset of frequent (standard) and rare (deviant) events. In a previous study we obtained vMMN to vanishing parts of continuously presented objects (diamonds with diagonals), and we concluded that the offset-related vMMN is a model of sensitivity to irregular partial occlusion of objects. In the present study we replicated the previous results, but in order to test the object-related interpretation we applied a new condition with a set of separate visual stimuli: a texture of bars with two orientations. In the texture condition (offset of bars with irregular vs. regular orientation) we obtained vMMN, showing that the continuous presence of objects is unnecessary for offset-related vMMN. However, unlike in the object-related condition, reappearance of the previously vanishing lines also elicited vMMN. In principle reappearance of the stimuli is an event with probability 1.0, and according to our results, the object condition reappearance was an expected event. However, the offset and onset of texture elements seems to be treated separately by the system underlying vMMN. As an advantage of the present method, the whole stimulus set during the inter-stimulus interval saturates the visual structures sensitive to stimulus input. Accordingly, the offset-related vMMN is less sensitive to low-level adaptation that differs between the deviant and standard stimuli.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30730889
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209130
pii: PONE-D-18-33292
pmc: PMC6366727
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0209130Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Eur J Neurosci. 2016 Jun;43(12):1590-600
pubmed: 27108896
Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Mar;120(3):453-63
pubmed: 19181570
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Apr 29;360(1456):815-36
pubmed: 15937014
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Feb;17(2):320-39
pubmed: 15811243
Psychophysiology. 2002 Nov;39(6):869-73
pubmed: 12462515
Psychophysiology. 2009 Mar;46(2):402-9
pubmed: 19207207
Cortex. 2016 Jul;80:76-112
pubmed: 27174389
Brain Res. 2015 Nov 11;1626:31-44
pubmed: 25598206
Int J Psychophysiol. 2012 Feb;83(2):132-43
pubmed: 22047947
Doc Ophthalmol. 1997-1998;94(4):307-20
pubmed: 9858091
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 11;12(12):e0188929
pubmed: 29228033
Eur J Neurosci. 2018 May 15;:
pubmed: 29766590
Behav Brain Res. 2018 Jul 16;347:77-87
pubmed: 29524450
J Neurosci. 2012 Mar 14;32(11):3665-78
pubmed: 22423089
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jan 22;8:1074
pubmed: 25657621
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Sep 16;8:666
pubmed: 25278859
Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 15;125:13-24
pubmed: 26455899