Challenges to curing primary brain tumours.
Journal
Nature reviews. Clinical oncology
ISSN: 1759-4782
Titre abrégé: Nat Rev Clin Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101500077
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2019
08 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
9
2
2019
medline:
30
11
2019
entrez:
9
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Despite decades of research, brain tumours remain among the deadliest of all forms of cancer. The ability of these tumours to resist almost all conventional and novel treatments relates, in part, to the unique cell-intrinsic and microenvironmental properties of neural tissues. In an attempt to encourage progress in our understanding and ability to successfully treat patients with brain tumours, Cancer Research UK convened an international panel of clinicians and laboratory-based scientists to identify challenges that must be overcome if we are to cure all patients with a brain tumour. The seven key challenges summarized in this Position Paper are intended to serve as foci for future research and investment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30733593
doi: 10.1038/s41571-019-0177-5
pii: 10.1038/s41571-019-0177-5
pmc: PMC6650350
mid: NIHMS1035140
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
509-520Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_12009
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA116659
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Organisme : Intramural NIH HHS
ID : Z99 CA999999
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS089272
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA129958
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R35 CA197718
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : K02 NS047409
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA014236
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P01 CA096832
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
Gilbert, M. R. et al. A randomized trial of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 370, 699–708 (2014).
pubmed: 24552317
pmcid: 4201043
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1308573
Chinot, O. L. et al. Bevacizumab plus radiotherapy–temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 370, 709–722 (2014).
pubmed: 24552318
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1308345
Smith, M. A. & Reaman, G. H. Remaining challenges in childhood cancer and newer targeted therapeutics. Pediatr. Clin. North Am. 62, 301–312 (2015).
pubmed: 25435124
doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2014.09.018
Brinkman, T. M. et al. Long-term neurocognitive functioning and social attainment in adult survivors of pediatric CNS tumors: results from the St Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 1358–1367 (2016).
pubmed: 26834063
pmcid: 4933131
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.2589
Chemaitilly, W., Armstrong, G. T., Gajjar, A. & Hudson, M. M. Hypothalamic-pituitary axis dysfunction in survivors of childhood CNS tumors: importance of systematic follow-up and early endocrine consultation. J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 4315–4319 (2016).
pubmed: 27998231
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.1847
Phoenix, T. N. et al. Medulloblastoma genotype dictates blood brain barrier phenotype. Cancer Cell 29, 508–522 (2016).
pubmed: 27050100
pmcid: 4829447
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.03.002
Gerstner, E. R. & Fine, R. L. Increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier to chemotherapy in metastatic brain tumors: establishing a treatment paradigm. J. Clin. Oncol. 25, 2306–2312 (2007).
pubmed: 17538177
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.0677
Mackay, A. et al. Integrated molecular meta-analysis of 1,000 pediatric high-grade and diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Cancer Cell 32, 520–537 (2017).
pubmed: 28966033
pmcid: 5637314
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.08.017
Quail, D. F. & Joyce, J. A. The microenvironmental landscape of brain tumors. Cancer Cell 31, 326–341 (2017).
pubmed: 28292436
pmcid: 5424263
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.02.009
Gilbertson, R. J. Mapping cancer origins. Cell 145, 25–29 (2011).
pubmed: 21458665
pmcid: 3077217
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.019
Nimmervoll, B. et al. Establishing a preclinical multidisciplinary board for brain tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 24, 1654–1666 (2018).
pubmed: 29301833
pmcid: 5884708
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2168
Northcott, P. A. et al. Medulloblastomics: the end of the beginning. Nat. Rev. Cancer 12, 818–834 (2012).
pubmed: 23175120
pmcid: 3889646
doi: 10.1038/nrc3410
Chow, S. C. Adaptive clinical trial design. Annu. Rev. Med. 65, 405–415 (2014).
pubmed: 24422576
doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-092012-112310
Alexander, B. M. et al. Adaptive global innovative learning environment for glioblastoma: GBM AGILE. Clin. Cancer Res. 24, 737–743 (2018).
pubmed: 28814435
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0764
Kriegstein, A. & Alvarez-Buylla, A. The glial nature of embryonic and adult neural stem cells. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 32, 149–184 (2009).
