The patient's view on rare disease trial design - a qualitative study.
Patient involvement
Qualitative study
Rare diseases
Journal
Orphanet journal of rare diseases
ISSN: 1750-1172
Titre abrégé: Orphanet J Rare Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101266602
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 02 2019
07 02 2019
Historique:
received:
07
03
2018
accepted:
21
01
2019
entrez:
9
2
2019
pubmed:
9
2
2019
medline:
20
4
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Clinical trials in rare diseases are more challenging than trials in frequent diseases. Small numbers of eligible trial participants, often complicated by heterogeneity among rare disease patients, hamper the design and conduct of a 'classical' Randomized Controlled Trial. Therefore, novel designs are developed by statisticians. However, it is important to be aware of possible design aspects that may jeopardize the feasibility of trial conduct. If the burden of participation is considered out of proportion by patients or parents, recruitment may fail or participants may drop out before trial completion. In order to maximize the chance of success of trials in small populations, it is important to know which aspects of trial design are considered important by patients. We have interviewed all ten members of the Patient Think Tank (PTT) of the ASTERIX project, a European research consortium on methodology for clinical trials in small populations. The PTT members are rare disease patient representatives who have completed extensive training in clinical trial methodology. We have analyzed the interviews qualitatively according to Grounded Theory using a thematic analysis, and we structured the topics in four chronologically ordered themes: 1. Involvement in trial design; 2. Opinions on trial design; 3. Trial participation; 4. Phase after the trial. Our main findings are that the PTT-members recommend that patients are involved in trial design from an early stage on, and have influence on the outcomes and measurement instruments that are chosen in the trial, the length of the study, the choice of participants, and the information that is sent to potential participants. Also, according to the PTT-members, patient groups should consider setting up disease registries, placebo groups should be minimized, and more education on clinical trials is advised. Rare disease patient representatives who have been educated about clinical trial methodology think it is important to involve patient representatives in research at an early stage. They can be of advice in trial design in such a way that the ratio of potential benefit and burden of trial participation as well as the chosen outcome measures and in- and exclusion criteria are optimized.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Clinical trials in rare diseases are more challenging than trials in frequent diseases. Small numbers of eligible trial participants, often complicated by heterogeneity among rare disease patients, hamper the design and conduct of a 'classical' Randomized Controlled Trial. Therefore, novel designs are developed by statisticians. However, it is important to be aware of possible design aspects that may jeopardize the feasibility of trial conduct. If the burden of participation is considered out of proportion by patients or parents, recruitment may fail or participants may drop out before trial completion. In order to maximize the chance of success of trials in small populations, it is important to know which aspects of trial design are considered important by patients.
RESULTS
We have interviewed all ten members of the Patient Think Tank (PTT) of the ASTERIX project, a European research consortium on methodology for clinical trials in small populations. The PTT members are rare disease patient representatives who have completed extensive training in clinical trial methodology. We have analyzed the interviews qualitatively according to Grounded Theory using a thematic analysis, and we structured the topics in four chronologically ordered themes: 1. Involvement in trial design; 2. Opinions on trial design; 3. Trial participation; 4. Phase after the trial. Our main findings are that the PTT-members recommend that patients are involved in trial design from an early stage on, and have influence on the outcomes and measurement instruments that are chosen in the trial, the length of the study, the choice of participants, and the information that is sent to potential participants. Also, according to the PTT-members, patient groups should consider setting up disease registries, placebo groups should be minimized, and more education on clinical trials is advised.
CONCLUSIONS
Rare disease patient representatives who have been educated about clinical trial methodology think it is important to involve patient representatives in research at an early stage. They can be of advice in trial design in such a way that the ratio of potential benefit and burden of trial participation as well as the chosen outcome measures and in- and exclusion criteria are optimized.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30732630
doi: 10.1186/s13023-019-1002-z
pii: 10.1186/s13023-019-1002-z
pmc: PMC6367834
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
31Subventions
Organisme : FP7 research program
ID : ASTERIX 603160
Pays : International
Références
Haemophilia. 2012 Nov;18(6):875-80
pubmed: 22681411
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017 Nov 2;12(1):171
pubmed: 29096663
Drug Discov Today. 2013 Nov;18(21-22):1043-51
pubmed: 23968993
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2018 May 11;13(1):77
pubmed: 29751809
Health Policy. 2015 Jul;119(7):964-79
pubmed: 25661982
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2018 Oct 25;13(1):186
pubmed: 30359266
BMJ. 1999 Apr 3;318(7188):916-9
pubmed: 10102858
Mol Genet Metab. 2009 Jan;96(1):20-6
pubmed: 19013090
Int J Qual Health Care. 2008 Dec;20(6):373-4
pubmed: 18836184
Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Feb;31(1):140-9
pubmed: 11914310
J Inherit Metab Dis. 2001 Apr;24(2):291-8
pubmed: 11405347
Lancet. 2008 Jun 14;371(9629):2039-41
pubmed: 18555915
Health Expect. 2012 Sep;15(3):242-54
pubmed: 21332617
Health Policy. 2010 Apr;95(1):10-23
pubmed: 19963299
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51
pubmed: 24979285
Health Expect. 2015 Aug;18(4):489-503
pubmed: 23363240
Health Expect. 2007 Jun;10(2):173-83
pubmed: 17524010
Lancet. 2008 Jun 14;371(9629):2048-51
pubmed: 18555918
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
BMJ Open. 2013 May 09;3(5):
pubmed: 23667160
Health Policy. 2002 Aug;61(2):213-36
pubmed: 12088893
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016 Jun 14;11(1):78
pubmed: 27301273
BMJ. 2014 Nov 24;349:g6802
pubmed: 25422272
J Clin Epidemiol. 1999 Dec;52(12):1143-56
pubmed: 10580777
Qual Health Res. 2009 Mar;19(3):401-15
pubmed: 19224882