Dynamic Balance Measurements Can Differentiate Patients Who Fall From Patients Who Do Not Fall in Patients With Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.
Gait
Hydrocephalus
Rehabilitation
Journal
Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
ISSN: 1532-821X
Titre abrégé: Arch Phys Med Rehabil
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985158R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2019
08 2019
Historique:
received:
22
12
2018
revised:
14
01
2019
accepted:
18
01
2019
pubmed:
8
2
2019
medline:
28
1
2020
entrez:
8
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate which clinical assessments are suitable for differentiating patients who fall from patients who do not fall in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). Prospective observational study. Osaka Medical College Hospital. Patients with a cerebrospinal fluid tap test (TT) result meeting the diagnosis criteria for iNPH (N=68). Not applicable. Participants were assessed before the TT based on the following: timed Up and Go (TUG), 10-meter walk test (10MWT), Functional Gait Assessment (FGA), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), isometric quadriceps strength (QS), and a history of falls within the past 6 months. The full area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curves and 95% confidence interval were found to be 0.651 (95% confidence interval, 0.503-0.775) for the TUG, 0.692 (95% confidence interval, 0.540-0.812) for the 10MWT, 0.869 (95% confidence interval, 0.761-0.933) for the FGA, and 0.796 (95% confidence interval, 0.663-0.886) for the BBS; except for QS, they all were identified as statistically significant predictive variables. In the TUG<20 seconds group (n=47), the FGA (AUC 0.849 [95% confidence interval, 0.698-0.932]) and BBS (AUC 0.734 [95% confidence interval, 0.550-0.862]) were found to be statistically significant predictive variables; however, the other assessments were not. In the TUG<15 seconds group (n=34), the FGA was found to be the only statistically significant predictive variable (AUC 0.842 [95% confidence interval, 0.640-0.942]), whereas the other assessments were not. The AUC of the FGA was statistically significantly greater than those of the other assessments. Our findings indicate that patients with iNPH who fall experience falls due to dynamic balance dysfunction during gait rather than lower limb muscle strength. The FGA may be more suitable than other assessments for differentiating patients who fall from patients who do not fall in patients with mild iNPH.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30731067
pii: S0003-9993(19)30083-8
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.01.008
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1458-1466Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.