pubmed: 19555289
pmcid: 3086722
doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135600
Bjornsson, C. S., Apostolopoulou, M., Tian, Y. & Temple, S. It takes a village: constructing the neurogenic niche. Dev. Cell 32, 435–446 (2015).
pubmed: 25710530
pmcid: 4886554
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.01.010
Singh, S. K. et al. Identification of human brain tumour initiating cells. Nature 432, 396–401 (2004).
doi: 10.1038/nature03128
pubmed: 15549107
Ignatova, T. N. et al. Human cortical glial tumors contain neural stem-like cells expressing astroglial and neuronal markers in vitro. Glia 39, 193–206 (2002).
pubmed: 12203386
doi: 10.1002/glia.10094
Taylor, M. D. et al. Radial glia cells are candidate stem cells of ependymoma. Cancer Cell 8, 323–335 (2005).
pubmed: 16226707
doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.09.001
Calabrese, C. et al. A perivascular niche for brain tumor stem cells. Cancer Cell 11, 69–82 (2007).
pubmed: 17222791
doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.11.020
Lathia, J. D., Mack, S. C., Mulkearns-Hubert, E. E., Valentim, C. L. L. & Rich, J. N. Cancer stem cells in glioblastoma. Genes Dev. 29, 1203–1217 (2015).
pubmed: 26109046
pmcid: 4495393
doi: 10.1101/gad.261982.115
Pei, Y. et al. WNT signaling increases proliferation and impairs differentiation of stem cells in the developing cerebellum. Development 139, 1724–1733 (2012).
pubmed: 22461560
pmcid: 3328175
doi: 10.1242/dev.050104
Goodrich, L. V., Milenkovic, L., Higgins, K. M. & Scott, M. P. Altered neural cell fates and medulloblastoma in mouse patched mutants. Science 277, 1109–1113 (1997).
pubmed: 9262482
doi: 10.1126/science.277.5329.1109
Chen, J. et al. A restricted cell population propagates glioblastoma growth after chemotherapy. Nature 488, 522–526 (2012).
pubmed: 22854781
pmcid: 3427400
doi: 10.1038/nature11287
Gibson, P. et al. Subtypes of medulloblastoma have distinct developmental origins. Nature 468, 1095–1099 (2010).
pubmed: 21150899
pmcid: 3059767
doi: 10.1038/nature09587
Johnson, R. A. et al. Cross-species genomics matches driver mutations and cell compartments to model ependymoma. Nature 466, 632–636 (2010).
pubmed: 20639864
pmcid: 2912966
doi: 10.1038/nature09173
Parker, M. et al. C11orf95-RELA fusions drive oncogenic NF-kappaB signalling in ependymoma. Nature 506, 451–455 (2014).
pubmed: 24553141
pmcid: 4050669
doi: 10.1038/nature13109
Mohankumar, K. M. et al. An in vivo screen identifies ependymoma oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes. Nat. Genet. 47, 878–887 (2015).
pubmed: 26075792
pmcid: 4520751
doi: 10.1038/ng.3323
Tirosh, I. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq supports a developmental hierarchy in human oligodendroglioma. Nature 539, 309–313 (2016).
pubmed: 27806376
pmcid: 5465819
doi: 10.1038/nature20123
Abbott, A. Is ‘friendly fire’ in the brain provoking Alzheimer’s disease? Nature 556, 426–428 (2018).
pubmed: 29691517
doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-04930-7
Sampson, J. H., Maus, M. V. & June, C. H. Immunotherapy for brain tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. 35, 2450–2456 (2017).
pubmed: 28640704
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.8089
Quail, D. F. & Joyce, J. A. Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis. Nat. Med. 19, 1423–1437 (2013).
pubmed: 24202395
pmcid: 3954707
doi: 10.1038/nm.3394
Griveau, A. et al. A glial signature and Wnt7 signaling regulate glioma-vascular interactions and tumor microenvironment. Cancer Cell 33, 874–889 (2018).
pubmed: 29681511
pmcid: 6211172
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.03.020
Louveau, A., Harris, T. H. & Kipnis, J. Revisiting the mechanisms of CNS immune privilege. Trends Immunol. 36, 569–577 (2015).
pubmed: 26431936
pmcid: 4593064
doi: 10.1016/j.it.2015.08.006
Tivnan, A., Heilinger, T., Lavelle, E. C. & Prehn, J. H. M. Advances in immunotherapy for the treatment of glioblastoma. J. Neurooncol. 131, 1–9 (2017).
pubmed: 27743144
doi: 10.1007/s11060-016-2299-2
Zacharakis, N. et al. Immune recognition of somatic mutations leading to complete durable regression in metastatic breast cancer. Nat. Med. 24, 724–730 (2018).
pubmed: 29867227
pmcid: 6348479
doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0040-8
Graeber, M. B., Scheithauer, B. W. & Kreutzberg, G. W. Microglia in brain tumors. Glia 40, 252–259 (2002).
pubmed: 12379912
doi: 10.1002/glia.10147
Ginhoux, F. et al. Fate mapping analysis reveals that adult microglia derive from primitive macrophages. Science 330, 841–845 (2010).
pubmed: 20966214
pmcid: 3719181
doi: 10.1126/science.1194637
Hambardzumyan, D., Gutmann, D. H. & Kettenmann, H. The role of microglia and macrophages in glioma maintenance and progression. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 20 (2015).
doi: 10.1038/nn.4185
Razavi, S.-M. et al. Immune evasion strategies of glioblastoma. Front. Surg. 3, 11 (2016).
pubmed: 26973839
pmcid: 4773586
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2016.00011
Bowman, R. L. & Joyce, J. A. Therapeutic targeting of tumor-associated macrophages and microglia in glioblastoma. Immunotherapy 6, 663–666 (2014).
pubmed: 25041027
doi: 10.2217/imt.14.48
Weller, M. et al. Vaccine-based immunotherapeutic approaches to gliomas and beyond. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 13, 363–374 (2017).
pubmed: 28497804
doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2017.64
Campbell, B. B. et al. Comprehensive analysis of hypermutation in human cancer. Cell 171, 1042–1056 (2017).
pubmed: 29056344
pmcid: 5849393
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.048
Banks, W. A. From blood–brain barrier to blood–brain interface: new opportunities for CNS drug delivery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 15, 275 (2016).
pubmed: 26794270
doi: 10.1038/nrd.2015.21
Larochelle, C. et al. EGFL7 reduces CNS inflammation in mouse. Nat. Commun. 9, 819 (2018).
pubmed: 29483510
pmcid: 5827652
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03186-z
Hawkins, B. T. & Davis, T. P. The blood-brain barrier/neurovascular unit in health and disease. Pharmacol. Rev. 57, 173–185 (2005).
pubmed: 15914466
doi: 10.1124/pr.57.2.4
Daneman, R., Zhou, L., Kebede, A. A. & Barres, B. A. Pericytes are required for blood-brain barrier integrity during embryogenesis. Nature 468, 562–566 (2010).
pubmed: 20944625
pmcid: 3241506
doi: 10.1038/nature09513
Abbott, N. J., Ronnback, L. & Hansson, E. Astrocyte-endothelial interactions at the blood-brain barrier. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 41–53 (2006).
pubmed: 16371949
doi: 10.1038/nrn1824
Vanlandewijck, M. et al. A molecular atlas of cell types and zonation in the brain vasculature. Nature 554, 475–480 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/nature25739
pubmed: 29443965
Kung, Y. et al. Focused shockwave induced blood-brain barrier opening and transfection. Sci. Rep. 8, 2218 (2018).
pubmed: 29396523
pmcid: 5797245
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20672-y
Pajtler, K. W. et al. Molecular classification of ependymal tumors across all CNS compartments, histopathological grades, and age groups. Cancer Cell 27, 728–743 (2015).
pubmed: 25965575
pmcid: 4712639
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.04.002
Jacus, M. O. et al. Pharmacokinetic properties of anticancer agents for the treatment of central nervous system tumors: update of the literature. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 55, 297–311 (2016).
pubmed: 26293618
pmcid: 4761278
doi: 10.1007/s40262-015-0319-6
Carpentier, A. et al. Clinical trial of blood-brain barrier disruption by pulsed ultrasound. Sci. Transl Med. 8, 343re342 (2016).
doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf6086
Rosso, L. et al. A new model for prediction of drug distribution in tumor and normal tissues: pharmacokinetics of temozolomide in glioma patients. Cancer Res. 69, 120–127 (2009).
pubmed: 19117994
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2356
Hubert, C. G. et al. A three-dimensional organoid culture system derived from human glioblastomas recapitulates the hypoxic gradients and cancer stem cell heterogeneity of tumors found in vivo. Cancer Res. 76, 2465–2477 (2016).
pubmed: 26896279
pmcid: 4873351
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-2402
Toledo, C. M. et al. Genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 screens reveal loss of redundancy between PKMYT1 and WEE1 in glioblastoma stem-like cells. Cell Rep. 13, 2425–2439 (2015).
pubmed: 26673326
pmcid: 4691575
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.11.021
Atkinson, J. M. et al. An integrated in vitro and in vivo high-throughput screen identifies treatment leads for ependymoma. Cancer Cell 20, 384–399 (2011).
pubmed: 21907928
pmcid: 3172881
doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.08.013
Housden, B. E. et al. Improved detection of synthetic lethal interactions in Drosophila cells using variable dose analysis (VDA). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E10755–E10762 (2017).
pubmed: 29183982
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1713362114
pmcid: 5740648
Pitter, K. L. et al. Corticosteroids compromise survival in glioblastoma. Brain 139, 1458–1471 (2016).
pubmed: 27020328
pmcid: 5006251
doi: 10.1093/brain/aww046
Krueger, D. A. et al. Everolimus for subependymal giant-cell astrocytomas in tuberous sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 1801–1811 (2010).
pubmed: 21047224
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001671
Kieran, M. W. et al. CNS tumours: the first study of dabrafenib in pediatric patients with BRAF V600–mutant relapsed or refractory low-grade gliomas [abstract]. Ann. Oncol. 27 (Suppl. 6), LBA19_PR (2016).
Singh, D. et al. Transforming fusions of FGFR and TACC genes in human glioblastoma. Science 337, 1231–1235 (2012).
pubmed: 22837387
pmcid: 3677224
doi: 10.1126/science.1220834
Northcott, P. A. et al. Enhancer hijacking activates GFI1 family oncogenes in medulloblastoma. Nature 511, 428–434 (2014).
pubmed: 25043047
pmcid: 4201514
doi: 10.1038/nature13379
Schwartzentruber, J. et al. Driver mutations in histone H3.3 and chromatin remodelling genes in paediatric glioblastoma. Nature 482, 226–231 (2012).
pubmed: 22286061
doi: 10.1038/nature10833
Wu, X. et al. Clonal selection drives genetic divergence of metastatic medulloblastoma. Nature 482, 529–533 (2012).
pubmed: 22343890
pmcid: 3288636
doi: 10.1038/nature10825
Morrissy, A. S. et al. Divergent clonal selection dominates medulloblastoma at recurrence. Nature 529, 351–357 (2016).
pubmed: 26760213
pmcid: 4936195
doi: 10.1038/nature16478
Wang, J. et al. Clonal evolution of glioblastoma under therapy. Nat. Genet. 48, 768–776 (2016).
pubmed: 27270107
pmcid: 5627776
doi: 10.1038/ng.3590
Patel, A. P. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intratumoral heterogeneity in primary glioblastoma. Science 344, 1396–1401 (2014).
pubmed: 24925914
pmcid: 4123637
doi: 10.1126/science.1254257
Darmanis, S. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq analysis of infiltrating neoplastic cells at the migrating front of human glioblastoma. Cell Rep. 21, 1399–1410 (2017).
pubmed: 29091775
pmcid: 5810554
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.030
Brindle, K. M., Izquierdo-Garcia, J. L., Lewis, D. Y., Mair, R. J. & Wright, A. J. Brain tumor imaging. J. Clin. Oncol. 35, 2432–2438 (2017).
pubmed: 28640699
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.7636
Fowler, D. M. & Fields, S. Deep mutational scanning: a new style of protein science. Nat. Methods 11, 801 (2014).
pubmed: 25075907
pmcid: 4410700
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3027
Louis, D. N. et al. The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 131, 803–820 (2016).
pubmed: 27157931
doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1
Pajtler, K. W. et al. The current consensus on the clinical management of intracranial ependymoma and its distinct molecular variants. Acta Neuropathol. 133, 5–12 (2017).
pubmed: 27858204
doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1643-0
Aldape, K., Zadeh, G., Mansouri, S., Reifenberger, G. & von Deimling, A. Glioblastoma: pathology, molecular mechanisms and markers. Acta Neuropathol. 129, 829–848 (2015).
pubmed: 25943888
doi: 10.1007/s00401-015-1432-1
Sturm, D. et al. New brain tumor entities emerge from molecular classification of CNS-PNETs. Cell 164, 1060–1072 (2016).
pubmed: 26919435
pmcid: 5139621
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.015
Capper, D. et al. DNA methylation-based classification of central nervous system tumours. Nature 555, 469–474 (2018).
pubmed: 29539639
pmcid: 6093218
doi: 10.1038/nature26000
Reinartz, R. et al. Functional subclone profiling for prediction of treatment-induced intratumor population shifts and discovery of rational drug combinations in human glioblastoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 23, 562–574 (2017).
pubmed: 27521447
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2089
Day, S. E. et al. Detecting response of rat C6 glioma tumors to radiotherapy using hyperpolarized [1–13C]pyruvate and 13C magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 65, 557–563 (2011).
pubmed: 21264939
doi: 10.1002/mrm.22698
Wan, J. C. M. et al. Liquid biopsies come of age: towards implementation of circulating tumour DNA. Nat. Rev. Cancer 17, 223–238 (2017).
pubmed: 28233803
doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.7
Pentsova, E. I. et al. Evaluating cancer of the central nervous system through next-generation sequencing of cerebrospinal fluid. J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 2404–2415 (2016).
pubmed: 27161972
pmcid: 4981784
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.66.6487
Wen, P. Y. et al. Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J. Clin. Oncol. 28, 1963–1972 (2010).
pubmed: 20231676
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3541
Moxon-Emre, I. et al. Intellectual outcome in molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 4161–4170 (2016).
pubmed: 27507873
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.66.9077
Duffner, P. K. et al. Postoperative chemotherapy and delayed radiation in children less than three years of age with malignant brain tumors. N. Engl. J. Med. 328, 1725–1731 (1993).
pubmed: 8388548
doi: 10.1056/NEJM199306173282401
Packer, R. J. et al. Treatment of children with medulloblastomas with reduced-dose craniospinal radiation therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy: a Children’s Cancer Group Study. J. Clin. Oncol. 17, 2127–2136 (1999).
pubmed: 10561268
doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.7.2127
Geyer, J. R. et al. Multiagent chemotherapy and deferred radiotherapy in infants with malignant brain tumors: a report from the Children’s Cancer Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 7621–7631 (2005).
pubmed: 16234523
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.09.095
Ater, J. L. et al. Randomized study of two chemotherapy regimens for treatment of low-grade glioma in young children: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 30, 2641–2647 (2012).
pubmed: 22665535
pmcid: 3413276
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.6054
Krishnatry, R. et al. Clinical and treatment factors determining long-term outcomes for adult survivors of childhood low-grade glioma: a population-based study. Cancer 122, 1261–1269 (2016).
pubmed: 26970559
doi: 10.1002/cncr.29907
Cole, P. D. et al. Polymorphisms in genes related to oxidative stress are associated with inferior cognitive function after therapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J. Clin. Oncol. 33, 2205–2211 (2015).
pubmed: 25987702
pmcid: 4477790
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.0273
Xu, H. et al. Common variants in ACYP2 influence susceptibility to cisplatin-induced hearing loss. Nat. Genet. 47, 263–266 (2015).
pubmed: 25665007
pmcid: 4358157
doi: 10.1038/ng.3217
Lim, D. A. & Alvarez-Buylla, A. The adult ventricular–subventricular zone (V-SVZ) and olfactory bulb (OB) neurogenesis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 8, a018820 (2016).
pubmed: 27048191
pmcid: 4852803
doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a018820